Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Oct 2012, 10:31

1

This post received KUDOS

voodoochild wrote:

Experts, I liked Walker's method. I chose X = y =1 and got 'none'. However, can we solve this question algebraically?

[Note: x and y are +ve; hence both the sides of inequalities are positive. There shouldn't be any harm in squaring]

#1 - This is straightforward. For #2 - here's what I did: (Sqrt (x) + Sqrt (y))/2 > 1/(Sqrt(x+y)) Square both sides: x + y + 2*sqrt(xy) > 24/(x+y) OR

(x+y)^2 + 2(x+y)Sqrt (xy) > 4

This seems to hold good only when (x+y)^2 is greater than 2. (I am not sure about this one)

III:-

Simplifying, sqrt(x)-sqrt(y)>sqrt(x+y) Now, x and y are positive. Therefore, rHS >0 => Sqrt (x) > sqrt(y)

Also, squaring both the sides, x+y-2sqrt(xy) > x+y => -2sqrt(xy)>0 ====> Impossible for any value of x and y because x and y are positive.

Is this method correct? Please let me know.

[Disclaimer: I wouldn't use this method on the GMAT. This is just for learning.]

II: (x+y)^2 + 2(x+y)Sqrt (xy) > 4 This seems to hold good only when (x+y)^2 is greater than 2.

Why try to figure out when this inequality holds? It is easier to see when it doesn't hold. For example for x and y very close to 0.

III: You cannot square the inequality because you don't know whether x is greater than y or not. If x < y, the left hand side is negative, and obviously it cannot be greater than a positive number on the right hand side. You got "lucky" here, the conclusion is right, but the way you did it, is wrong. Never ever square an expression if you are not absolutely sure that it is positive.

Walker made a good choice, x = y - clearly the inequality cannot hold. Instead of squaring, you can also try another way: Since x and y are both positive, \(\sqrt{x+y}>\sqrt{x}\), therefore, from \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}>\sqrt{x+y}\) we would get that \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}>\sqrt{x}\) or \(-\sqrt{y}>0\), impossible. _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Oct 2012, 10:56

EvaJager wrote:

Why try to figure out when this inequality holds? It is easier to see when it doesn't hold. For example for x and y very close to 0.

III: You cannot square the inequality because you don't know whether x is greater than y or not. If x < y, the left hand side is negative, and obviously it cannot be greater than a positive number on the right hand side. You got "lucky" here, the conclusion is right, but the way you did it, is wrong. Never ever square an expression if you are not absolutely sure that it is positive.

I don't agree because in sqrt(x)-sqrt(y)>sqrt(x+y), x+y is positive. We know that sqrt (x+y) is positive. HEnce, LHS has to be positive. It can't be -ve. X cannot be < Y. That's why both the sides of the inequalities are positive. Hence, we should be able to square them.

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Oct 2012, 12:19

1

This post received KUDOS

voodoochild wrote:

EvaJager wrote:

Why try to figure out when this inequality holds? It is easier to see when it doesn't hold. For example for x and y very close to 0.

III: You cannot square the inequality because you don't know whether x is greater than y or not. If x < y, the left hand side is negative, and obviously it cannot be greater than a positive number on the right hand side. You got "lucky" here, the conclusion is right, but the way you did it, is wrong. Never ever square an expression if you are not absolutely sure that it is positive.

I don't agree because in sqrt(x)-sqrt(y)>sqrt(x+y), x+y is positive. We know that sqrt (x+y) is positive. HEnce, LHS has to be positive. It can't be -ve. X cannot be < Y. That's why both the sides of the inequalities are positive. Hence, we should be able to square them.

Thoughts?

If your chain of thoughts was "if ... (inequality holds) ... then (something must be positive AND I should keep in mind this condition)...then (I can square)...then (I reach something which is not true)...therefore (my initial assumption is wrong, meaning the inequality doesn't necessarily hold)" - in fact is OK. The condition is that x must be greater than y. If the chain of reasoning would have reached at some point a conclusion stating that x is less than y, would you have been able to reach a conclusion, I mean, not to forget, that you started with the opposite?

My point is that if you see on a question a difference, \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}\) which should be positive, why would you continue to do extra work, like squaring? If x is not necessarily greater than y (it is not given), then you should stop. Definitely, the purpose of this question was not to test your algebraic abilities of squaring expressions. You shouldn't do this even when just practicing and learning. The most important thing you can learn from this exercise, is that there are valuable clues on the way and you should develop skills not to miss them. If you just continue like a robot, "there are square roots, we should get rid of them, we should therefore square expressions..." , you don't help your preparation for the real test at all. And with statement II, you could clearly see that squaring and algebraic manipulations don't help, they can even complicate the expressions and make it more difficult to reach a conclusion. _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Last edited by EvaJager on 24 Oct 2012, 01:17, edited 1 time in total.

