Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 04 Sep 2015, 22:07
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If x is an integer, then x(x 1)(x k) must be evenly

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

If x is an integer, then x(x 1)(x k) must be evenly [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 09:42
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

(A) -4
(B) -2
(C) -1
(D) 2
(E) 5

Any nice n fast way to solve this? Took way too long for me..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 160
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 09:55
Answer is -2.

Product of any 3 consequetive numbers is divisible by 3.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 272
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 10:00
just plug either -1 or 2 in and you'll see that it's -2
the trick is in word must(meaning it has to work for any number)
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 10:06
Sergey_is_cool wrote:
just plug either -1 or 2 in and you'll see that it's -2
the trick is in word must(meaning it has to work for any number)


i did start plugging in, both for k and different values for x.. just took too long..
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1146
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Re: PS: Divisible by 3 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 10:49
ani wrote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

(A) -4
(B) -2
(C) -1
(D) 2
(E) 5

Any nice n fast way to solve this? Took way too long for me..


I don't understand the except part ? if k = -2 and x = 3 then

3*2*5 = 30 which is divisable by 3.

what am I'm doing wrong ?

:shock:
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: PS: Divisible by 3 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 12:12
KillerSquirrel wrote:
ani wrote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

(A) -4
(B) -2
(C) -1
(D) 2
(E) 5

Any nice n fast way to solve this? Took way too long for me..


I don't understand the except part ? if k = -2 and x = 3 then

3*2*5 = 30 which is divisable by 3.

what am I'm doing wrong ?

:shock:


We just need to prove that if k = -2, the expression is NOT divisible by 3 for SOME value of x (when x = 2, for example)
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3387
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 199 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 12:51
i follow that any 3 consecutiv numbers are divisible by 3..but how come k=-4 doesnt work??

maybe i am brain dead right now..but i am not following the question..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 236
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 13:48
this is da kind of problem that takes you lots of time to solve if you do not know that 0ddx0dd=Odd so the last term must be odd also and for it comes -2
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 220
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 13:58
let m=x*(x – 1)*(x – k)

m will be surly divisible by 3 is k = 2
coz product of any three consecutive number will always be divisible by three.
1*2*3.....11*12*13........99*100*101

now que asks for what all valuse of k...m will be divisible by 3.
let assume that x and x-1 are not divisible by 3.else for any value to k….m will be divisible.
so we can have x-2 as value divisible by 3.
now subtracting or adding multiple 3 to x-2 will always give a numbers divisible by 3.

x+1, x+4,x-5...so k can be 2,-4,-1,-5..but not -2
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1146
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 20:23
apache wrote:
let m=x*(x – 1)*(x – k)

m will be surly divisible by 3 is k = 2
coz product of any three consecutive number will always be divisible by three.
1*2*3.....11*12*13........99*100*101

now que asks for what all valuse of k...m will be divisible by 3.
let assume that x and x-1 are not divisible by 3.else for any value to k….m will be divisible.
so we can have x-2 as value divisible by 3.
now subtracting or adding multiple 3 to x-2 will always give a numbers divisible by 3.

x+1, x+4,x-5...so k can be 2,-4,-1,-5..but not -2


sorry to ask again

but I can't understand this question :?

if x=3 won't then the therm x*(x – 1)*(x – k) will be divisable by 3

no matter what k is ?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 220
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 May 2007, 20:54
squirrel,
from my previous post.....let assume that x and x-1 are not divisible by 3.else for any value to k….m will be divisible.

if we assume x or x-1 is divsible by 3 then que stands null and void.
as you rightly pointed that for any value of k ,term will be divisible.
hope this clears your doubt.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1146
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 May 2007, 03:18
apache wrote:
squirrel,
from my previous post.....let assume that x and x-1 are not divisible by 3.else for any value to k….m will be divisible.

if we assume x or x-1 is divsible by 3 then que stands null and void.
as you rightly pointed that for any value of k ,term will be divisible.
hope this clears your doubt.


didn't saw that ! thanks apache :)
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3387
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 199 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 15 May 2007, 06:48
today is a new day..and now i get it ...apache ..excellent explanation...

:)
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3387
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 199 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 16 May 2007, 09:10
I dont think this is a valid GMAT question, cause as KS pointed K, K-1 could be divisible by 3...we just dont know..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 May 2007, 09:29
fresinha12 wrote:
I dont think this is a valid GMAT question, cause as KS pointed K, K-1 could be divisible by 3...we just dont know..


it is a valid question. agreed x can be 3 but what if x is 5 ? the question asks about the whole expression ! and remember x * (x+1) * (x+2) can always be divided by 3.
  [#permalink] 16 May 2007, 09:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If x is an integer, then x(x 1)(x k) must be evenly

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.