Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

question: x id non zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??? now to be < 1 x must be negative, so the question become " is x negative ???

1) for a square to be < 1 the must be for example \(\frac{- 1}{2}\) ----> x is negative . suff

2) for x to be minor of a certain number that is the reciprocal i.e. : \(-2 < - 1/2\) --------> x is negative. suff

is correct or I should rethink the entire part regarding inequalities ?? because this statement should not take you more that 50 seconds to solve. otherwise you get in trouble with this exam.

question: x id non zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??? now to be < 1 x must be negative, so the question become " is x negative ???

1) for a square to be < 1 the must be for example \(\frac{- 1}{2}\) ----> x is negative . suff

2) for x to be minor of a certain number that is the reciprocal i.e. : \(-2 < - 1/2\) --------> x is negative. suff

is correct or I should rethink the entire part regarding inequalities ?? because this statement should not take you more that 50 seconds to solve. otherwise you get in trouble with this exam.

Thanks

I would suggest you to keep 4 ranges in mind when dealing with squares, reciprocals etc.

You can do the question logically or by plugging in numbers.

Ques: If x is not equal to zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ?? Logically, | x | implies distance from 0 on the number line. So the question becomes "Is x a distance of less than 1 away from 0?" i.e. "Is -1 < x < 1?" given x is not 0.

Statement 1: \(x^2\) \(< 1\) Square of a number will be less than 1 only if the absolute value of the number is less than 1. This means \(| x | < 1\). The number needn't be negative. If it is positive, it should be less than 1. If it negative, it should be greater than -1. Or, do you remember how to solve inequalities using the wave? \(x^2 < 1\) is \(x^2 - 1 < 0\) which is \((x - 1)(x + 1) < 0\). This implies -1 < x < 1 but x is not 0. Or plug in numbers from the given 4 ranges. YOu will see that x must lie in -1 < x < 1. Sufficient.

Statement 2: \(| x | < \frac{1}{x}\) First of all, x cannot be negative since | x | is never negative. Since | x | is less than 1/x, 1/x must be positive. Also, x cannot be greater than 1 since then, | x | will be greater than 1/x. Or plug in numbers from the given 4 ranges. You will see that x must lie in 0 < x < 1. Sufficient.

Re: If x is not equal to zero, is | x | < 1 ?? [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Sep 2012, 06:34

2

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

carcass wrote:

If x is not equal to zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??

1) \(x^2\) \(< 1\)

2) \(| x |\) < \(\frac{1}{x}\)

I would like to know if I do in the right manner

question: x id non zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??? now to be < 1 x must be negative, so the question become " is x negative ???

1) for a square to be < 1 the must be for example \(\frac{- 1}{2}\) ----> x is negative . suff

2) for x to be minor of a certain number that is the reciprocal i.e. : \(-2 < - 1/2\) --------> x is negative. suff

is correct or I should rethink the entire part regarding inequalities ?? because this statement should not take you more that 50 seconds to solve. otherwise you get in trouble with this exam.

Thanks

The condition \(x\) non-zero was given just because statement (2) has \(x\) in the denominator.

x id non zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??? Not necessarily. \(x\) can be greater than \(1\) or less than \(-1\), in which case, definitely \(|x|\) is not less than \(1.\)

now to be < 1 x must be negative, so the question become " is x negative ??? NO \(x\) can be between \(0\) and \(1\).

(1) \(x^2\) \(< 1\), take square root from both sides and obtain \(|x|<1\), because \(\sqrt{x^2}=|x|\). Sufficient.

(2) Since \(|x|<\frac{1}{x}\), it follows that \(x>0\), because \(|x|>0\). \(x\) cannot be negative!!! Then, the given inequality becomes \(x<\frac{1}{x}\), or \(x^2<1\) (we can multiply both sides by \(x\), which is positive) and we are again in the situation from (1) above. Sufficient.

Answer D.
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

(2) |x| < 1/x. Since the left hand side of the inequity (|x|) is an absolute value, which cannot be negative (actually in this case we know that its positive as we are given that \(x\neq{0}\)) then the right hand side (1/x) must also be positive, which means that \(x>0\), so \(|x|=x\).

Hence, \(|x| < \frac{1}{x}\) becomes \(x<\frac{1}{x}\). Since we know that \(x>0\) we can safely cross-multiply: \(x^2<1\). The same inequality as in (1). Sufficient.

Re: If x is not equal to zero, is | x | < 1 ?? [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Sep 2012, 07:58

Perfect Explanation, Evajager, @Carcass this is a very common mistake which I am also prone to make. Thanks @Evajager - Your explanation for {B}

Quote:

(2) Since , it follows that , because . cannot be negative!!! Then, the given inequality becomes , or (we can multiply both sides by , which is positive) and we are again in the situation from (1) above. Sufficient.