For #2 - here's what I did: (Sqrt (x) + Sqrt (y))/2 > 1/(Sqrt(x+y)) Square both sides: x + y + 2*sqrt(xy) > 2/(x+y) OR

(x+y)^2 + 2(x+y)Sqrt (xy) > 4

This seems to hold good only when (x+y)^2 is greater than 2. (I am not sure about this one)

A point to note: From where did this inequality come? \(( \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{y})/2 > 1/\sqrt{(x+y)}\) It isn't given to you. They are asking you whether this inequality holds in case x and y are positive.

So what you are trying to figure out is this: Is \(( \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{y})/2 > 1/\sqrt{(x+y)}\)? Since x and y are both positive, both sides of the inequality are positive (on their own). You can square it if you really wish to. It's something like 'is a > b?' given both a and b are positive. If a^2 is greater than b^2, then obviously, a is greater than b.

voodoochild wrote:

III:-

Simplifying, sqrt(x)-sqrt(y)>sqrt(x+y) Now, x and y are positive. Therefore, rHS >0 => Sqrt (x) > sqrt(y)

Also, squaring both the sides, x+y-2sqrt(xy) > x+y => -2sqrt(xy)>0 ====> Impossible for any value of x and y because x and y are positive.

Here your question is: Is \(\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{y}> \sqrt{(x+y)}\)?

Mind you, it is not given to you that the inequality holds. You need to find out whether it does. The LHS can be negative here (in case root x is less than root y) on its own. In that case, the inequality certainly doesn't hold.

It is something like this: Is a > b? b is positive. You don't know about a. You can't square the inequality. You cannot assume that a must be positive since b is positive. Say, if a = -4 and b = 2 (-4)^2 > 2^2 holds even though a is not greater than b. So even if you get that a^2 is in fact greater than b^2, you cannot deduce that a must be greater than b.

Squaring in such a case will only lead to a ton of confusion. Avoid it. _________________

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2012, 10:00

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

Here your question is: Is \(\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{y}> \sqrt{(x+y)}\)?

Mind you, it is not given to you that the inequality holds. You need to find out whether it does. The LHS can be negative here (in case root x is less than root y) on its own. In that case, the inequality certainly doesn't hold.

Karishma, Thanks for your reply. Your replies are always helpful. However, I have a different opinion for two reasons:

#1- We are assuming that the given inequality is TRUE, and then evaluating its correctness. Hence, if x and y are positive, sqrt(x)-sqrt(y) will be positive. If it's -ve then the inequality cannot hold good. That's what happened in the end. #2 - One of the best strategies on MUST BE TRUE questions is to solve the equation as much as possible. There are questions on which plugging-in numbers won't work at all.

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2012, 12:23

1

This post received KUDOS

voodoochild wrote:

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

Here your question is: Is \(\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{y}> \sqrt{(x+y)}\)?

Mind you, it is not given to you that the inequality holds. You need to find out whether it does. The LHS can be negative here (in case root x is less than root y) on its own. In that case, the inequality certainly doesn't hold.

Karishma, Thanks for your reply. Your replies are always helpful. However, I have a different opinion for two reasons:

#1- We are assuming that the given inequality is TRUE, and then evaluating its correctness. Hence, if x and y are positive, sqrt(x)-sqrt(y) will be positive. If it's -ve then the inequality cannot hold good. That's what happened in the end. #2 - One of the best strategies on MUST BE TRUE questions is to solve the equation as much as possible. There are questions on which plugging-in numbers won't work at all.

Thoughts?

#1 There is a question: which must be greater...None of the expressions is guaranteed to be greater than the given expression. \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}\) is positive if and only if \(x>y\). Is this guaranteed? NO! No restriction on \(x\) and \(y\), either one can be greater than the other one, or they can also be equal. Even without further checking, no matter what is the conclusion from further analysis, if the initial condition of \(x>y\) is not guaranteed to hold, the inequality must not hold!!! You got "lucky", because finally it turned out that the inequality cannot hold. But, just hypothetically, if you would have found that the inequality can hold if \(x>y\)? What would have been your answer? That the inequality MUST hold? Again a big NO!!! Because the initial condition of \(x>y\) is not guaranteed to hold!!! In conclusion, it's not worth the whole trouble to check all kinds of other conditions when already the first one must not hold.

