Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 19:54
Customize  |  Hide

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 82
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1? [#permalink] New post 18 May 2007, 17:31
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
How would you solve?

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

1) x/|x| is less than x

2) |x| is greater than x
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 919
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Absolute Value - DS [#permalink] New post 18 May 2007, 19:48
above720 wrote:
How would you solve?

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

1) x/|x| is less than x
2) |x| is greater than x



ween from i, x/lxl < x refers to x as -ve and but grater than -1. so its sufficient to say that lxl is <1> x only implies that x is ve. nsf.

A.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 159
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Absolute Value - DS [#permalink] New post 18 May 2007, 20:47
Himalayan wrote:
above720 wrote:
How would you solve?

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

1) x/|x| is less than x
2) |x| is greater than x



ween from i, x/lxl < x refers to x as -ve and but grater than -1. so its sufficient to say that lxl is <1> x only implies that x is ve. nsf.

A.


(1) (A) is also insuff because if x/|x| <x

then -1 < x <0> 1


(2) |x| > x => x must be -ve => insuff

(1) & (2) => suff

Hence, (C)
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 1097
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 May 2007, 21:27
C

is |x| < 1?

(1)
If x is +ve => 1/x < 1 => 1 < x
If x is -ve => x/|x| < x => |x|/|x| > |x| => 1 > |x|

Since (a) and (b) don't give same result for x, this is insufficient

(2) |x| > x means x is -ve, thus < 1. Insufficient

Combined, if x is -ve and (1) is true, we know from (1) that |x| is greater than 1 for sure.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 919
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Absolute Value - DS [#permalink] New post 18 May 2007, 21:39
Himalayan wrote:
above720 wrote:
How would you solve?

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

1) x/|x| is less than x
2) |x| is greater than x



ween from i, x/lxl < x refers to x as -ve and but grater than -1. so its sufficient to say that lxl is <1> x only implies that x is ve. nsf.

A.
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

agree with C.
Re: Absolute Value - DS   [#permalink] 18 May 2007, 21:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1? (1) x/|x| hsk 1 09 Jun 2007, 20:21
New posts If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1? (1) x/|x| lanter1 2 23 Jul 2007, 11:00
New posts If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1? x > x/|x| |x| alimad 3 04 Nov 2007, 06:33
New posts If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1? (1) ( x / |x|) xALIx 1 07 Jan 2009, 23:10
Popular new posts 3 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1? xianster 12 06 May 2010, 04:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.