Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Notice that the RHS (right hand side) of the expression is always positive (\(2^x>0\)), but the LHS is positive when \(x>0\) (\(x>0\) --> \(x*|x|=x^2\)), negative when \(x<0\) (\(x<0\) --> \(x*|x|=-x^2\)) and equals to zero when \(x={0}\).

(1) x < 0. According to the above \(x*|x|<0<2^x\). Sufficient.

(2) x = -10. The same here \(x*|x|=-100<0<\frac{1}{2^{10}}\). Sufficient.

OA is D for the following reasons: When you first see a DS question, see if there is anyway to simplify the question stem In this case, since |x| is positive, we can divide both sides by |x| giving us a new question stem --> is x < 2?

S1: x<0, therefore x must be <2 = sufficient S2: x = -10 and -10 < 2 = sufficient

OA is D for the following reasons: When you first see a DS question, see if there is anyway to simplify the question stem In this case, since |x| is positive, we can divide both sides by |x| giving us a new question stem --> is x < 2?

S1: x<0, therefore x must be <2 = sufficient S2: x = -10 and -10 < 2 = sufficient

Let me know if this helps!

The OA is wrong here because of the following reasons:

(1) if x=-10 then -100<-20, on the other hand if x= -1, x<0 then the inequality changes from < to >, namely, -1 > -2 ; This statement is absolutely insufficient!

For x to be Negative LHS i.e. x|x| will always be NEGATIVE and 2^x will be positive for any value of x i.e. x|x|<2^x will always be true SUFFICIENT

Statement 1: x = -10 For x =-10 LHS i.e. x|x| will always be NEGATIVE (-100) and 2^x will be positive for given x (1/2^10) i.e. x|x|<2^x will always be true SUFFICIENT

Hi, we have an equation and the RHS 2^x will be positive irrespective of value of x and LHS xlxl will depend on the value of x.. 1) x is -ive .. so LHS is -ive and RHS is +ive.. suff 2) x=-10... again LHS is -ive and RHS is +ive.. suff ans D
_________________

Re: If x is an integer, is x|x|<2^x ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Apr 2016, 14:22

This question can be solved as follows.

stmt1) it says that x /x/ < 2^x. and also we are told that x< 0. So if x is zero and the abs of x is always positive then we know that x/x/ will be negative. In addition to that, we know that 2^negative number will be positive because it will be in the form of 1/2^x, it will be less than 1 but it will be greater than a negative number. So stmt1 is SUFF.

stmt2) this is a repetition of stmt1 because the left side is negative and the right side is positive. SUFF.

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...