Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Is X + Y + Z divisible by 9? [#permalink]
17 Mar 2011, 17:37

1

This post received KUDOS

Well what you have to do is simplify the expression in (2) into 3(xyz) since the +3 and -3 cancel out.

Next step is you break this down into 300(x)+3(yz), so that you can relate this to (1).

If we take from (1) that (yz) is a multiple, then 3(yz) will be one too. For (2) to be true then, 300(x) has to be a multiple and so x will have to be either 3, 6, or 9.

Also (y+z) must equal 9 (18-> 1+8, 27-> 2+7, etc).

Since x can be either 3,6,or 9 obviously we dont know if the total will be 12,15, or 18, so we dont know if it is a multiple of 9.

Re: Is X + Y + Z divisible by 9? [#permalink]
17 Mar 2011, 18:32

Thanks a lot, bostonrb.

I see that all 2-digit multiples of 9 has 2 digits that add up to 9. 0,9, 1,8, 27, etc. Thanks for helping me with this question. +1

bostonrb wrote:

Well what you have to do is simplify the expression in (2) into 3(xyz) since the +3 and -3 cancel out.

Next step is you break this down into 300(x)+3(yz), so that you can relate this to (1).

If we take from (1) that (yz) is a multiple, then 3(yz) will be one too. For (2) to be true then, 300(x) has to be a multiple and so x will have to be either 3, 6, or 9.

Also (y+z) must equal 9 (18-> 1+8, 27-> 2+7, etc).

Since x can be either 3,6,or 9 obviously we dont know if the total will be 12,15, or 18, so we dont know if it is a multiple of 9.

Re: If x, y, and z are integers is (x+y+z) a multiple of 9? [#permalink]
30 Sep 2013, 10:47

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

josemarioamaya wrote:

If x, y, and z are digits is (x+y+z) a multiple of 9?

1) the two digit number yz is a multiple of 9 2) If xyz is a three digit number, 3(xyz-1)+3 is a multiple of 9

I'm happy to help with this.

First of all, if the sum of the digits of a number equals a multiple of 9, then the number itself is a multiple of 9. For example, 657 has a sum of digits 6 + 5 + 7 = 18, which is a multiple of 9, so this automatically means 657 is a multiple of 9. See http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-divis ... shortcuts/

Statement #1: the two digit number yz is a multiple of 9 This gives us zero information about x, so we cannot determine an answer. The three digit number xyz could be 645 or 945 --- the latter is divisible by 9, but the former isn't. This statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient.

Statement #2: If xyz is a three digit number, 3(xyz-1)+3 is a multiple of 9 First of all, 3(xyz-1)+3 = 3*xyz - 3 + 3 = 3*xyz. If 3*xyz is a multiple of 9, then all this means is that xyz must be a multiple of 3. Thus, either 645 or 945 would work. This statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient.

Combined statements: Notice that the two numbers 645 and 945 each satisfy both statements, but the former is not a multiple of 9, and the latter is. Thus, even with both statements, we can still come up with different numbers that yield different answer to the prompt question. Thus, even together, the combined statements are insufficient.

Re: If x, y, and z are digits is (x + y + z) a multiple of 9? [#permalink]
05 Jan 2014, 13:01

Yalephd wrote:

If x, y, and z are digits is (x + y + z) a multiple of 9?

(1) The two-digit number yz is a multiple of 9 (2) If xyz is a three-digit number, 3(xyz - 1) + 3 is a multiple of 9

Here's what I did. Now we have that x,y,z are digits and we need to know if x+y+z is a multiple of 9.

First statement yz is a multiple of 9. Therefore the sum of y+z is in fact a multiple of 9, but we know nothing about 'x' so this is clearly insufficient.

Second statement, we have that 3(xyz-1) +3 is a multiple of 9. Now, 3's cancel out and we are left with 3xyz is a multiple of 9 which is the same as xyz is a multiple of 3, or that x+y+z is a multiple of 3. Now, x+y+z could be a mulitple of 9 too or not. Insufficient.

Finally, with both statements together so we have that y+z is a multiple of 9, let's assume for instance that y+z = 1+8= yz=18. Now, we also know that xyz is a multiple of 3, if we say that x=3 then 318 divisible by 3 but not divisible by 9 hence insufficient. If we say that x=6, same here 618 divisible by 3 but not divisible by 9. However, if we try 918, we have that xyz divisible by 3 and 9, hence we also have a YES answer.

Therefore, answer is E

Hope this helps Cheers! J

gmatclubot

Re: If x, y, and z are digits is (x + y + z) a multiple of 9?
[#permalink]
05 Jan 2014, 13:01

Today, 1st year Rotman students had a great simulation event hosted by Scotiabank, one of Canada’s best and largest banks. Attended by entire Rotman 1st year students, the...

Nope. I never learned finance ever in my life until I came to Rotman. This is why I got really frustrated when this term started because I was certain...