#2 Big NO!!! How did you reach this conclusion? Many times in mathematics, to a question whether a certain inequality holds for every value of the variable, it is much easier to find even one particular value for which it doesn't hold, to state with certainty that the inequality doesn't hold for all the values of the variable. As it was the case here in this question. The expressions were deliberately given complicated, with square roots. The test was on whether you are able to evaluate the values of different expressions, to "feel" when one is the smallest, when another one is the greatest... GMAT is testing the flexibility of your mind. You don't do any good to yourself locking your mind on inefficient methods. _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Oct 2012, 17:13

EvaJager wrote:

#1 There is a question: which must be greater...None of the expressions is guaranteed to be greater than the given expression. \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}\) is positive if and only if \(x>y\). Is this guaranteed? NO! No restriction on \(x\) and \(y\), either one can be greater than the other one, or they can also be equal. Even without further checking, no matter what is the conclusion from further analysis, if the initial condition of \(x>y\) is not guaranteed to hold, the inequality must not hold!!! You got "lucky", because finally it turned out that the inequality cannot hold. But, just hypothetically, if you would have found that the inequality can hold if \(x>y\)? What would have been your answer? That the inequality MUST hold? Again a big NO!!! Because the initial condition of \(x>y\) is not guaranteed to hold!!! In conclusion, it's not worth the whole trouble to check all kinds of other conditions when already the first one must not hold.

Eva, I still disagree. Either I am missing something very crucial, or I am not able to express myself properly. I would lean towards the former until the latter is ruled out. Why are we ignoring the RHS side of the inequality? sqrt(x) - sqrt(y) as it is, could be >, =, < 0. I agree. However, with sqrt (x-y) on the RHS, that expression must be greater than zero. if a> sqrt (x) ===> a has to be greater than or equal to 0, irrespective of the value of x. (Let's assume that x is not a complex number ) In the next step, I would do the analysis that you have described : whether X < Y, or X<1 and Y<1 etc. However, while squaring, I can safely assume that sqrt(x) > sqrt(y) because the RHS is +ve.

the main objective in this question is to evaluate whether the inequality MUST BE TRUE. The inequality as it is, could be squared. I am not able to think of an inequality in which I will be 'unlucky'

Regarding #2, we cannot solve many MUST BE TRUE questions using number plugging. Example: if-x-x-x-which-of-the-following-must-be-true-about-x-68886.html In this one, substitution will not work. (try x=0.5 ). One has to solve inequalities to find the roots.

Here your question is: Is \(\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{y}> \sqrt{(x+y)}\)?

Mind you, it is not given to you that the inequality holds. You need to find out whether it does. The LHS can be negative here (in case root x is less than root y) on its own. In that case, the inequality certainly doesn't hold.

Karishma, Thanks for your reply. Your replies are always helpful. However, I have a different opinion for two reasons:

#1- We are assuming that the given inequality is TRUE, and then evaluating its correctness. Hence, if x and y are positive, sqrt(x)-sqrt(y) will be positive. If it's -ve then the inequality cannot hold good. That's what happened in the end. #2 - One of the best strategies on MUST BE TRUE questions is to solve the equation as much as possible. There are questions on which plugging-in numbers won't work at all.

Thoughts?

Having interacted with you over the past few months, I think that you genuinely care about having strong concepts. Hence, I will try to explain in detail the points you are missing (in my opinion):

#2 - One of the best strategies on MUST BE TRUE questions is to solve the equation as much as possible. There are questions on which plugging-in numbers won't work at all.

Absolutely! I dislike number plugging. For most questions, I follow the strategy of thinking logically; I try to apply conceptual understanding to questions. That said, in some questions, number plugging is what works. For 'MUST BE TRUE' questions, number plugging is useless if the relation actually must be true. You cannot plug in every number and check to establish that the relation is indeed true. So once you get that the relation holds for numbers from different ranges, you need to start thinking logically why it must hold for all numbers. On the other hand, if you can find one number for which the relation doesn't hold true, you are done! You already know that the relation doesn't hold for all numbers. Hence, in some cases, the most successful strategy is when you can see that the relation does not hold for an easy number e.g. 0 or 1 etc. Hence, number plugging has its uses, limited they may be. In the context of this question, what I see is that you are removing the roots and then plugging in numbers (in statement II). Removing the roots didn't actually give you the range, right? Statement III worked out well but it was a fluke. I will explain this more in your next point.

