Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

(A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) I and II only (E) I and III only

what is the fastest way to solbe it ?

Given: |x|<x^2 --> reduce by |x| (side note: we can safely do this as absolute value is non-negative and in this case we know it's not zero too, as if x would be zero inequality wouldn't hold true, so |x|>0) --> 1<|x| --> x<-1 or x>1.

So we have that x<-1 or x>1.

I. x^2>1 --> always true; II. x>0 --> may or may not be true; III. x<-1 --> --> may or may not be true.

The X-Y plane of looking at it is the fastest way - I would guess.

Mod(x) looks like a V

x^2 is a parabola which just touches the x-axis (tangent) at the origin.

When x < -1; Mod(x) < x^2 When x = -1; Mod (x) = x^2 When -1<x<0; Mod(x) > x^2 When x = 0; Mod (x) = x^2 When 0<x<1; Mod(x) > x^2 When x = 1; Mod (x) = x^2 When x > 1; Mod(x) < x^2

Bunuel, Isn't this always true when |x|<x^2 ... Isn't the answer E.

Thanks.

|x|<x^2 is given as fact and then we asked to determine which of the following statements MUST be true.

|x|<x^2 means that either x<-1 or x>1, x can be ANY value from these two ranges, (I think in your own solution you've reached this conclusion: when x<-1 the graph of |x| is below (less than) the graph of x^2 and when x>1 again the graph of |x| is below the graph of x^2).

Now, III says x<-1 this statement is not always true as x can be for example 3 and in this case x<-1 doesn't hold true.

|x|< x^2, X^2 should always be > 1 Can eliminate II, because if x=1/2, |x|> x^2

Could you give an example Bunuel

Question is: "which of the following statements MUST be true", not COULD be true.

We are GIVEN that |x|<x^2, which means that either x<-1 OR x>1.

So GIVEN that: x<-1ORx>1.

Statement II. is x<-1 always true? NO. As x could be more than 1, eg. 2, 3, 5.7, ... and in this case x<-1 is not true. So statement II which says that x<-1 is not always true.

Bunuel, I understand your reasoning but I don't think you are right. IMO the answer is E. Should we follow your logic:

Quote:

Statement II. is x<-1 always true? NO. As x could be more than 1, eg. 2, 3, 5.7, ... and in this case x<-1 is not true. So statement II which says that x<-1 is not always true.

Then we can't even accept I, since x doesn't always have to be greater than 1 (it can be -10, -50 etc.).

The question is similar to (but I still think that it is different):

Bunuel, I understand your reasoning but I don't think you are right. IMO the answer is E. Should we follow your logic:

Quote:

Statement II. is x<-1 always true? NO. As x could be more than 1, eg. 2, 3, 5.7, ... and in this case x<-1 is not true. So statement II which says that x<-1 is not always true.

Then we can't even accept I, since x doesn't always have to be greater than 1 (it can be -10, -50 etc.).

The question is similar to (but I still think that it is different):

Hi, If i solve option 1. i get x^2-1>0 or (x+1)(x-1)>0 this implies : x>-1 or x>1.. however the question in the stem can be rephrased as x<-1 or X>1.. How is option 1 true then?am i missing something?

Bunuel wrote:

mehdiov wrote:

If |x|<x^2 , which of the following must be true?

I. x^2>1 II. x>0 III. x<-1

(A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) I and II only (E) I and III only

what is the fastest way to solbe it ?

Given: |x|<x^2 --> reduce by |x| (side note: we can safely do this as absolute value is non-negative and in this case we know it's not zero too, as if x would be zero inequality wouldn't hold true, so |x|>0) --> 1<|x| --> x<-1 or x>1.

So we have that x<-1 or x>1.

I. x^2>1 --> always true; II. x>0 --> may or may not be true; III. x<-1 --> --> may or may not be true.

Hi, If i solve option 1. i get x^2-1>0 or (x+1)(x-1)>0 this implies : x>-1 or x>1.. however the question in the stem can be rephrased as x<-1 or X>1.. How is option 1 true then?am i missing something?

(A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) I and II only (E) I and III only

what is the fastest way to solbe it ?

