Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
since r is non zero (mentioned in Ques) hence, x and y, they cannot be both +ve or both -ve (as |x| = |y|)
so one has to +ve and other -ve, so that x-y still remains a non zero number, and since their mod values are same, x-y = 2x (assuming y = -x, there cant be any other valid assumption) and the denominator (2x + y) will be equal to x, so the value of the exp is 2x/x = 2.
stmt 2 alone is obviously not sufficient as there is no way to determine y.
(1) is not sufficient. x can be a negavtive of y, and vice versa. Similarly, both could be similar negative or postive values.
We can try by putting in some numbers, same x = 10, y = -10, then r=2
Or x = -10, y=10, then r = 2
Or x = 10, y=10, then r=0
And x = -10, y=-10, then r = 0
So we don't really know the value of r from this statement.
2) Not sufficient as well as we know nothing about y.
(1) and (2), x=-3, |x|=3=|y|
so y=+3, or -3
If y=+3, x=-3, r=-3-3/2(-3)+3, and r = 2
If y=-3, x=-3, r=-3+3/2(-3)-3 and r = 0
So again, we don't really know the value or r.
In the question it is specifically mentioned that r, x and y are non zero numbers, so r = 0 is not even of our concern. We need to know the value of r, while we know r is not 0, so r could be of an negative value or positive value. Using x and y as I mentioned all we get is an positive value.
hah ! alex, my bad. I did not spot the limits 'r x and y are non-zero'. No excuses, but i was working that at my workplace, so perhaps I missed it. Great work !
If x, y, and r are all nonzero numbers, what is the value of
r = (x-y) / (2x+y)
1) lxl = lyl
2) x = -3
By 1) alone, there are 4 possibilities:
+x, +y or +x, +x
+x, -y or +x, -x
-x, -y or -x, -x
-x, +y or -x, +x
+x, +y will give (x-x) / (2x+x) = 0
+x, -y will give (x-(-x)) / (2x-x) = 2x / x = 2
-x, -y will give (-x-(-x)) / (-2x-x) = 0 / -3x = 0
-x, +y will give (-x-x) / (-2x+x) = -2x / -x = 2
Now in the question, it says r cannot be 0, and from the above 4 possibilities, we can eliminate the first and 4th possibilities. This leads us to say r=2, and this allows us to answer the question - what is the value of r if it is a nonzero? We can test by substituting any number into the equation. Let's say x=5 and y=-5, we will get r=2. If we let x-8, y=-8, we will still get r=2. Same apply to x=-5, y=5 or x=-8, y=8. Why don't we consider x=5, y=5? Because in the question, it says r cannot be 0.
By 2) alone, we have no clue to answer the question.
So my answer is A. Pls post the correct answer....
OA is A guys. I thought this was a good catch question where the key lay in the opening sentence r is not equal to 0 so x = -y or y = -x according to A which is sufficient _________________