Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Each week we'll be posting several questions from The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition and then after couple of days we'll provide Official Answer (OA) to them along with a slution.

We'll be glad if you participate in development of this project: 1. Please provide your solutions to the questions; 2. Please vote for the best solutions by pressing Kudos button; 3. Please vote for the questions themselves by pressing Kudos button; 4. Please share your views on difficulty level of the questions, so that we have most precise evaluation.

(1) y > 3. If x were \(\geq{1}\), then xy would be more than or equal to 3, which would contradcit the condition that xy < 3. Thus x must be less than 1. Sufficient.

(2) x < 3. Not sufficient: consider x=y=0 and x=2 and y=0. Not sufficient.

From S1:y>3=>x=fraction/negative integer=>x<1.Sufficient From S2:x<3=>x=2,1,0...depending on y.It cannot be said whether x<1 or >1.Hence insufficient. Ans.A

(1) y > 3. If x were \(\geq{1}\), then xy would be more than or equal to 3, which would contradcit the condition that xy < 3. Thus x must be less than 1. Sufficient.

(2) x < 3. Not sufficient: consider x=y=0 and x=2 and y=0. Not sufficient.

(1) y > 3. If x were \(\geq{1}\), then xy would be more than or equal to 3, which would contradict the condition that xy < 3. Thus x must be less than 1. Sufficient.

(2) x < 3. Not sufficient: consider x=y=0 and x=2 and y=0. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

I'm a bit confused after analyzing another similar question with different solution

In st1, why negative values of x are not being considered ? I came up with answer "E", considering negative values of x

However, just when I was convinced that, values of x and y need to be assumed positive in this type of prompt, I met the following question

Is xy < 6?

(1) x < 3 and y < 2. (2) 1/2 < x < 2/3 and y^2 < 64.

Data Sufficiency, Question: 68, Page: 157, OG quant review 2nd edition

SOLUTION

Is xy < 6?

(1) x < 3 and y < 2 --> now, if both x and y are equal to zero then xy=0<6 and the answer will be YES but if both x and y are small enough negative numbers, for example -10 and -10 then xy=100>6 and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

(2) \frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{2}{3} and y^2<64, which is equivalent to -8<y<8 --> even if we take the boundary values of x and y to maximize their product we'll get: xy=\frac{2}{3}*8\approx{5.3}<6, so the answer to the question "is xy<6?" will always be YES. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Here, both the positive and negative values of x and y have been considered.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...