Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

1) Case 1: y/2=4, case 2: y/2=2, in two case x=1, z=6 In two case, we have different ans (not suf) 2) with x=3 and 2y = 10 and 4, we have different ans (not suf) Together we have, x<y/2<y<2y<z => YES Hence C

Re: x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 15:30

vcbabu wrote:

x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

Hey all, was just checking this question out. Wanted to know what is the OA for this one. I got B. Let me walk you through the way I solved it So is y between x and z? Ok, let's do it!

Statement 1 y/2 is actually between x and z, but we don't really know about y, only that it is positive but still this is not sufficient

Statement 2 Ok, now this says that 2y is between x and z, so algebraically x<2y<z, now if we divide all terms by 2 we get x/2<y<z/2 Now if they are all positive and y is between half of x and half of z, then y must definetely also be in the range x<y<z, If i'm not mistaken So IMO, Answer should be (B)

Please let me know if this works Kudos if you like! Cheers J

x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

Hey all, was just checking this question out. Wanted to know what is the OA for this one. I got B. Let me walk you through the way I solved it So is y between x and z? Ok, let's do it!

Statement 1 y/2 is actually between x and z, but we don't really know about y, only that it is positive but still this is not sufficient

Statement 2 Ok, now this says that 2y is between x and z, so algebraically x<2y<z, now if we divide all terms by 2 we get x/2<y<z/2 Now if they are all positive and y is between half of x and half of z, then y must definetely also be in the range x<y<z, If i'm not mistaken So IMO, Answer should be (B)

Please let me know if this works Kudos if you like! Cheers J

No B is not correct. Check below. Notice that it's basically the same exact question.

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y.

If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 1 --> answer NO. If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 2 --> answer YES.

Not sufficient.

(2) 2x < z < 2y.

If x = 1, y = 2, and z = 3 --> answer NO. If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 3 --> answer YES.

Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Add the inequalities: 3x < 3z < 3y --> divide by 3: x < z < y. Sufficient.

Re: If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y? [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Nov 2013, 14:52

9

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

vcbabu wrote:

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

question- is "x < z < y" or "y < z < x" ????

1) x < 2z < y since 2z<y ( and all are positive) we can infer that z<y . But we do not know weather x<z Insufficient (2) 2x < z < 2y since 2x<z , we can infer x<z , but we cant say if z<y Insufficient

Combine both 1 and 2 - x<z<y ... sufficient
_________________

Re: If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y? [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Nov 2013, 20:24

vcbabu wrote:

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

Question Basically asks whether x<z<y or y<z<x

from St 1 we have x<2z<y Consider x=4, y= 9, 2z= 7.8 --->z= 3.9 Is Z between x and y : No Consider x=4, y=9 and 2z= 8.4 ---->z =4.2. Is Z between x and y : yes

So A and D ruled out

Consider St 2, we have 2x<z<2y------> x<z/2< y

Consider x= 4, y=14, z/2= 6----> then z=12, Is Z between x and y : yes Consider x=4, y=14, z/2=8 ----> then z=16, Is Z between x and y: no

So B ruled out.

Combining we get x<2z<y and x<z/2<y. Now if if both z/2 and 2z are in between x and y then z will also between X and Y.

Ans C
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Re: If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y? [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Feb 2014, 07:00

Hi Bunnel,

I have made mistakes in these questions a couple of times... I solve them incorrectly under time pressure as I jumble up the number cases to pick.

Do you have a Drill or a 'set of questions' for specifically this type of questions that test inequalities in multiple variables? Do you have some theory tips / pointers? (For eg. - I finnd that consider very close values in Case 1 and considering extremely far values in Case 2 helps...)

Re: If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y? [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Apr 2014, 04:42

vcbabu wrote:

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

I want to know what is wrong with the following method:

1) x= 1, z = 3, y = 8 this satisfies statement 1 and answer is Yes x=2, z= 2 , y = 8 this also satisfies statement 1 and answer is No

Insufficient.

Statement 2 : Since all are positive I can reduce by 2 , we get x<(z/2)<y

x= 1, z= 4, y = 8 This satisfies statement 2and answer is yes

x= 1, z= 4, y = 4 this satisfies statement 2 also and the answer is no

1+2 Adding both of these

x < 2z < y x<z/2<y

we get 2x<2.5z<2y

x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No So how come I am getting E, if I reduce statement 2, by 2 and then add with statement 1

I thought we could reduce statement 2 by 2 since all are positive ?If any one could point out the flaw here I would be grateful.

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

I want to know what is wrong with the following method:

1) x= 1, z = 3, y = 8 this satisfies statement 1 and answer is Yes x=2, z= 2 , y = 8 this also satisfies statement 1 and answer is No

Insufficient.

