Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

X(|x| -1 ) > 0
means x and |x| - 1 should have same sign.
if x > 0 then |x| - 1 > 0 =>|x| > 1 . Since x>0 , x > 1
if x <0 then |x| - 1 <0> -x -1 > 0 => x > -1

So x is at least not less than 1 if we have to satisfies above equations.
Suff

But could you please explain me the following:
"x > x/|x| : x e (-1,0)&(1,+∞). the expression is true for x e (-1,0) and false for x e (1,+∞). INSUFF. "

x > x/|x|: if x is -ve, then we have x > - x/x ..> x > -1, why (mathematically) do you take range (-1,0) and not (-1,+∞) excluding 0?

But could you please explain me the following: "x > x/|x| : x e (-1,0)&(1,+∞). the expression is true for x e (-1,0) and false for x e (1,+∞). INSUFF. "

x > x/|x|: if x is -ve, then we have x > - x/x ..> x > -1, why (mathematically) do you take range (-1,0) and not (-1,+∞) excluding 0?

You've answered your question
x is -ve and x > -1 give you (-1,0)
You've lost (-∞,0) condition.

Is |x| < 1?
If x > 0 then |x| = x and the question becomes is x < 1
If x < 0 then |x| = -x and the question becomes is x > -1
Combining the 2, the question becomes is -1 < x < 1?

Stat 1:
Since |x| is always +ve, we multiply each side by |x|
x|x| > x
x|x| - x > 0
x(|x| - 1) > 0
x > 0 or |x| - 1 > 0
x > 0 or |x| > 1
x > 0 or x > 1 & x < -1
Insuff.

Stat 2:
Tells us that x < 0. Insuff.

Together:
If x < 0 as per stat 2, then to be less than -1 as per stat 1. This means that x does not fall in the range of -1 < x < 1. The answer is a definite no. Suff.

Can someone confirm that above approach is correct? Thanks.

I’m considering a very difficult decision. Insanity maybe? I don’t know. I’m thinking about retaking the GMAT before Round 2 deadlines with a goal of scoring...

I attended a portfolio workshop hosted by Business Design club today. Competing against thousands of MBA students with the entire world, you need more than your resume and coverletter...

so actually alongside the MBA studies, I am studying for personal trainer exam in December as a side. I can basically only read when I’m in the subway...