If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible : GMAT Problem Solving (PS)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 04 Dec 2016, 12:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 537
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 2859 [2] , given: 217

If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2012, 14:49
2
KUDOS
31
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:17) correct 37% (01:24) wrong based on 718 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A. -4
B. -2
C. -1
D. 2
E. 5

[Reveal] Spoiler:
The OA is B. I am trying to use the concept of consecutive numbers but got stuck. Can someone please help?

Question says x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three which means x(x-1) (x-k) should be consecutive.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3628
Followers: 1243

Kudos [?]: 5623 [13] , given: 60

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2012, 15:17
13
KUDOS
Expert's post
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this.

The rule that the product of three consecutive integers is a good start, but not the be all and end all.

number = x(x – 1)(x – k)

So far, we have integer x and one less that it (x - 1), so we could go down one more, or up one from x --

k = 2 ----> x(x – 1)(x – 2)

k = -1 ----> x(x – 1)(x + 1)

Now, we don't know which of the three factors are divisible by 3 -- x, or (x - 1), or the (x - k). If it's either of the first two, then we're golden, and k doesn't matter. But pretend that neither x nor (x - 1) is divisible by 3, then we are dependent on that last factor. Well, if (x - 2) is a multiple of three, we should be able to add or subtract three and still get a multiple of three.

(x - 2) - 3 = (x - 5)

(x - 5) - 3 = (x - 8)

(x - 2) + 3 = (x + 1), which we have already

(x + 1) + 3 = (x + 4)

(x + 3) + 3 = (x + 7)

So, for divisibility purposes, (x - 8), (x - 5), (x - 2), (x + 1), (x + 4), (x + 7) are all equivalent -- if any one of them is a multiple of three, all the others are. (You can check that the difference between any two is a multiple of 3.) BTW, if they are not divisible by three, then they all would have equal remainders if divided by three.

Back to the question:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT
A)-4
B)-2
C)-1
D) 2
E) 5

All of those choices give us a term on our list except for (B) -2.

BTW, notice all the answer choices are spaced apart by three except for (B).

Does that make sense? Please do not hesitate to ask if you have any questions.

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 35843
Followers: 6836

Kudos [?]: 89845 [10] , given: 10381

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2012, 15:06
10
KUDOS
Expert's post
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
enigma123 wrote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A)-4
B)-2
C)-1
D) 2
E) 5

The OA is B. I am trying to use the concept of consecutive numbers but got stuck. Can someone please help?

Question says x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three which means x(x-1) (x-k) should be consecutive.

We have the product of 3 integers: (x-1)x(x-k).

Note that the product of 3 integers is divisible by 3 if at least one multiple is divisible by 3. Now, to guarantee that at least one integer out of x, (x – 1), and (x – k) is divisible by 3 these numbers must have different remainders upon division by 3, meaning that one of them should have remainder of 1, another reminder of 2 and the last one remainder of 0, so be divisible by 3.

Next, if k=-2 then we'll have (x-1)x(x+2)=(x-1)x(x-1+3) --> which means that (x-1) and (x+2) will have the same remainder upon division by 3. Thus for k=-2 we won't be sure whether (x-1)x(x-k) is divisible by 3.

30 second approach: 4 out of 5 values of k from answer choices must guarantee divisibility of some expression by 3. Now, these 4 values of k in answer choices must have some pattern: if we get rid of -2 then -4, -1, 2, and 5 creating arithmetic progression with common difference of 3, so -2 is clearly doesn't belong to this pattern.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Posts: 102
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.9
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 82 [8] , given: 19

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2014, 05:45
8
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I tried the problem in a different way:

for any number to be divisible by 3, the sum of the integers in the number should be a factor of 3.

