Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 07 May 2015, 02:21

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If x > 0, is x/y > x ?

Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]  08 Oct 2009, 12:27
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

83% (01:43) correct 17% (00:32) wrong based on 103 sessions
If x > 0, is x/y > x ?

(1) 0 < y < 1
(2) x > 1
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 96
Location: India
Schools: LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [1] , given: 6

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  08 Oct 2009, 12:52
1
KUDOS
amitgovin wrote:
if x>0, is (x/y)>x ?

1) 0<y<1

2) x>1

I got the answer second time around but can someone please give me a good explanation that doesn't use substituting numbers?

1.) x > 0, 0<y<1

then x/y will always be greater than x as y is +ve and also less than 1.

Even if x < 1, (x/y) will be greater than x.

So sufficient.

2.) x>1 .

This does not give any info about y. So insufficient.

So A.
_________________

The Legion dies, it does not surrender.

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 27245
Followers: 4239

Kudos [?]: 41179 [1] , given: 5674

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  08 Oct 2009, 12:54
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
amitgovin wrote:
if x>0, is (x/y)>x ?

1) 0<y<1

2) x>1

I got the answer second time around but can someone please give me a good explanation that doesn't use substituting numbers?

Q is if x>0 is(x/y)>x --> x(1-y)/y>0

(1) x>0 (given), 0<y<1 --> both denominator and nominator >0 so x(1-y)/y>0 Sufficient

(2) x>1 x(1-y)/y can be <0 and >0 depending on y. 0<y<1 it's positive, for all other values of y it's negative. Not sufficient.

A.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Schools: NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 8

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  08 Oct 2009, 15:40
Hi Bunuel!

How did you so quickly come to this conclusion that "for all other values of 'y' the equation 'x(1-y)/y' will be '-ve'?

Also, how can I strengthen my inequalitites knowledge (for GMAT).

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 27245
Followers: 4239

Kudos [?]: 41179 [2] , given: 5674

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  08 Oct 2009, 16:13
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
Syed wrote:
Hi Bunuel!

How did you so quickly come to this conclusion that "for all other values of 'y' the equation 'x(1-y)/y' will be '-ve'?

Also, how can I strengthen my inequalitites knowledge (for GMAT).

OK, first of all get rid of x, it's positive thus won't affect anything in the case of sign. We have (1-y)/y: even not doing any deep inquires it's obvious that we have an inequality with y and knowing nothing about it, so we can not conclude whether (1-y)/y positive or not. But if we just for practice want to determine when inequality (1-y)/y>0 holds true we can do the following:

We have 1-y and y, thus we have two check points 1 and 0 (check points y-1=0 --> y=1 and y=0). We should check three cases for (1-y)/y:

1. y<0 --> denominator y is negative, nominator is positive 1-negative=1+positive=positive, so (1-y)/y negative (positive/negative=negative)

2. 0<y<1 --> denominator y is positive, nominator also positive 1-positive number less than 1=positive, so (1-y)/y positive (positive/positive)

3. y>1 --> denominator y is positive, nominator is negative 1-positive number more than 1=negative, so (1-y)/y negative (negative/positive)

We have that (1-y)/y (and thus x(1-y)/y) is positive when y is in range (0;1) and negative when y<0 or y>1.

So statement (2) gives us two scenarios for x(1-y)/y, hence not sufficient.

Hope now it's clear.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Schools: NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 8

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  08 Oct 2009, 16:42
Indeed! It is clear. Thanks again!
Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 222
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 2

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2009, 10:51
Quick question - couldn't we simply rewrite the question to determine y?

$$X/y>x$$ could be simply rewritten as $$x/x>y$$and therefore is $$1>y$$?

1- Tells us y is less than 1
2 - Tell us nothing about Y

Therefore A?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 27245
Followers: 4239

Kudos [?]: 41179 [1] , given: 5674

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2009, 11:25
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
hogann wrote:
Quick question - couldn't we simply rewrite the question to determine y?

$$X/y>x$$ could be simply rewritten as $$x/x>y$$and therefore is $$1>y$$?

1- Tells us y is less than 1
2 - Tell us nothing about Y

Therefore A?

x>0, (x/y)>x can be simplified this way x(1-y)/y>0 --> as x>0 it doesn't affect the sign of x(1-y)/y>0, so we can get rid of it --> (1-y)/y>0. This is maximum we can to do before considering the statements.

