Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

X(|x| -1 ) > 0
means x and |x| - 1 should have same sign.
if x > 0 then |x| - 1 > 0 =>|x| > 1 . Since x>0 , x > 1
if x <0 then |x| - 1 <0> -x -1 > 0 => x > -1

So x is at least not less than 1 if we have to satisfies above equations.
Suff

But could you please explain me the following:
"x > x/|x| : x e (-1,0)&(1,+∞). the expression is true for x e (-1,0) and false for x e (1,+∞). INSUFF. "

x > x/|x|: if x is -ve, then we have x > - x/x ..> x > -1, why (mathematically) do you take range (-1,0) and not (-1,+∞) excluding 0?

But could you please explain me the following: "x > x/|x| : x e (-1,0)&(1,+∞). the expression is true for x e (-1,0) and false for x e (1,+∞). INSUFF. "

x > x/|x|: if x is -ve, then we have x > - x/x ..> x > -1, why (mathematically) do you take range (-1,0) and not (-1,+∞) excluding 0?

You've answered your question
x is -ve and x > -1 give you (-1,0)
You've lost (-∞,0) condition.

Is |x| < 1?
If x > 0 then |x| = x and the question becomes is x < 1
If x < 0 then |x| = -x and the question becomes is x > -1
Combining the 2, the question becomes is -1 < x < 1?

Stat 1:
Since |x| is always +ve, we multiply each side by |x|
x|x| > x
x|x| - x > 0
x(|x| - 1) > 0
x > 0 or |x| - 1 > 0
x > 0 or |x| > 1
x > 0 or x > 1 & x < -1
Insuff.

Stat 2:
Tells us that x < 0. Insuff.

Together:
If x < 0 as per stat 2, then to be less than -1 as per stat 1. This means that x does not fall in the range of -1 < x < 1. The answer is a definite no. Suff.

Can someone confirm that above approach is correct? Thanks.

I was checking my phone all day. I wasn’t sure when I would receive the admission decision from Tepper. I received an acceptance from Goizueta in the early morning...

This an overview of my journey till now! I started bloging in August last year. I had a nice list before getting started for GMAT studies. I took my first GMAT prep...

How should business schools teach public policy? On Wednesday, 22nd April 2015, between 2 - 3pm BST , two experts will answer readers' questions on the importance of integrating politics...