Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Is \(zx > yx\)? --> is \(zx-yx>0\)? --> is \(x(z-y) >0\)?

(1) z > 0. Clearly insufficient.

(2) y < 0. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Now, remember that we can subtract inequalities with the signs in opposite direction --> subtract (2) from (1): \(z-y>0\). So, we know that the second multiply in \(x(z-y)\) is positive, but we still don't know the sign of \(x\): from the stem (\(x>y\)) and the second statement (\(y<0\)) the only thing we can deduce is that \(x\) is greater than negative number \(y\), hence \(x\) could be negative, positive or zero. Not sufficient.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Does anyone have advice on how to tackle these problems faster? I always end up resorting to plugging in numbers and various conditions and even though that helps me ensure more accuracy, it usually takes me about 3 min. per such problem (inequalities with only variables).

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

St.1 z>0. INSUFF (we do not know whether x,y>0) St.2 y<0. INSUFF (we do not need other variables because if one is negative we cannot answer definitely) St.1+St.2. Still y<0, so INSUFF

just to make sure i understood it: zx > yx --> we cannot simplify to z > y because we don't know if x is positive or negative, right?

Yes exactly. In inequalities be very careful with cancelling variables without knowing for sure what signs are they.

In the current question, zx>xy --> x(z-y)>0

After combining the 2 statements, you do know that -y>0 and z>0 ---> z-y>0 but without knowing the sign of 'x', you will not be able to answer yes or no for the question asked.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...