Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Data Sufficiency [#permalink]
13 Sep 2005, 10:09

Edited I still select D, it is one of those question where both conditions give diff answers

COndition 1, 3^4 has 5 factors

Conditon 2, if x is a product of 3 prime number, it has 8 factors, the three prime numbers, the number got by multiplying among them, 1 and itself... _________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Last edited by ranga41 on 13 Sep 2005, 11:31, edited 1 time in total.

The OA is D, but the question I have is regarding statement 1. Statement 1 says that X is divisible by 1 more positive integer than 3^4. Doesn't that mean that the other integer could be....say "10" which could add two additional "factors" to X? In the end we are looking for the number of factors, not the number of integers...right?? _________________

Actually the question stem says.. 1 more positive integer than 3^4 IS.
3^4 is divisible by all its factors. I/e 5, one more than 5 IS 6. _________________

3^4 has five factors, 1,3,9,27,81. So one more than that is six.

If x = pqr then x has eight factors 1,p,q,r,pq,pr,qr,pqr

I stand my reply of a couple of days ago.

What slightly concerns me is that even though I believe that D is the correct answer and both answers are sufficient, the two answers given are different above - 6 and 8. So that makes me concerned that something has gone wrong in the question setting.

3^4 has five factors, 1,3,9,27,81. So one more than that is six.

If x = pqr then x has eight factors 1,p,q,r,pq,pr,qr,pqr

I stand my reply of a couple of days ago.

What slightly concerns me is that even though I believe that D is the correct answer and both answers are sufficient, the two answers given are different above - 6 and 8. So that makes me concerned that something has gone wrong in the question setting.

I agree. One of those cases where each statement gives a different answer yet satisfies the sufficiency. _________________

The OA is wrong. It has to be only. The formula to calculate the number of factors/divisors of a number is (p+1)(q+1).... where p, q are exponents of the prime factors

In A, we do not know if the positive integer is a prime number or not.

3^4 X 5^1 - in this case the # of factors is 10
3^4 X 2^4 - in this case the # of factors is 25

The OA is wrong. It has to be only. The formula to calculate the number of factors/divisors of a number is (p+1)(q+1).... where p, q are exponents of the prime factors

In A, we do not know if the positive integer is a prime number or not.

3^4 X 5^1 - in this case the # of factors is 10 3^4 X 2^4 - in this case the # of factors is 25

So only B can provide the value.

GA

It always concerns me when people say the OA is wrong, because usually the OA is right and they are wrong.

If (1) is true then x can't possibly be prime.

All we know is that it has one more factor than 3^4 has.
That is sufficient.

Your formula is correct that 3^4 has 5 factors.
But actually we don't even need to know that, we just need to know that it can be determined, and hence the number of factors of x.

The OA is wrong. It has to be only. The formula to calculate the number of factors/divisors of a number is (p+1)(q+1).... where p, q are exponents of the prime factors

In A, we do not know if the positive integer is a prime number or not.

3^4 X 5^1 - in this case the # of factors is 10
3^4 X 2^4 - in this case the # of factors is 25

If x is 3^4* 5^1, then x is divisible by 10 positive integers- 4 more than 3^4 not 1 as question states.

and moreover, it is not necessary that x can be of the form 3^4*M. The question just says x is divisible by ONE more positive integer than 3^4.

safe.txmblr Can business make a difference in the great problems that we face? My own view is nuanced. I think business potentially has a significant role to play...

safe.txmblr Rebecca Henderson on the viability of the purpose-driven firm: We don’t want business people making policy...but on the other hand, what can business people do to...