Statement 2 : Since all are positive I can reduce by 2 , we get x<(z/2)<y

x= 1, z= 4, y = 8 This satisfies statement 2and answer is yes

x= 1, z= 4, y = 4 this satisfies statement 2 also and the answer is no

1+2 Adding both of these

x < 2z < y x<z/2<y

we get 2x<2.5z<2y

x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No So how come I am getting E, if I reduce statement 2, by 2 and then add with statement 1

I thought we could reduce statement 2 by 2 since all are positive ?If any one could point out the flaw here I would be grateful.

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

When you add the inequalities you get:

(x+2x) < (2z+z) < (y+2y) --> 3x < 3z < 3y --> x < y < z.

Re: If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y? [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Apr 2014, 12:05

Bunuel wrote:

qlx wrote:

vcbabu wrote:

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

I want to know what is wrong with the following method:

1) x= 1, z = 3, y = 8 this satisfies statement 1 and answer is Yes x=2, z= 2 , y = 8 this also satisfies statement 1 and answer is No

Insufficient.

Statement 2 : Since all are positive I can reduce by 2 , we get x<(z/2)<y

x= 1, z= 4, y = 8 This satisfies statement 2and answer is yes

x= 1, z= 4, y = 4 this satisfies statement 2 also and the answer is no

1+2 Adding both of these

x < 2z < y x<z/2<y

we get 2x<2.5z<2y

x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No So how come I am getting E, if I reduce statement 2, by 2 and then add with statement 1

I thought we could reduce statement 2 by 2 since all are positive ?If any one could point out the flaw here I would be grateful.

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

When you add the inequalities you get:

(x+2x) < (2z+z) < (y+2y) --> 3x < 3z < 3y --> x < y < z.

sorry I didn't get it. My question was since all are positive I can definitely reduce statement 2 by 2, right? now statement 2 becomes x<(z/2)<y why am I not getting the answer if I take statement 1 as x < 2z < y , and statement 2 as x<(z/2)<y

Adding 1 and 2 we get 2x<2.5z<2y

x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No

So how come this is not working out if after reducing stat.2 I add it to 1?

In the same way if we were to solve :

(Q2) x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

adding 1 and 2--> 2x<2.5z<2y so here the answer is E x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

I want to know what is wrong with the following method:

1) x= 1, z = 3, y = 8 this satisfies statement 1 and answer is Yes x=2, z= 2 , y = 8 this also satisfies statement 1 and answer is No

Insufficient.

Statement 2 : Since all are positive I can reduce by 2 , we get x<(z/2)<y

x= 1, z= 4, y = 8 This satisfies statement 2and answer is yes

x= 1, z= 4, y = 4 this satisfies statement 2 also and the answer is no

1+2 Adding both of these

x < 2z < y x<z/2<y

we get 2x<2.5z<2y

x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No So how come I am getting E, if I reduce statement 2, by 2 and then add with statement 1

I thought we could reduce statement 2 by 2 since all are positive ?If any one could point out the flaw here I would be grateful.

(1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

When you add the inequalities you get:

(x+2x) < (2z+z) < (y+2y) --> 3x < 3z < 3y --> x < y < z.

sorry I didn't get it. My question was since all are positive I can definitely reduce statement 2 by 2, right? now statement 2 becomes x<(z/2)<y why am I not getting the answer if I take statement 1 as x < 2z < y , and statement 2 as x<(z/2)<y

Adding 1 and 2 we get 2x<2.5z<2y

x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No

So how come this is not working out if after reducing stat.2 I add it to 1?

In the same way if we were to solve :

(Q2) x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

adding 1 and 2--> 2x<2.5z<2y so here the answer is E x= 1 z= 2 y = 3 this satisfies the combined statement and the answer is yes x= 2, z=2 and y =3 this satisfies the combined statement too and the answer is No

So what is the answer to Q2, C or E

Thank you for your help.

1. You can reduce 2x < z < 2y by 2 no matter whether x, y, and z are positive or negative. You can always reduce/multiply an inequality by a positive value (2 in our case).

2. Reducing by 2 and adding, though legit is not a correct way to solve. You can add the two inequalities without reducing and directly get (x+2x) < (2z+z) < (y+2y) --> 3x < 3z < 3y --> x < y < z.

3. When you reduce and then add you'll get 2x < 2.5z < 2y but you cannot plug arbitrary value of x, y, and z there. The values must satisfy all the inequalities, while x=1, z=2, y=3 and x=2, z=2, y=3 does NOT satisfy neither x < 2z < y nor 2x < z < 2y.