#1- We are assuming that the given inequality is TRUE, and then evaluating its correctness. Hence, if x and y are positive, sqrt(x)-sqrt(y) will be positive. If it's -ve then the inequality cannot hold good. That's what happened in the end.

Fine. Let's assume that the inequality holds (statement III). We get that LHS must be positive. We do some algebra and we get that -2sqrt(xy)>0 which we know is not possible. This proves to us that the inequality definitely does not hold i.e. LHS is not greater than RHS for any value of x and y (x and y are both positive). The reason why this worked out is that the inequality does not hold for any value of x and y i.e. it is definitely false. It is possible that you get an inequality which holds for some values and does not for others. In that case, you would again need to plug in numbers and check (like you did in statement 2). Our question was whether the inequality holds for all values. In statement 3, by assuming that it does, we were able to prove that it doesn't hold for any value. The strategy fails in case it holds for some values and does not for others (like it did for statement 2).

Now, what irks me about assuming that the inequality holds and squaring? Let me show you using a simple example. Say, my question is: Is A > B? (A and B are expressions using x and y. Say, the values A can take are A>2 or A < -2 and the values B can take are 0 < B < 2. But of course, this is not given to you and the expressions are complex so you cant really see it either)

You assume that A > B and square it. A^2 > B^2 Not you plug in values for x and y in the inequality and you see that for every value you put in, A^2 is greater than B^2 (it will be because of the range of values A and B can take). What does it imply? Does it mean that A > B for every value of x and y? But it is not true. A is not greater than B for every value of x and y. Hence, the entire exercise could be misleading.

Bottom line: Try to avoid assuming that the relation questioned actually holds true. (It might work splendidly in rare situations but more often than not, it will confuse you to no end) _________________

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Oct 2012, 01:10

1

This post received KUDOS

voodoochild wrote:

EvaJager wrote:

#1 There is a question: which must be greater...None of the expressions is guaranteed to be greater than the given expression. \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}\) is positive if and only if \(x>y\). Is this guaranteed? NO! No restriction on \(x\) and \(y\), either one can be greater than the other one, or they can also be equal. Even without further checking, no matter what is the conclusion from further analysis, if the initial condition of \(x>y\) is not guaranteed to hold, the inequality must not hold!!! You got "lucky", because finally it turned out that the inequality cannot hold. But, just hypothetically, if you would have found that the inequality can hold if \(x>y\)? What would have been your answer? That the inequality MUST hold? Again a big NO!!! Because the initial condition of \(x>y\) is not guaranteed to hold!!! In conclusion, it's not worth the whole trouble to check all kinds of other conditions when already the first one must not hold.

Eva, I still disagree. Either I am missing something very crucial, or I am not able to express myself properly. I would lean towards the former until the latter is ruled out. Why are we ignoring the RHS side of the inequality? sqrt(x) - sqrt(y) as it is, could be >, =, < 0. I agree. However, with sqrt (x-y) on the RHS, that expression must be greater than zero. if a> sqrt (x) ===> a has to be greater than or equal to 0, irrespective of the value of x. (Let's assume that x is not a complex number ) In the next step, I would do the analysis that you have described : whether X < Y, or X<1 and Y<1 etc. However, while squaring, I can safely assume that sqrt(x) > sqrt(y) because the RHS is +ve.

the main objective in this question is to evaluate whether the inequality MUST BE TRUE. The inequality as it is, could be squared. I am not able to think of an inequality in which I will be 'unlucky'

Regarding #2, we cannot solve many MUST BE TRUE questions using number plugging. Example: if-x-x-x-which-of-the-following-must-be-true-about-x-68886.html In this one, substitution will not work. (try x=0.5 ). One has to solve inequalities to find the roots.

I could be wrong.

Thoughts?

thanks

You wrote: "the main objective in this question is to evaluate whether the inequality MUST BE TRUE."

Meaning of the word whether:

whether Conjunction: Expressing a doubt or choice between alternatives: "he seemed undecided whether to go or stay". Expressing an inquiry or investigation (often used in indirect questions): "I'll see whether she's at home".

Look at the following question: "If \(a,\,b\) and \(c\) are non-zero integers, must \(a - b\) be greater than \(c^2\)?" What would be your approach? You don't need to square here anything. So, what's your reasoning? Or what should be your reasoning? You could say that \(c^2\) is always positive, then \(a-b\) must be positive, but this can be true or not. Therefore, the answer should be NO, \(a-b\) must not necessarily be greater than \(c^2\).

