Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: DS: Manhattan GMAT Inequality [#permalink]
14 Feb 2008, 09:42

I say B.

I. x/|x| < x Let's say X<0, x= -2 => -2/2<-2 false x= -1/2 => -1<-1/2 true if x>0, x=2 => 1<2 true x= 1/2 => 1<1/2 false. So X>1 or -1<x<0. If x=2 => |x| >1, if x=-1/2 => 1/2>-1/2 => |x|<1 not suff

II. |x| > x if x=-2 => 2>-2 true, if x=2 => 2>2 false So X<0 for |x| > x. if x=-2 => |-2|=2>1 false for every x<0 suff.

Re: DS: Manhattan GMAT Inequality [#permalink]
14 Feb 2008, 10:02

moni77 wrote:

I say B.

I. x/|x| < x Let's say X<0, x= -2 => -2/2<-2 false x= -1/2 => -1<-1/2 true if x>0, x=2 => 1<2 true x= 1/2 => 1<1/2 false. So X>1 or -1<x<0. If x=2 => |x| >1, if x=-1/2 => 1/2>-1/2 => |x|<1 not suff

II. |x| > x if x=-2 => 2>-2 true, if x=2 => 2>2 false So X<0 for |x| > x. if x=-2 => |-2|=2>1 false for every x<0 suff.

i think u may be correct.

why cant we cross multiply given that |x| is a nonneg number that wont flip the inequality sign? _________________

You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try'. -Homer Simpson

Re: DS: Manhattan GMAT Inequality [#permalink]
14 Feb 2008, 10:15

bmwhype2 wrote:

moni77 wrote:

I say B.

I. x/|x| < x Let's say X<0, x= -2 => -2/2<-2 false x= -1/2 => -1<-1/2 true if x>0, x=2 => 1<2 true x= 1/2 => 1<1/2 false. So X>1 or -1<x<0. If x=2 => |x| >1, if x=-1/2 => 1/2>-1/2 => |x|<1 not suff

II. |x| > x if x=-2 => 2>-2 true, if x=2 => 2>2 false So X<0 for |x| > x. if x=-2 => |-2|=2>1 false for every x<0 suff.

i think u may be correct.

why cant we cross multiply given that |x| is a nonneg number that wont flip the inequality sign?

You can do that too. x< x |x|, so |x|>1 if x>0 and |x|<1 if x<0. Try -2.-1/2, 2 and 1/2 and see the results.

Re: DS: Manhattan GMAT Inequality [#permalink]
14 Feb 2008, 11:01

This one is tricky because it is easy to lose sight of the original question. The question is basically asking whether x is between -1 and 1.

(1) This tells us either that a) -1 < x, or b) 1 < x. Neither of these scenarios by themselves tell us that x is bounded between -1 and 1. It might fall between these, but it might not.

(2) This statement tells us the x can only be negative. Again, by itself not sufficient.

(1) U (2) Now we know that x is negative, so we are looking at scenario (1)a), that -1 < x. But since x must be negative the more precise range is (-1,0). Together they are sufficient.

I submitted my Cambridge MBA application in on time. But do have to say I took a laziez faire approach to the whole submission thing. Even went to the...

For my Cambridge essay I have to write down by short and long term career objectives as a part of the personal statement. Easy enough I said, done it...