Author
Message
SVP

Joined: 05 Jul 2006

Posts: 1513

Followers: 5

Kudos [? ]:
164
[0 ] , given: 39

if x and y are intigers is x^y * y^-x = 1?? 1) x^x > y 2) [#permalink ]
16 Sep 2006, 03:59
Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct

0% (00:00) wrong

based on 0 sessions
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. if x and y are intigers is x^y * y^-x = 1??
1) x^x > y
2) x>y^y

Director

Joined: 13 Nov 2003

Posts: 790

Location: BULGARIA

Followers: 1

Kudos [? ]:
32
[0 ] , given: 0

I used following
A) X^X=Y then stem is =1 but since it is inequality, then it is not = to 1
IMO it should be D

SVP

Joined: 01 May 2006

Posts: 1798

Followers: 10

Kudos [? ]:
115
[0 ] , given: 0

For me, it's (B)
Statment 1:
If x = y = 2, then :
> 2^2 = 4 > 2
> 2^2 / (2^2) = 1
If x = 2 and y = 1, then :
> 2^2 = 4 > 1
> 2^1 / (1^2) = 2
INSUFF
Statment 2:
x > y^y thus x > y (x & y are integers) that means x != y
Hence, x^y * y^-x != 1
SUFF

VP

Joined: 28 Mar 2006

Posts: 1381

Followers: 2

Kudos [? ]:
23
[0 ] , given: 0

Re: Excellent iniquality DS [#permalink ]
16 Sep 2006, 06:23

yezz wrote:

if x and y are intigers is x^y * y^-x = 1?? 1) x^x > y 2) x>y^y

Can some one see if my working is correct?

given x,y are ints

is x^y * y^-x = 1

or x^y / y^x = 1 ===> x^y = y^x

taking logs on both sides we have to prove (y/x)(logx/logy)=1

from (1) we have

xlogx > log y

logx/logy > 1/x

(so we do not know anything about it)

from (2) we have

x>y^y ==> logx > ylogy

Means

logx/logy > y

Then I am lost...

Director

Joined: 13 Nov 2003

Posts: 790

Location: BULGARIA

Followers: 1

Kudos [? ]:
32
[0 ] , given: 0

Hallo trivikram
think that ; or x^y / y^x = 1 ===> x^y = y^x
is NOT correct .It should be (x^y-y^x)/y^x=0 where y^x can not be 0 since division by 0 is not defined

VP

Joined: 28 Mar 2006

Posts: 1381

Followers: 2

Kudos [? ]:
23
[0 ] , given: 0

BG wrote:

Hallo trivikram think that ; or x^y / y^x = 1 ===> x^y = y^x is NOT correct .It should be (x^y-y^x)/y^x=0 where y^x can not be 0 since division by 0 is not defined

But BG from there how do we proceed?

VP

Joined: 21 Aug 2006

Posts: 1025

Followers: 1

Kudos [? ]:
22
[0 ] , given: 0

Re: Excellent iniquality DS [#permalink ]
16 Sep 2006, 07:37

yezz wrote:

if x and y are intigers is x^y * y^-x = 1?? 1) x^x > y 2) x>y^y

The condition x^y * y^-x = 1 will be valid only if x and y are 2 and 4

from statement 2 we can say that, that is not the case. Hence B is the anwer.

_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Senior Manager

Joined: 31 May 2006

Posts: 376

Location: Phoenix AZ

Followers: 1

Kudos [? ]:
14
[0 ] , given: 0

.........................

SVP

Joined: 01 May 2006

Posts: 1798

Followers: 10

Kudos [? ]:
115
[0 ] , given: 0

mailtheguru wrote:

.........................

What's going on ?

Current Student

Joined: 28 Dec 2004

Posts: 3385

Location: New York City

Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

Followers: 14

Kudos [? ]:
204
[0 ] , given: 2

for me B is sufficient...
X and Y are integers... we dont know if they are postive or negative...
x^y * y^-x=1?
(1) x^x>y
well say if x and y=2...then 2^2>2...
2^2*1/(2^2)=1; x=2, y=3 then the stem isnt equal to 1
(2)
x>y^y; so we know that |x|>|y| and they are not equal..therefore the stem will never be 1....
sufficient

Senior Manager

Joined: 31 May 2006

Posts: 376

Location: Phoenix AZ

Followers: 1

Kudos [? ]:
14
[0 ] , given: 0

Fig wrote:

mailtheguru wrote:

.........................

What's going on ?

