Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 03 May 2015, 17:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If x/y > 2, is 3x + 2y < 18 ? (1) x - y is less than

Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1269
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

If x/y > 2, is 3x + 2y < 18 ? (1) x - y is less than [#permalink]  24 Aug 2008, 23:40
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
If x/y > 2, is 3x + 2y < 18 ?

(1) x - y is less than 2.
(2) y - x is less than 2.
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 302
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Re: DS: Inequalities [#permalink]  25 Aug 2008, 00:03
Given x/y>2.....implies both x and y can be positive or both of them are negative
If both of them are negative, 3x+2Y<0.
If both of them are positive we have x>2y..............(1)

Statement1: x-y<2
so x<2+y......(2)
From (1) and (2)
2y<x<2+y
So 2y<2+y
Hence y<2.......(3)
From (2) and (3), x<4 --------(4)
So from (3) and (4), it is clear that 3x+2y<16.
Hence statement (1) alone is sufficient

Coming to statement 2, we can think along the same lines and easily find two contradicting examples.

Let x=100 and y=1
Clearly x/y >2, and y-x<2 and the value of 3x+2y=302 (>18)

Let x=3 and y=1
Clearly x/y>2 and y-x<2 and the value of 3x+2y=11(<18)
So statement(2) is not sufficient

Hence A.

Hi, Kevin........I am happy to come back again with your question
_________________

Last edited by cicerone on 26 Aug 2008, 23:36, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 290
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 4

Re: DS: Inequalities [#permalink]  25 Aug 2008, 05:15
cicerone wrote:
Given x>2y..............(1) ( in the question)

You cannot cross multiply inequalities like that, y can be negative.

The answer should be A, but I tried with number picking, no idea how to solve otherwise.
_________________
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1828
Location: New York
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 541 [0], given: 5

Re: DS: Inequalities [#permalink]  25 Aug 2008, 06:44
Nerdboy wrote:
cicerone wrote:
Given x>2y..............(1) ( in the question)

You cannot cross multiply inequalities like that, y can be negative.

The answer should be A, but I tried with number picking, no idea how to solve otherwise.

Agree with you. Its possible that Y CAN BE NEGATIVE

x/y > 2 --> implies that x and y must have same singn -- both +Ve or both v-e

When positive.. "cicerone" solution lead to "A"
When both negative . 3x + 2y obviously <0
3x + 2y <18
Sufficient.. A
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 302
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

Re: DS: Inequalities [#permalink]  26 Aug 2008, 23:35
x2suresh wrote:
Nerdboy wrote:
cicerone wrote:
Given x>2y..............(1) ( in the question)

You cannot cross multiply inequalities like that, y can be negative.

The answer should be A, but I tried with number picking, no idea how to solve otherwise.

Agree with you. Its possible that Y CAN BE NEGATIVE

x/y > 2 --> implies that x and y must have same singn -- both +Ve or both v-e

When positive.. "cicerone" solution lead to "A"
When both negative . 3x + 2y obviously <0
3x + 2y <18
Sufficient.. A

Thank you friend.....My intention is to discuss the negative case.......but I forgot to mention that.....thanks once again....i will edit my post
_________________
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Posts: 58
Schools: Booth (Admit R1), Sloan (Ding R1), Tuck (R1)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [1] , given: 0

Re: DS: Inequalities [#permalink]  27 Dec 2008, 18:50
1
KUDOS
I tried solving this problem graphically and got A as well..

Solution: Following the steps below

1. Draw 3x + 2y = 18 (x intercept 6, y intercept 9)..The question asks if region BELOW 3x + 2y = 18 is satisfied by given data
2. Draw y = 1/2 x and shade the region BELOW the line. Find intersection with last line (intersects at (4.5, 2.25)).
3. Draw x - y = 2
4. condition A: x - y < 2 --> shade the region above x - y = 2 and find intersection with shaded region belonging to y = 1/2 x --> shaded intersection is BELOW 3x + 2y = 18 --> sufficient
5. condition B: x - y > 2 --> shade region below x - y = 2 and find intersection with shaded region belonging to y = 1/2 x --> shaded intersection is below as well as above 3x + 2y = 18 --> insufficient

Although this method appears complicated when written out, it actually is quite fast if you're comfortable with plotting lines / curves
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 879
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 7

Re: DS: Inequalities [#permalink]  29 Dec 2008, 04:24
xyz21 wrote:
I tried solving this problem graphically and got A as well..

Solution: Following the steps below

1. Draw 3x + 2y = 18 (x intercept 6, y intercept 9)..The question asks if region BELOW 3x + 2y = 18 is satisfied by given data
2. Draw y = 1/2 x and shade the region BELOW the line. Find intersection with last line (intersects at (4.5, 2.25)).
3. Draw x - y = 2
4. condition A: x - y < 2 --> shade the region above x - y = 2 and find intersection with shaded region belonging to y = 1/2 x --> shaded intersection is BELOW 3x + 2y = 18 --> sufficient
5. condition B: x - y > 2 --> shade region below x - y = 2 and find intersection with shaded region belonging to y = 1/2 x --> shaded intersection is below as well as above 3x + 2y = 18 --> insufficient

Although this method appears complicated when written out, it actually is quite fast if you're comfortable with plotting lines / curves

Solving graphically can be very easy - thanks for sharing your method xyz. Would you mind to post plotted graph that illustrates this?
Below I have tried to solve the problem algebraically.

Question stem:
x/y>2 => x>0, y>0; or x<0, y<0. When x<0, y<0 =>the answer to "3x+2y<18?" will be "Yes", so we are really looking at the case when x>0, y>0. Let me know if someone disagrees with my thinking here.

Let's denote "Greater Than" as "GT" and "Less Than" as "LT"
Given x>0; y>0, x/y>2 =>(x-2y)/y>0 => x>2y and y>0. We can depict x>2y as x=LT2y. ----- (1)
Substituting (1) for x in 3x+2y<18 => 3(LT2y)+2y<18 => LT6y+2y<18 => LT8y<18 => LTy<9/4.

Given the above, the question is really asking is 0<y<9/4 true?

Stmt1: x-y<2; or given (1), LT2y-y<2 => LTy<2. Given y>0, stmt 1 => 0<y<2 Suff

Stmt2: y-x<2; or x>y-2. Given (1), LT2y>y-2 => LTy>-2 Insuff

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 879
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 7

Re: DS: Inequalities [#permalink]  29 Dec 2008, 04:25
-deleted-
sorry for repeated posts.

Last edited by seofah on 29 Dec 2008, 04:39, edited 1 time in total.
Re: DS: Inequalities   [#permalink] 29 Dec 2008, 04:25
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 If (x/y) > 2, is 3x+2y<18 (1) x-y is less than 2 8 04 Mar 2009, 11:34
If (x/y)>2 , is 3x+2y<18? (1) x-y is less than 18 28 Jul 2008, 21:21
If x/y > 2, is 3x + 2y < 18 ? (1) x - y is less than 5 09 Mar 2008, 08:53
If x/y >2, is 3x+2y<18? 1. x-y is less than 2 2. y-x 1 22 Jan 2008, 21:54
1 If x/y > 2, is 3x + 2y < 18 ? (1) x-y is less than 2 2 20 Apr 2007, 06:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by