Re: If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y? [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2014, 05:11

Thank you , the fact that after addition of the 2 statements , the values we choose should satisfy all the inequalities , made it clear.

Now for the question below : (Q2) x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

Simply adding 1 and 2 gives 2x<2.5y<2z for this we have to plug and test , we have to choose values that satisfy all the 3 inequalities , This way we get the answer as C .

But if we were to multiply statement 1 by 2 and then add to statement 2 we would get 3x<3y<3z which is x<y<z , this way was much easier here.

so as we can see , in some cases it is easier to get the answer without any manipulation(reducing/ multiplication), as in first case (1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

and in some cases it is easier to get the answer after manipulation( reducing/ multiplication) as in this case : x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

Thank you , the fact that after addition of the 2 statements , the values we choose should satisfy all the inequalities , made it clear.

Now for the question below : (Q2) x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

Simply adding 1 and 2 gives 2x<2.5y<2z for this we have to plug and test , we have to choose values that satisfy all the 3 inequalities , This way we get the answer as C .

But if we were to multiply statement 1 by 2 and then add to statement 2 we would get 3x<3y<3z which is x<y<z , this way was much easier here.

so as we can see , in some cases it is easier to get the answer without any manipulation(reducing/ multiplication), as in first case (1) x < 2z < y (2) 2x < z < 2y

and in some cases it is easier to get the answer after manipulation( reducing/ multiplication) as in this case : x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

So are these deductions correct?

Yes, sometimes you need some kind of manipulations before adding/subtracting,
_________________

Re: If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y? [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Sep 2014, 07:17

Bunuel wrote:

jlgdr wrote:

vcbabu wrote:

x,y,z>0, is y between x and z? 1). x<(y/2)<z 2). x<2y<z

Hey all, was just checking this question out. Wanted to know what is the OA for this one. I got B. Let me walk you through the way I solved it So is y between x and z? Ok, let's do it!

Statement 1 y/2 is actually between x and z, but we don't really know about y, only that it is positive but still this is not sufficient

Statement 2 Ok, now this says that 2y is between x and z, so algebraically x<2y<z, now if we divide all terms by 2 we get x/2<y<z/2 Now if they are all positive and y is between half of x and half of z, then y must definetely also be in the range x<y<z, If i'm not mistaken So IMO, Answer should be (B)

Please let me know if this works Kudos if you like! Cheers J

No B is not correct. Check below. Notice that it's basically the same exact question.

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y.

If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 1 --> answer NO. If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 2 --> answer YES.

Not sufficient.

(2) 2x < z < 2y.

If x = 1, y = 2, and z = 3 --> answer NO. If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 3 --> answer YES.

Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Add the inequalities: 3x < 3z < 3y --> divide by 3: x < z < y. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel, It may be a dumb question but i am really not able to understand why Statement 1 is not sufficient

In a you have mentioned that If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 1 --> answer NO.

But if i put the values in inequality i get x < 2z < y= 1 < 2 < 10 which is absolutely fine. then why the answer is No

Hey all, was just checking this question out. Wanted to know what is the OA for this one. I got B. Let me walk you through the way I solved it So is y between x and z? Ok, let's do it!

Statement 1 y/2 is actually between x and z, but we don't really know about y, only that it is positive but still this is not sufficient

Statement 2 Ok, now this says that 2y is between x and z, so algebraically x<2y<z, now if we divide all terms by 2 we get x/2<y<z/2 Now if they are all positive and y is between half of x and half of z, then y must definetely also be in the range x<y<z, If i'm not mistaken So IMO, Answer should be (B)

Please let me know if this works Kudos if you like! Cheers J

No B is not correct. Check below. Notice that it's basically the same exact question.

If x, y and z are positive numbers, is z between x and y?

(1) x < 2z < y.

If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 1 --> answer NO. If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 2 --> answer YES.

Not sufficient.

(2) 2x < z < 2y.

If x = 1, y = 2, and z = 3 --> answer NO. If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 3 --> answer YES.

Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Add the inequalities: 3x < 3z < 3y --> divide by 3: x < z < y. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel, It may be a dumb question but i am really not able to understand why Statement 1 is not sufficient

In a you have mentioned that If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 1 --> answer NO.

But if i put the values in inequality i get x < 2z < y= 1 < 2 < 10 which is absolutely fine. then why the answer is No

It seems that you don't understand how DS questions work.

The question asks whether z is between x and y.

(1) says that x < 2z < y.

If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 1 (x < 2z < y), then z is NOT between x and y --> answer NO. If x = 1, y = 10, and z = 2 (x < 2z < y), then z IS between x and y --> answer YES.

We have two different answers to the question, which means that the statement is NOT sufficient.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...