We can NO WAY rewrite x>0, (x/y)>x as "x/x>y --> 1>y" Because at this stage we don't know the sign of y.
_________________
Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 222
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 2

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2009, 11:40
Bunuel wrote:

We can NO WAY rewrite x>0, (x/y)>x as "x/x>y --> 1>y" Because at this stage we don't know the sign of y.

Exactly which is where the conditions 1 and 2 come in. Since we don't know the sign we are now asking.

Is 1 > y?

Condition 1 says yes
Condition 2 mentions nothing about Y

Is 1 > y is much easier to answer than is (x/y)>y
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 27245
Followers: 4239

Kudos [?]: 41179 [1] , given: 5674

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2009, 12:06
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
hogann wrote:
Bunuel wrote:

We can NO WAY rewrite x>0, (x/y)>x as "x/x>y --> 1>y" Because at this stage we don't know the sign of y.

Exactly which is where the conditions 1 and 2 come in. Since we don't know the sign we are now asking.

Is 1 > y?

Condition 1 says yes
Condition 2 mentions nothing about Y

Is 1 > y is much easier to answer than is (x/y)>y

Not so. Let's consider another example:

Is 1/y>1?

(1) y<0.5
(2) y<0.3

According to your logic you would rewrite the statement "is 1/y>1?" as "is y<1"?

Afterwards you consider the statements:

(1) y<0.5 according to your logic you would say: yes y<0.5<1 so sufficient;
(2) y<0.3 according to your logic you would say: yes y<0.3<1 so sufficient;

And thus you would answer D, both are sufficient.

BUT it's WRONG: answer to my rearranged question is E not D

In our initial question it just happened to be that the statements given didn't revealed the mistake you've made in simplification, BUT generally your way is not wright. You can not multiply inequality by the variable not knowing the sign of it.
_________________
Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 222
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 2

Re: x>0 [#permalink]  09 Oct 2009, 12:26
Bunuel wrote:

You can not multiply inequality by the variable not knowing the sign of it.

I get this rule now - the simplification only worked because y could not be negative (as indicated in condition 1)

If y was negative the sign would be flipped.

Intern
Joined: 03 Aug 2013
Posts: 15
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [1] , given: 46

Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]  31 Aug 2013, 13:01
1
KUDOS
considering statement 1, we can say that y>0 and a fraction. As we now know the sign of y we can safe cross multiply. Therefore, the x/y > x evaluates to --> x>xy. If y is a fraction, x is obviously a greater that xy because anything multiplied with fraction is lower than that anything i.e. x. So st1 is sufficient

considering 2 - there is no information given about y so we cannot evaluate and prove x/y > x

Hope it helped

______________________________________
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 32
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [1] , given: 34

Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]  31 Aug 2013, 13:02
1
KUDOS
Hi Bunuel, guys,

I have gone through everyone'e explanations and probably have found a easier solution. What do you guys suggest?

If x > 0

We can rephrase x/y > x ---> 1/y > 1 ( since x is positive just dividing x on both sides)

Hence the question is : 1/y > 1

Statement 1:

0 < y < 1

since y is a proper fraction, therefore ---> 1/proper fraction > 1

Statement 2:

x > 1 --- > no mention of x ---> insufficient
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 277
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Ivey '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 237

Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]  16 Apr 2014, 05:54
irda wrote:
Hi Bunuel, guys,

I have gone through everyone'e explanations and probably have found a easier solution. What do you guys suggest?
If x > 0
We can rephrase x/y > x ---> 1/y > 1 ( since x is positive just dividing x on both sides)
Hence the question is : 1/y > 1
Statement 1:
0 < y < 1
since y is a proper fraction, therefore ---> 1/proper fraction > 1
Statement 2:
x > 1 --- > no mention of x ---> insufficient

I did the same. Is it justified? Experts please comment.
Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ?   [#permalink] 16 Apr 2014, 05:54
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 If xy#0, is x^y > 0 ? 8 20 Jul 2014, 10:23
If xyz ≠ 0, is x(y + z) >= 0? 0 26 Feb 2014, 19:03
4 If xyz ≠ 0, is x(y + z) >= 0? 8 25 Jul 2008, 23:41
Is x+y >0? 1) x/(x+y)>0 2) y/(x+y)>0 3 12 Feb 2006, 01:42
is x+y > 0? 6 22 Jan 2006, 22:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by