New questions posted on the CR forum and SC forum. Answer + Explanation = Kudos

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

X> Z-Y AND X > Y-Z
OR X< Z-Y AND X < Y-Z ( This can't happen because either Z-Y or Y-Z must be smaller than 0 ---> X <0 ---> against the assumption in the problem)
---> The only case is X> Z-Y ---> suff

X> Z-Y AND X > Y-Z OR X< Z-Y AND X < Y-Z ( This can't happen because either Z-Y or Y-Z must be smaller than 0 ---> X <0 ---> against the assumption in the problem) ---> The only case is X> Z-Y ---> suff

OR X< Z-Y AND X < Y-Z ( This can't happen because either Z-Y or Y-Z must be smaller than 0 ---> X <0 ---> against the assumption in the problem) ---> The only case is X> Z-Y ---> suff

Go for D.

Well, i had some flaw in the red part.

Correct it :
Z^2 = X^2+ Y^2 --> X^2= Z^2 - Y^2 --> X^2= (Z-Y) * (Z+Y)
---> X= [(Z-Y) * (Z+Y)]/ X = (Z-Y) * ( ( Z+Y) / X) +If Z-Y < 0 ---> Z-Y < 0 < X --> Z-Y< X
+If Z-Y > 0
If the bold part < 1 ( that is Z+Y< X) --> X< Z-Y ---> Z+Y < X< Z-Y --> Z+Y < Z-Y ---> unreasonable --> this case can't happen
If the bold part >1 ( that is Z+Y > X) ---> X > Z-Y
--> finally, we still conclude that X> Z-Y

I'm still stuck to D.

Last edited by laxieqv on 05 Apr 2006, 03:49, edited 1 time in total.

OR X< Z-Y AND X < Y-Z ( This can't happen because either Z-Y or Y-Z must be smaller than 0 ---> X <0 ---> against the assumption in the problem) ---> The only case is X> Z-Y ---> suff

Go for D.

Well, i had some flaw in the red part.

Correct it : Z^2 = X^2+ Y^2 --> X^2= Z^2 - Y^2 --> X^2= (Z-Y) * (Z+Y) ---> X= [(Z-Y) * (Z+Y)]/ X = (Z-Y) * ( ( Z+Y) / X) +If Z-Y < 0 ---> Z-Y < 0 < X --> Z-Y< X +If Z-Y > 0 If the bold part < 1 ( that is Z+Y< X) --> X< Z-Y ---> Z+Y < X< Z-Y --> Z+Y < Z-Y ---> unreasonable --> this case can't happen If the bold part >1 ( that is Z+Y > X) ---> X > Z-Y --> finally, we still conclude that X> Z-Y

I'm still stuck to D.

Honestly, I didn't get your "bold part" approach. One thing for sure is that you shouldn't take gmat questions that serious. Remember that you have less than 2 minutes for each question.

Z^2 = X^2+ Y^2 --> X^2= Z^2 - Y^2 --> X^2= (Z-Y) * (Z+Y)
Because we want to know the relation btw X and ( Z-Y) , I divide both sides by X

---> X= [(Z-Y) * (Z+Y)]/ X = (Z-Y) * ( ( Z+Y) / X) At this point, we have to consider whether (Z-Y) is (-) or (+) as we examine the value of the both part +If Z-Y < 0 ---> Z-Y < 0 < X --> Z-Y< X
+If Z-Y > 0:
If the bold part < 1 ( that is Z+Y< X) --> X< Z-Y ---> Z+Y < X< Z-Y --> Z+Y < Z-Y ---> unreasonable --> this case can't happen
If the bold part >1 ( that is Z+Y > X) ---> X > Z-Y
--> finally, we still conclude that X> Z-Y

I'm still stuck to D.

It looks lengthy but as soon as you jot down your reasoning, it's quick!
If not, plugging number may be the least time-consuming but you never know if you take ALL cases into consideration.