Got screwed

SVP

Joined: 01 May 2006

Posts: 1798

Followers: 10

Kudos [? ]:
115
[0 ] , given: 0

mailtheguru wrote:

Fig wrote:

mailtheguru wrote:

.........................

What's going on ?

Got screwed

It's one part of the joy of Maths (or DS?

).... One time u another time someone else (this rule works with me as well

)

Senior Manager

Joined: 31 May 2006

Posts: 376

Location: Phoenix AZ

Followers: 1

Kudos [? ]:
14
[0 ] , given: 0

Fig wrote:

mailtheguru wrote:

Fig wrote:

mailtheguru wrote:

.........................

What's going on ?

Got screwed

It's one part of the joy of Maths (or DS?

).... One time u another time someone else (this rule works with me as well

)

yeah, sure.

Where are these questiosn from?

Director

Joined: 06 May 2006

Posts: 780

Followers: 3

Kudos [? ]:
19
[0 ] , given: 0

A very shaky B for me as well...
x^y = y^x
=> ylogx = x logy
=> y/x = logy/logx -- (1)
A# x^x > y
=> xlogx > logy
=> From (1), y/x^2 = logy/xlogx < 1
=> y < x^2
Now, if x=2, we have y = 1, 2, 3... if y = 2 then x^y = y^x, but not in the case of y =1 or 3. Hence not sufficient.
B# x > y^y
=> logx > ylogy
=> from (1), y^2/x = ylogy/logx < 1
=> y^2 < x
Now, if x = 27, we have y = 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5; but the expression in the question does not evaluate to 1 in any of the cases. Hence sufficient.

SVP

Joined: 05 Jul 2006

Posts: 1513

Followers: 5

Kudos [? ]:
164
[0 ] , given: 39

if x and y are intigers is x^y * y^-x = 1??

1) x^x > y

2) x>y^y

rephrase stem x^y *1/y^x = 1 ie: receprocals

This is only possible if x^y = y^x and in turn this is only possible if x=y or x,y belongs to the set {2,4}

from one

x^x > y thus sure x,y are not equall one

x,y could be anything and could be x=4 and y=2 .....insuff

from two

x>y^ythus sure x,y are not equall one and sure /x/> /y/ thus if they are 2,4 x must be the 4 and thus y^y = 4....suff

because now we are sure that the only two conditions that make the assumption true are not valid ( being one or {2,4})

suff

answer is not a shaky b it is B

Last edited by

yezz on 16 Sep 2006, 12:35, edited 2 times in total.

SVP

Joined: 01 May 2006

Posts: 1798

Followers: 10

Kudos [? ]:
115
[0 ] , given: 0

yezz wrote:

if x and y are intigers is x^y * y^-x = 1??

1) x^x > y

2) x>y^y

rephrase stem x^y *1/y^x = 1 ie: receprocals

This is only possible if x^y = y^x and in turn this is only possible if x=y=1 or x,y belongs to the set {2,4} from one

x^x > y thus sure x,y are not equall one

x,y could be anything and could be x=4 and y=2 .....insuff

from two

x>y^ythus sure x,y are not equall one and sure /x/> /y/ thus if they are 2,4 x must be the 4 and thus y^y = 4....suff

because now we are sure that the only two conditions that make the assumption true are not valid ( being one or {2,4})

suff

answer is not a shaky b it is B

Not agree with the bold

x = y makes it

and no restricted values on it apart 0^0 (recently identified as not fitted for GMAT

)

SVP

Joined: 05 Jul 2006

Posts: 1513

Followers: 5

Kudos [? ]:
164
[0 ] , given: 39

come on Fig you ve got to get over this exponent DS ...

and i agree with you on your comment but still it would be insuff

I will edit it

SVP

Joined: 01 May 2006

Posts: 1798

Followers: 10

Kudos [? ]:
115
[0 ] , given: 0

It's the end of my day here

I'm allowed to turn the end of my post to something funny for those who know it

SVP

Joined: 05 Jul 2006

Posts: 1513

Followers: 5

Kudos [? ]:
164
[0 ] , given: 39

Man GMAT is funny

funny wn we do silly mistakes " kinder garten ones" apart from the test

and funny when you laugh yourself to death infront of a hard DS that you ve no clue about

we need those jokes all the time

by the way i like your audi

SVP

Joined: 01 May 2006

Posts: 1798

Followers: 10

Kudos [? ]:
115
[0 ] , given: 0

Ahhh

If u start to speak about Audi... I'm not ready to make an end to this day finally

Frankly, I recommand this brand over the 2 other major german brands

But I try to convince no one

Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 21 posts ]