Given: |x|<x^2 --> reduce by |x| (side note: we can safely do this as absolute value is non-negative and in this case we know it's not zero too, as if x would be zero inequality wouldn't hold true, so |x|>0) --> 1<|x| --> x<-1 or x>1.

So we have that x<-1 or x>1.

I. x^2>1 --> always true; II. x>0 --> may or may not be true; III. x<-1 --> --> may or may not be true.

Answer: A (I only).

Bunuel |x|.|x|=x^2 so when we divide x^2 by |x| we get |x|

(A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) I and II only (E) I and III only

what is the fastest way to solbe it ?

Given: |x|<x^2 --> reduce by |x| (side note: we can safely do this as absolute value is non-negative and in this case we know it's not zero too, as if x would be zero inequality wouldn't hold true, so |x|>0) --> 1<|x| --> x<-1 or x>1.

So we have that x<-1 or x>1.

I. x^2>1 --> always true; II. x>0 --> may or may not be true; III. x<-1 --> --> may or may not be true.

Answer: A (I only).

Bunuel |x|.|x|=x^2 so when we divide x^2 by |x| we get |x|

so |x|.|x|= x^2 is this a formula

Yes, |x|*|x|=x^2. Consider x=-2 then |x|*|x|=2*2=4=(-2)^2. _________________

Re: If |x|<x^2 , which of the following must be true? [#permalink]
23 May 2012, 04:10

Hi Bunuel, I understood your logic that we can safely divide by |x|, however, I tried to solve it this way, just wanted to confirm is this is also right...

x2>|x| => if x is positive then x2-x>0 => x(x-1)>0 => x<0 and x>1................case 1

and if x is negative, then x2+x>0 => x(x+1)>0 =>x<-1 and x>0...case2

From case 1 and case2....x<-1 and x>1..[Same conclusion but lengthier method].. I want to especially confirm because I tried to apply modulus and inequalities theory.. so want to be sure.

Re: If |x|<x^2 , which of the following must be true? [#permalink]
23 May 2012, 05:09

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

pavanpuneet wrote:

Hi Bunuel, I understood your logic that we can safely divide by |x|, however, I tried to solve it this way, just wanted to confirm is this is also right...

x2>|x| => if x is positive then x2-x>0 => x(x-1)>0 => x<0 and x>1................case 1

and if x is negative, then x2+x>0 => x(x+1)>0 =>x<-1 and x>0...case2

From case 1 and case2....x<-1 and x>1..[Same conclusion but lengthier method].. I want to especially confirm because I tried to apply modulus and inequalities theory.. so want to be sure.

x^2>|x|

If x>0 then x2-x>0 --> x(x-1)>0 --> x<0 and x>1. Since we are considering x>0 range then x>1; If x<0 then x2-x>0 --> x(x+1)>0 --> x<-1 and x>0. Since we are considering x<0 range then x<-1;

Re: If |x|<x^2 , which of the following must be true? [#permalink]
23 May 2012, 11:09

picked A in 46 secs. for |X| to be less than x^2 just means that it is x is not a decimal. it can be less than -1 and greater than 1. you can only say this in totality with certainty. And square of nay no less than -1 and greater than 1 will be greater than 1. so A

Re: If |x|<x^2 , which of the following must be true? [#permalink]
23 May 2012, 11:54

Bunuel: I have solved the problem in the following manner: Absolute value of x is positive. So, we can divide both side by x. that leaves us, 1<x or x>1. or x^2>1 Though i have the OA, am i making any fundamental error?

gmatclubot

Re: If |x|<x^2 , which of the following must be true?
[#permalink]
23 May 2012, 11:54

Well, I’ve had a busy month! In February I traveled to interview and visit three MBA programs. Earlier in the month I also went to Florida on vacation. This...

One of the reasons why I even considered Tepper is the location. Last summer I stopped in Pittsburgh on the way home from a road trip. We were vacationing...

“Which French bank was fined $613bn for manipulating the Euribor rate?” asked quizmaster Andrew Hill in this year’s FT MBA Quiz. “Société Générale” responded the...