So why cannot you apply the above reasoning when instead of \(a-b\) you have \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}\)? The first stage is the same, you conclude that \(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}\) must be positive. But this is not granted!!! Why do you continue?

Try to apply your squaring approach to this: For \(x\) and \(y\) positive, must \(x-y\) be greater than \(\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}\)? By the way, a math question (not on the GMAT), would never been formulated in this way - MUST BE... It would simply read "Is \(x-y>\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}\) for all positive \(x\) and \(y\)?" Would this wording of the question change your approach? _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 20:15

Eva and Karishma,

Thanks for your detailed reply. I am sorry for late reply. You are correct in that one shouldn't conclude from A^2 > B^2 that A > B. That's not infer-able. I think that in this discussion, we are confusing "given" and "question" -- While solving or simplifying the inequality or any question , we have to assume that the equation/inequality holds good.

For instance, (given some condition); is it true that 4x + 4 > 3x ? The first step would be to simplify the equation to x>-4? Correct?

OR If the inequality requires cross multiplication, say, 4/x > 3/y; y>0; x!=0; Here, I would solve the equation with an assumption that x >0; I wouldn't assume that's THE ONLY possibility. I would also solve the equation with an assumption that x<0;

In the above question, I was trying to solve the equation and see under what conditions that equation holds good. It turns out, from our discussion, that the second inequality doesn't hold good. Let's assume that the inequality holds good i.e. xv>0. However, there is also an underlying assumption that x>y (we assumed that x-y> square of a number -- I think that this assumption is CRUCIAL which I missed initially. ); Hence, even though xy> 0 is true, that doesn't mean that xy>0 is a sufficient condition because the necessary condition x>y may not satisfied.

Method1: One of the methods is to plugin number. MEthod2: Another would be to draw a line + parabolic curve. However, finding focus points etc would be difficult. MEthod3: Let's try by squaring. (Let's hold on to this)

Method4 :Let's first analyze the inequality to see what's going on:

Possible values of x : X<0 |X=0| 2>X>0 |2|X>2 X<0 => not possible 0<x<2 => (x is positive integer => x=1) => substitute in the equation => 1<2.5(1-2) => not possible. X=2 => sqrt (2) ~1.4 <0 not possible x>=3 => sqrt(3) < 2.5(3)-5 -> yes, true.

You see that by solving this inequality using analytical method, we can easily arrive at the answer even without looking at the two answer choices DS question! I didn't have to worry anything about primes etc.

Now, let's try my favorite square method (squaring an inequality is like an attempt to play blues chords on a major scale on your musical instrument--it's fun. Just as not all songs permit us to do that, we shouldn't do it. Now onward, I will refrain from squaring an inequality. I would probably try to do number plugging first. ) 2.5(x-2) > sqrt(x) 6.25(x-2)^2 > x Solving and re-arranging x=2.65 or x=1.5; From our analysis, we know that 1.5 is not possible; hence, X> 2.65! This is also same as X>=3 (x = integer)

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Oct 2012, 03:12

1

This post received KUDOS

voodoochild wrote:

Eva and Karishma,

Thanks for your detailed reply. I am sorry for late reply. You are correct in that one shouldn't conclude from A^2 > B^2 that A > B. That's not infer-able. I think that in this discussion, we are confusing "given" and "question" -- While solving or simplifying the inequality or any question , we have to assume that the equation/inequality holds good.

For instance, (given some condition); is it true that 4x + 4 > 3x ? The first step would be to simplify the equation to x>-4? Correct?

OR If the inequality requires cross multiplication, say, 4/x > 3/y; y>0; x!=0; Here, I would solve the equation with an assumption that x >0; I wouldn't assume that's THE ONLY possibility. I would also solve the equation with an assumption that x<0;

In the above question, I was trying to solve the equation and see under what conditions that equation holds good. It turns out, from our discussion, that the second inequality doesn't hold good. Let's assume that the inequality holds good i.e. xv>0. However, there is also an underlying assumption that x>y (we assumed that x-y> square of a number -- I think that this assumption is CRUCIAL which I missed initially. ); Hence, even though xy> 0 is true, that doesn't mean that xy>0 is a sufficient condition because the necessary condition x>y may not satisfied.