Taking the sum of x, (x-1) and (x-k) we have:

x+x-1+x-k = 3x-1-k

now looking at the choices

k = -4 => sum = 3x+3 --> divisible by 3
k = -2 => sum = 3x+1 --> not divisible by 3
k = -1 => sum = 3x --> divisible by 3
k = 2 => sum = 3x-3 --> divisible by 3
k = 5 ==> sum = 3x-6 --> divisible by 3

Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 612
WE: Science (Education)
Followers: 97

Kudos [?]: 865 [7] , given: 43

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2012, 22:10
7
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
enigma123 wrote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A. -4
B. -2
C. -1
D. 2
E. 5

The OA is B. I am trying to use the concept of consecutive numbers but got stuck. Can someone please help?

Question says x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three which means x(x-1) (x-k) should be consecutive.

Since this is a multiple choice GMAT question, you can pick a particular value for x such that neither x, nor x-1 is divisible by 3 and start checking the answers.
In the given situation, choose for example x = 2 and check when 2 - k is not divisible by 3.
(A) 2 - (-4) = 6 NO
(B) 2 - (-2) = 4 BINGO!

_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [2] , given: 0

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2012, 15:34
2
KUDOS
This is my 1st post finally thought of jumping in instead of just being an observer
I attacked this problem in a simple way. As it states it is divisible by 3
that means both x & (x-1) cannot be a multiple of 3 otherwise whatever the value of k it will be still divisible by 3
so plugging in number i chose 5 in this case you can establish answer is -2 does not fit...
Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 612
WE: Science (Education)
Followers: 97

Kudos [?]: 865 [1] , given: 43

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2012, 02:56
1
KUDOS
Avantika5 wrote:
I too solved it using a value for x =2, but I am not sure if is it better to solve using value for such questions or otherwise.

On the GMAT, is definitely the fastest way to solve it. Being a multiple choice question, you can be sure that there is a unique correct answer. And in the given situation, the only issue is to choose for x values such that neither x, nor x - 1 is divisible by 3.
It won't harm to understand and know to use the properties of consecutive integers presented in the other posts . They can be useful any time.
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 227
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 334 [1] , given: 46

If x is an integer.then x(x-1)(x-k) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2013, 09:45
1
KUDOS
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT
(A)-4
(B)-2
(C)-1
(D)2
(E)5

Need help..............
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 35843
Followers: 6836

Kudos [?]: 89845 [1] , given: 10381

Re: If x is an integer.then x(x-1)(x-k) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2013, 09:54
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
mun23 wrote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT
(A)-4
(B)-2
(C)-1
(D)2
(E)5

Need help..............

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.
_________________
VP
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 1432
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 65

Kudos [?]: 1339 [1] , given: 42

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2015, 04:49
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
santorasantu wrote:
Quote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A. -4
B. -2
C. -1
D. 2
E. 5

I tried the problem in a different way:

for any number to be divisible by 3, the sum of the integers in the number should be a factor of 3.

Taking the sum of x, (x-1) and (x-k) we have:

x+x-1+x-k = 3x-1-k

now looking at the choices

k = -4 => sum = 3x+3 --> divisible by 3
k = -2 => sum = 3x+1 --> not divisible by 3
k = -1 => sum = 3x --> divisible by 3
k = 2 => sum = 3x-3 --> divisible by 3
k = 5 ==> sum = 3x-6 --> divisible by 3

Just refining the highlighted language and presenting another view to del with this problem

CONCEPT1:For any number to be divisible by 3, the sum of the Digits of the Number should be a Multiple of 3.