A..
X > Z+Y.. is sufficient to know X > Z-Y.. try out any values..
X^2 = Z^2-Y^2.. Depends on whether Z > Y or Y > Z.
i.e X = Z -Y
or X = Y-Z.
Now we dont know which one is true because we dont know which one is greater to make sure X > 0.

It looks lengthy but as soon as you jot down your reasoning, it's quick! If not, plugging number may be the least time-consuming but you never know if you take ALL cases into consideration.

I agree with Laxie, although I had a hard time following the reasoning
Here is my explanation for D.

1. SUFF as explained above
2. Z^2 = X^2+Y^2,
From Pythagoras theorem, we can conclude that X, Y & Z are sides of a right angled triangle. And in any traingle, the third side is always greater than difference of sides and sum of the other 2 sides.
Hence Z-Y < X < Y+Z or Y-Z < X < Y+Z

In either case X > Y-Z..., Hence SUFF! _________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

A.. X > Z+Y.. is sufficient to know X > Z-Y.. try out any values.. X^2 = Z^2-Y^2.. Depends on whether Z > Y or Y > Z. i.e X = Z -Y or X = Y-Z. Now we dont know which one is true because we dont know which one is greater to make sure X > 0.

Hence A.

OA?

Doesnt matter which one is Greater! U know X=Z-Y so X CANNOT be > Z-Y!

U have to either prove X>Z-Y or prove that X is not > Z - Y

OR X< Z-Y AND X < Y-Z ( This can't happen because either Z-Y or Y-Z must be smaller than 0 ---> X <0 ---> against the assumption in the problem) ---> The only case is X> Z-Y ---> suff

Go for D.

Well, i had some flaw in the red part.

Correct it : Z^2 = X^2+ Y^2 --> X^2= Z^2 - Y^2 --> X^2= (Z-Y) * (Z+Y) ---> X= [(Z-Y) * (Z+Y)]/ X = (Z-Y) * ( ( Z+Y) / X) +If Z-Y < 0 ---> Z-Y < 0 < X --> Z-Y< X +If Z-Y > 0 If the bold part < 1 ( that is Z+Y< X) --> X< Z-Y ---> Z+Y < X< Z-Y --> Z+Y < Z-Y ---> unreasonable --> this case can't happen If the bold part >1 ( that is Z+Y > X) ---> X > Z-Y --> finally, we still conclude that X> Z-Y

I'm still stuck to D.

Honestly, I didn't get your "bold part" approach. One thing for sure is that you shouldn't take gmat questions that serious. Remember that you have less than 2 minutes for each question.

So can anybody explain, why st.2 is insufficient?

Here is my two cents

From st 2

X= [(Z-Y) * (Z+Y)]/ X

---> X = (Z-Y) * (Z+Y)/X --------(A)
Now the value of X dependeds on value of (Z+Y)/X.
Here (Z+Y)/X can be greater than 1 or less than depends on the values of X, Y, Z.

if Z+ Y > X then A will be greater than Xand if Z+ Y < X then A will be less than X.

---> X = (Z-Y) * (Z+Y)/X --------(A) Now the value of X dependeds on value of (Z+Y)/X. Here (Z+Y)/X can be greater than 1 or less than depends on the values of X, Y, Z.

if Z+ Y > X then A will be greater than Xand if Z+ Y < X then A will be less than X.

So from St 2 we can't say any thing.

So answer is A

buddy,
If Z+Y < X --> (Z+Y)/ X <1 ---> X= (Z-Y) * sth smaller than 1 --->
X< Z-Y. At this point, it's tempting to conclude but when we look back:
we have Z+Y< X then X< Z-Y --> Z+Y< Z-Y ---> Y< 0 ---> unreasonable.
Thus, this case can't be correct.
The only case is Z+Y >X --> X> Z-Y

It looks lengthy but as soon as you jot down your reasoning, it's quick! If not, plugging number may be the least time-consuming but you never know if you take ALL cases into consideration.

I agree with Laxie, although I had a hard time following the reasoning Here is my explanation for D.