Method1: One of the methods is to plugin number. MEthod2: Another would be to draw a line + parabolic curve. However, finding focus points etc would be difficult. MEthod3: Let's try by squaring. (Let's hold on to this)

Method4 :Let's first analyze the inequality to see what's going on:

Possible values of x : X<0 |X=0| 2>X>0 |2|X>2 X<0 => not possible 0<x<2 => (x is positive integer => x=1) => substitute in the equation => 1<2.5(1-2) => not possible. X=2 => sqrt (2) ~1.4 <0 not possible x>=3 => sqrt(3) < 2.5(3)-5 -> yes, true.

You see that by solving this inequality using analytical method, we can easily arrive at the answer even without looking at the two answer choices DS question! I didn't have to worry anything about primes etc.

Now, let's try my favorite square method (squaring an inequality is like an attempt to play blues chords on a major scale on your musical instrument--it's fun. Just as not all songs permit us to do that, we shouldn't do it. Now onward, I will refrain from squaring an inequality. I would probably try to do number plugging first. ) 2.5(x-2) > sqrt(x) 6.25(x-2)^2 > x Solving and re-arranging x=2.65 or x=1.5; From our analysis, we know that 1.5 is not possible; hence, X> 2.65! This is also same as X>=3 (x = integer)

Thoughts?

I think that in this discussion, we are confusing "given" and "question" -- While solving or simplifying the inequality or any question , we have to assume that the equation/inequality holds good.

I can speak just for myself, and I can assure you that I am not confusing between "given" and "question". It looks that you have major problems in distinguishing between solving an inequality and testing whether some inequalities hold for certain given values. With the cited question, you missed the point again.

I don't think there is anything left I can help you with. _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Re: If x and y are positive, which of the following must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jan 2014, 23:55

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

If x and y are positive, which of the following must be greater than \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x+y}}\)?

I. \(\frac{\sqrt{x+y}}{2}\) II. \(\frac{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}}{2}\) III. \(\frac{\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}}{x+y}\)

A. I only B. II only C. III only D. I and II only E. None

III. We have x+y+2√x√y>x+y ….. since x, y are positive, 2√x√y>0) (√x+√y)^2>(√(x+y))^2 (√x+√y)>√(x+y)…taking square-root is valid since (√x+√y) and √(x+y) each is positive (√x+√y)/(x+y)>√(x+y)/(x+y)..dividing by (x+y) is valid since (x+y) is positive (√x+√y)/(x+y)>1/√(x+y) Hence III must be greater than 1/√(x+y) Correct answer C.

Problem looks weired. Please post the OA and official explaination.

Refer to the Walker's solution: it's fast (~30 sec) and elegant.

III. We have x+y+2√x√y>x+y ….. since x, y are positive, 2√x√y>0) (√x+√y)^2>(√(x+y))^2 (√x+√y)>√(x+y)…taking square-root is valid since (√x+√y) and √(x+y) each is positive (√x+√y)/(x+y)>√(x+y)/(x+y)..dividing by (x+y) is valid since (x+y) is positive (√x+√y)/(x+y)>1/√(x+y) Hence III must be greater than 1/√(x+y) Correct answer C. Where am I wrong Bunuel?

Let's consider original statement: \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x+y}}\)

How can we approach the problem fast? Let's see when the original statement is very large : x,y ---> 0 and \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x+y}}\) goes to infinity.

Nice approach... I think your first two lines given above are sufficient to answer the question. If the given expression \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x+y}}\) approaches infinity for some values of x and y, there is no way any other expression can be always greater than this expression. Some other expression can equal this expression by approaching infinity for the same values of x and y (e.g. the third expression), but cannot be greater than this.

So the moment one realizes that \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x+y}}\) tends to infinity, the answer is clear.

III. We have x+y+2√x√y>x+y ….. since x, y are positive, 2√x√y>0) (√x+√y)^2>(√(x+y))^2 (√x+√y)>√(x+y)…taking square-root is valid since (√x+√y) and √(x+y) each is positive (√x+√y)/(x+y)>√(x+y)/(x+y)..dividing by (x+y) is valid since (x+y) is positive (√x+√y)/(x+y)>1/√(x+y) Hence III must be greater than 1/√(x+y) Correct answer C. Where am I wrong Karishma?

Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...

As you leave central, bustling Tokyo and head Southwest the scenery gradually changes from urban to farmland. You go through a tunnel and on the other side all semblance...

Ghibli studio’s Princess Mononoke was my first exposure to Japan. I saw it at a sleepover with a neighborhood friend after playing some video games and I was...