Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

I like the approach Durgesh uses for these problems. When the question states "If...", make it where that condition of "if" creates the universe of numbers which we will deal with when we get to the statements.

So, if x is a prime number creates a universe of only prime numbers. And "What is x?" means we're trying to determine if we can narrow the available choice of x down to a single value.

Prime numbers...2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23. We've gone high enough since we can see from (1) that one condition imposed is x < 15.

so (1), if x < 15, we still have five options, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11. This doens't narrow the choices down to a single value. INSUFFICIENT.

(2) X is a multiple of 5. We're still dealing with the "universe" of prime numbers. The only multiple of 5 we see in the "universe" is 5. so the answer must be B.

Since one of the statements is sufficient alone, we do not need to consider the statements together. _________________

------------------------------------ J Allen Morris **I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$.

"Multiples multiply out from an integer and are therefore greater than or equal to that integer."

Therefore 0 would not be a multiple of 5! Correct me if Im wrong!

That is not true- if that's what the MGMAT guide says, they have it wrong, as a glance at any proper math book will demonstrate. The multiples of 5 are all numbers 5*x, where x is an integer, positive or negative (or zero):

...-10, -5, 0, 5, 10, ...

On the real GMAT, however, questions about divisibility and multiples are almost always restricted to positive integers- they will begin questions by saying 'If x is a positive integer...', so you probably won't need to worry about negative multiples on the test. _________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

gmatclubot

Re: Error on Kaplan CAT?
[#permalink]
31 Aug 2008, 08:13