CONCEPT2: Product of any three consecutive Integers always include one muliple of 3 hence product of any three consecutive Integers is always a Multiple of 3

CONCEPT3: If a Number "w" is a Multiple of 3 then any number at a difference of 3 or multiple of 3 from "w" will also be a multiple of 3 i.e. If w is a multiple of 3 then (w+3), (w-3), (w+6), (w-6) etc. will all be Multiples of 3

Here, I see that x(x – 1) is a product of two consecutive Integers but if another Number next to them is obtained then x(x – 1)(x – k) will certainly be a multiple of 3 [as per Concept2 mentioned above]

for x(x – 1)(x – k) to be a product of 3 consecutive integers,

(x – k) should be either (x - 2) i.e. k=2
OR
(x – k) should be either (x - 5) i.e. k=5 [Using Concept3]
OR
(x – k) should be either (x + 1) i.e. k=-1
OR
(x – k) should be either (x + 4) i.e. k=-4 [Using Concept3]

This Eliminates options A, C D and E

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

_________________

Prosper!!!
GMATinsight
Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha
e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com
Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772
http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

Feel free to give a Kudos if it is a useful post .

Director
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 537
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 2859 [0], given: 217

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2012, 15:09
Thanks very much for a thorough explanation.
_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Director
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 537
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 2859 [0], given: 217

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2012, 15:18
Thanks Mike. Really appreciate your solution too.
_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Director
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 537
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 2859 [0], given: 217

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2012, 15:37
Thanks and welcome to GMAT Club Azim. I am sure you will have a great experience from a very helpful community.
_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Intern
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 11
GMAT 1: Q45 V45
GMAT 2: Q51 V46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2012, 17:59
Bunuel wrote:
enigma123 wrote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A)-4
B)-2
C)-1
D) 2
E) 5

The OA is B. I am trying to use the concept of consecutive numbers but got stuck. Can someone please help?

Question says x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three which means x(x-1) (x-k) should be consecutive.

We have the product of 3 integers: (x-1)x(x-k).

Note that the product of 3 integers is divisible by 3 if at least one multiple is divisible by 3. Now, to guarantee that at least one integer out of x, (x – 1), and (x – k) is divisible by 3 these numbers must have different remainders upon division by 3, meaning that one of them should have remainder of 1, another reminder of 2 and the last one remainder of 0, so be divisible by 3.

Next, if k=-2 then we'll have (x-1)x(x+2)=(x-1)x(x-1+3) --> which means that (x-1) and (x+2) will have the same remainder upon division by 3. Thus for k=-2 we won't be sure whether (x-1)x(x-k) is divisible by 3.

30 second approach: 4 out of 5 values of k from answer choices must guarantee divisibility of some expression by 3. Now, these 4 values of k in answer choices must have some pattern: if we get rid of -2 then -4, -1, 2, and 5 creating arithmetic progression with common difference of 3, so -2 is clearly doesn't belong to this pattern.

Hope it helps.

Bunuel,

Would this approach work for all integer divisors (NOT the 30 sec approach)?
Say the divisor is 4 and the choices had four terms instead of three, e.g. (x-1)(x-2)(x+k)(x+1)?

Thanks,
Intern
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 14
GMAT Date: 10-20-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2012, 02:37
I too solved it using a value for x =2, but I am not sure if is it better to solve using value for such questions or otherwise.
Intern
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 14
GMAT Date: 10-20-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2012, 00:10
Thanks EvaJager, I was always thought it is not good way to solve and I should learn the better way.
Thanks a lot...
Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 612
WE: Science (Education)
Followers: 97

Kudos [?]: 865 [0], given: 43

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2012, 01:10
Avantika5 wrote:
Thanks EvaJager, I was always thought it is not good way to solve and I should learn the better way.
Thanks a lot...

Better is a relative word...Mathematicians always try to prove and justify everything in a formal, logical way.
But GMAT is not testing mathematical abilities per se. If they wanted so, the questions would have been open and not multiple choice.
Have a flexible mind, think out of the box. GMAT is not a contest for the most beautiful, elegant, mathematical solution...
Get the correct answer as quickly as possible, and go to the next question without any feeling of guilt...:O)

Though, as I said, try to understand the other properties of the integer numbers, they can become handy and also, because they are so beautiful! Isn't Mathematics wonderful?
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Last edited by EvaJager on 06 Oct 2012, 01:46, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Status: Fighting hard
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Posts: 72
GMAT Date: 10-01-2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 84