I remember skipping a Question just like this in one of my exams because I gt stuck!!! in solving - | x | < 1/x

Thanks guys you rock!!!
_________________

Giving Kudos, is a great Way to Help the GC Community Kudos

Re: If x is not equal to zero, is | x | < 1 ?? [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Sep 2012, 13:29

EvaJager wrote:

carcass wrote:

If x is not equal to zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??

1) \(x^2\) \(< 1\)

2) \(| x |\) < \(\frac{1}{x}\)

I would like to know if I do in the right manner

question: x id non zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??? now to be < 1 x must be negative, so the question become " is x negative ???

1) for a square to be < 1 the must be for example \(\frac{- 1}{2}\) ----> x is negative . suff

2) for x to be minor of a certain number that is the reciprocal i.e. : \(-2 < - 1/2\) --------> x is negative. suff

is correct or I should rethink the entire part regarding inequalities ?? because this statement should not take you more that 50 seconds to solve. otherwise you get in trouble with this exam.

Thanks

The condition \(x\) non-zero was given just because statement (2) has \(x\) in the denominator.

x id non zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??? Not necessarily. \(x\) can be greater than \(1\) or less than \(-1\), in which case, definitely \(|x|\) is not less than \(1.\)

now to be < 1 x must be negative, so the question become " is x negative ??? NO \(x\) can be between \(0\) and \(1\).

(1) \(x^2\) \(< 1\), take square root from both sides and obtain \(|x|<1\), because \(\sqrt{x^2}=|x|\). Sufficient.

(2) Since \(|x|<\frac{1}{x}\), it follows that \(x>0\), because \(|x|>0\). \(x\) cannot be negative!!! Then, the given inequality becomes \(x<\frac{1}{x}\), or \(x^2<1\) (we can multiply both sides by \(x\), which is positive) and we are again in the situation from (1) above. Sufficient.

Answer D.

Correction: in (2) and we are again in the situation from (1) above. - not exactly, but similar as we have \(x^2<1\) but in addition \(x>0.\) In (1) \(x\) could also be negative. The conclusion is still correct, as now \(|x|=x<1.\)
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Re: If x is not equal to zero, is | x | < 1 ?? [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Oct 2012, 04:24

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

carcass wrote:

If x is not equal to zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??

1) \(x^2\) \(< 1\)

2) \(| x |\) < \(\frac{1}{x}\)

I would like to know if I do in the right manner

question: x id non zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ??? now to be < 1 x must be negative, so the question become " is x negative ???

1) for a square to be < 1 the must be for example \(\frac{- 1}{2}\) ----> x is negative . suff

2) for x to be minor of a certain number that is the reciprocal i.e. : \(-2 < - 1/2\) --------> x is negative. suff

is correct or I should rethink the entire part regarding inequalities ?? because this statement should not take you more that 50 seconds to solve. otherwise you get in trouble with this exam.

Thanks

I would suggest you to keep 4 ranges in mind when dealing with squares, reciprocals etc.

You can do the question logically or by plugging in numbers.

Ques: If x is not equal to zero, is \(| x | < 1\) ?? Logically, | x | implies distance from 0 on the number line. So the question becomes "Is x a distance of less than 1 away from 0?" i.e. "Is -1 < x < 1?" given x is not 0.

Statement 1: \(x^2\) \(< 1\) Square of a number will be less than 1 only if the absolute value of the number is less than 1. This means \(| x | < 1\). The number needn't be negative. If it is positive, it should be less than 1. If it negative, it should be greater than -1. Or, do you remember how to solve inequalities using the wave? \(x^2 < 1\) is \(x^2 - 1 < 0\) which is \((x - 1)(x + 1) < 0\). This implies -1 < x < 1 but x is not 0. Or plug in numbers from the given 4 ranges. YOu will see that x must lie in -1 < x < 1. Sufficient.

Statement 2: \(| x | < \frac{1}{x}\) First of all, x cannot be negative since | x | is never negative. Since | x | is less than 1/x, 1/x must be positive. Also, x cannot be greater than 1 since then, | x | will be greater than 1/x. Or plug in numbers from the given 4 ranges. You will see that x must lie in 0 < x < 1. Sufficient.

Answer (D)

This is the same reasoning that I followed in the first instance with some errors but the path was correct. Specifically the stimulus evaluation : \(| x | < 1\) ------ in this scenario the first one is \(x < 1\) AND \(-x < 1\) so \(x > -1\) ------> \(- 1 < x < 1\)

Re: If x is not equal to zero, is |x| < 1 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Jul 2014, 04:52

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: If x is not equal to zero, is |x| < 1 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Oct 2015, 05:56

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

After days of waiting, sharing the tension with other applicants in forums, coming up with different theories about invites patterns, and, overall, refreshing my inbox every five minutes to...

I was totally freaking out. Apparently, most of the HBS invites were already sent and I didn’t get one. However, there are still some to come out on...

In early 2012, when I was working as a biomedical researcher at the National Institutes of Health , I decided that I wanted to get an MBA and make the...