1. SUFF as explained above 2. Z^2 = X^2+Y^2, From Pythagoras theorem, we can conclude that X, Y & Z are sides of a right angled triangle. And in any traingle, the third side is always greater than difference of sides and sum of the other 2 sides. Hence Z-Y < X < Y+Z or Y-Z < X < Y+Z In either case X > Y-Z..., Hence SUFF!

REALLY COOL!!!!! ^_^
OMG, I'm a CEO now, yippiiieeeeee~!!!

---> X = (Z-Y) * (Z+Y)/X --------(A) Now the value of X dependeds on value of (Z+Y)/X. Here (Z+Y)/X can be greater than 1 or less than depends on the values of X, Y, Z.

if Z+ Y > X then A will be greater than Xand if Z+ Y < X then A will be less than X.

So from St 2 we can't say any thing.

So answer is A

buddy, If Z+Y < X --> (Z+Y)/ X <1 ---> X= (Z-Y) * sth smaller than 1 ---> X< Z-Y. At this point, it's tempting to conclude but when we look back: we have Z+Y< X then X< Z-Y --> Z+Y< Z-Y ---> Y< 0 ---> unreasonable. Thus, this case can't be correct. The only case is Z+Y >X --> X> Z-Y

Why you think that number picking will take more time?

You just need to know the number tendency:
pick 5, 4 and 3
x will be greater than z-y by 2 or 1
pick 10, 8 and 6
x will be greater than z-y by 2 or 4
Thus the greater number you give for x,y,z. the greater difference it will be between x and z-y, where x will always be greate than z-y

Why you think that number picking will take more time?

I did say it's the least time-consuming (refer to my above post) ...just that it may not be generic, coz you may ignore some ilicit cases.

For GMAT questions, there's no point that we shouldn't take it seriously. Especially when the GMAT conducted by new test provider contains more difficult quantitive questions than the old one.

As questions posted here to discuss, I just want to try to explain quantitively how and why a certain outcome is. That is to say, we should try to fathom the precision as much as possible. That is my point of view.

If X, Y and Z are positive integers, is X greater than Z â€“ Y?

(1) X â€“ Z â€“ Y > 0.

(2) Z2 = X2 + Y2

as X,Y,Z are positive integers and X-Z-Y>0 => X>Z+Y
so, X is greatest in the set => X also has to be greater than Z-Y and so A will give the answer

in B, Z 2=X2+Y2 I was forced to think in terms of pythagoras theorem and so Z is greatest length.
and X might or might not be greater than Z-Y so I we cannot get answer from B

Sometime i realy get dejected looking at the way i arrive at the solution. My answer might be right but the way i think (sometime) is diffrent from the way this whole forum look at the problem.

PLEASE LOOK AT MY REPLY ABOVE. HERE I THOUGHT IN TERMS OF PYTHAGORAS THEOREM!!

I am worried some of my habits might cost me extra bits .... Any inputs will be helpful.

Why you think that number picking will take more time?

I did say it's the least time-consuming (refer to my above post) ...just that it may not be generic, coz you may ignore some ilicit cases.

For GMAT questions, there's no point that we shouldn't take it seriously. Especially when the GMAT conducted by new test provider contains more difficult quantitive questions than the old one.

As questions posted here to discuss, I just want to try to explain quantitively how and why a certain outcome is. That is to say, we should try to fathom the precision as much as possible. That is my point of view.

yes, I agree with you that it is useful to try to solve the question "the right" way here on forum. But not on real GMAT. On real test you should learn to analize and find the easiest and fastest way while not harming your score. That is why, I think we should at least try to think outside of the box. Hope, I wasn't harsh.

Quote:

in B, Z 2=X2+Y2 I was forced to think in terms of pythagoras theorem and so Z is greatest length. and X might or might not be greater than Z-Y so I we cannot get answer from B

Can you give me ANY example where Z-Y>X, using positive integers?

Wow...I'm still reeling from my HBS admit . Thank you once again to everyone who has helped me through this process. Every year, USNews releases their rankings of...

Almost half of MBA is finally coming to an end. I still have the intensive Capstone remaining which started this week, but things have been ok so far...