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2012, 01:25
1. k=-4, x+4=y so x=y-4. Now ----- (y-4)(y-5)(y). Gives number divisible by 3 in all cases.
2. k=-2, , x+2=y so x=y-2. Now ----- (y-2)(y-3)(y). Not applicable when y is 5 or when x is 7
3. k=-1, , x+1=y so x=y-1. Now ----- (y-1)(y-2)(y). Consecutive 3 integers. Divisible by 3
4. k=2, , x-2=y so x=y+2. Now ----- (y+2)(y+1)(y). Consecutive 3 integers. Divisible by 3
5. k=5, , x-5=y so x=y+5. Now ----- (y+5)(y+4)(y). Consecutive 3 integers. Divisible by 3
_________________

I will rather do nothing than be busy doing nothing - Zen saying

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 365
Location: United States
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 45

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2013, 11:34
mikemcgarry wrote:
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this.

The rule that the product of three consecutive integers is a good start, but not the be all and end all.

number = x(x – 1)(x – k)

So far, we have integer x and one less that it (x - 1), so we could go down one more, or up one from x --

k = 2 ----> x(x – 1)(x – 2)

k = -1 ----> x(x – 1)(x + 1)

Now, we don't know which of the three factors are divisible by 3 -- x, or (x - 1), or the (x - k). If it's either of the first two, then we're golden, and k doesn't matter. But pretend that neither x nor (x - 1) is divisible by 3, then we are dependent on that last factor. Well, if (x - 2) is a multiple of three, we should be able to add or subtract three and still get a multiple of three.

(x - 2) - 3 = (x - 5)

(x - 5) - 3 = (x - 8)

(x - 2) + 3 = (x + 1), which we have already

(x + 1) + 3 = (x + 4)

(x + 3) + 3 = (x + 7)

So, for divisibility purposes, (x - 8), (x - 5), (x - 2), (x + 1), (x + 4), (x + 7) are all equivalent -- if any one of them is a multiple of three, all the others are. (You can check that the difference between any two is a multiple of 3.) BTW, if they are not divisible by three, then they all would have equal remainders if divided by three.

Back to the question:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT
A)-4
B)-2
C)-1
D) 2
E) 5

All of those choices give us a term on our list except for (B) -2.

BTW, notice all the answer choices are spaced apart by three except for (B).

Does that make sense? Please do not hesitate to ask if you have any questions.

Mike

Great posts everyone, including you Mike, who I am now quoting, but I would like to add that..

The first two integers for each answer choice cannot be divisible by 3 because all the answers choices would then be correct, thereby making the question invalid. Therefore, the last integer (x+k) must be divisible by 3, which helps in the theoretical approach...

It appears that was left out
Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2035
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 581 [0], given: 355

Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2013, 14:25
enigma123 wrote:
If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A. -4
B. -2
C. -1
D. 2
E. 5

The OA is B. I am trying to use the concept of consecutive numbers but got stuck. Can someone please help?

Question says x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divisible by three which means x(x-1) (x-k) should be consecutive.

Hi enigma123. Thank you for the nice question. But you might wanna put a spoiler on this statement The OA is B so that others can solve the question in real conditions. Thanks
Re: If x is an integer then x(x-1)(x-k) must be evenly divisible   [#permalink] 17 Oct 2013, 14:25

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
If x/6 and x/15 are integers, then x must be divisible by - 3 28 Sep 2016, 01:46
3 If x and y are integers and xy = 660, x or y must be divisible by whic 3 19 Apr 2016, 02:04
45 If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k) must be evenly divi 27 15 Dec 2010, 06:19
25 If x is an integer, then x(x - 1)(x - k) must be evenly 12 22 May 2010, 04:15
2 If x is an integer, then x(x - 1)(x - k) must be evenly divisible by 12 24 Apr 2008, 07:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by