Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

statement 1: y+319=even. Thus y has to be odd. 3 * odd number = odd number.

statement 2: y cannot be divided by any odd number other than 1. y could be even, or prime. eg., 2 or 5. insufficient.

Question 2: C)

statement 1: this gives us two equations, x=4y+3 and x=5z+3 or 4y=5z. which is insufficient to calculate x or figure out whether x>17. Here x could be 3, and y and z would be zero.

statement 2: x is a multiple of 21. x could be 0, so this is insufficient.

together, we know x is greater than zero, and by statement 2, we know x is a multiple of 21. thus we can be assured that x>17, for example x could be 63. Thus sufficient together.

Be careful with the first one chet. Statement 2 says that y cannot evenly be divided by any other odd number except 1. Prime numbers like 5, 7, 11 etc, can also be divided by themselves. Therefore, statement 2 must be an even number. Either answer choice is sufficient. D

Also, in question 2, the information in the second statement is unnecessary. A

I agreed with Chet on both questions.
But the answers given were D for both the questions
I dont understand why they dont consider the number 1 in the first question and a multiple of 0 in the second question. _________________

Answer to the first one is D, as GMATT73 explaned.

Answer to the second one is also D

1 tells you that when divided by 4 or 5, x leaves a remainder of 3. So x is the common multiple of 4 and 5 increased by 3. The least common multiple of 4 and 5 is 20, so x is at least 23. Sufficient

2 the question tells you that x is POSITIVE, so x cannot be 0. Thus 2 is sufficient.

If y is a positive integer, is 3y odd? 1) y+319 is even 2) y cannot be evenly divided by any odd number other than 1

from i, it is clear that y is odd. from ii, y is 1, not any other values.

so both are sufficient......

asaratchandra wrote:

If the integer x is positive, is x>17? 1) When x is divided by 4 or 5, the remainder is 3 2) x is evenly divisible by 21

from i, x is > than 17 because the minimum value that satisfies to have 3 as reminder when divided by eithr 4 or 5 is 23.
from ii, x is > 17 because the lowest value that is evenly divided by 21 is 21.

I agree with asaratchandra
Actually for the first question, I dont see how D is ok
I agree that statement 1 is suff.
However, concerning statement 2, Y can also be 2 or 4. No ???

HIMALAYA wrote:

good questions.

asaratchandra wrote:

If y is a positive integer, is 3y odd? 1) y+319 is even 2) y cannot be evenly divided by any odd number other than 1

from i, it is clear that y is odd. from ii, y is 1, not any other values.

so both are sufficient......

asaratchandra wrote:

If the integer x is positive, is x>17? 1) When x is divided by 4 or 5, the remainder is 3 2) x is evenly divisible by 21

from i, x is > than 17 because the minimum value that satisfies to have 3 as reminder when divided by eithr 4 or 5 is 23. from ii, x is > 17 because the lowest value that is evenly divided by 21 is 21.

Question 1:
(1) y must be odd. Enough to anwer the question
(2) y can be 1 or 2^n where n is 1,2,3,...
=> y can be even or odd => Not sufficient to answer the question.

Question 2:

(1) Just "try and error" with some numbers:
4+3
8+3
12+3
16+3
20+3 (Here it is)

So the least number that devide 4 or 5 with a remainder 3 would be 23 that is greater than 21. Enough to answer the question
(2) x must be an multiple of 21. Enough to answer the question too

Hope this clear _________________

I can, therefore I am

Last edited by tibeo - vietnam on 27 Sep 2005, 08:54, edited 1 time in total.

oh that seems correct. y can be divided by 2, 4, 8 and any power of 2.

Antmavel wrote:

I agree with asaratchandra Actually for the first question, I dont see how D is ok I agree that statement 1 is suff. However, concerning statement 2, Y can also be 2 or 4. No ???

HIMALAYA wrote:

good questions.

asaratchandra wrote:

If y is a positive integer, is 3y odd? 1) y+319 is even 2) y cannot be evenly divided by any odd number other than 1

from i, it is clear that y is odd. from ii, y is 1, not any other values.

so both are sufficient......

asaratchandra wrote:

If the integer x is positive, is x>17? 1) When x is divided by 4 or 5, the remainder is 3 2) x is evenly divisible by 21

from i, x is > than 17 because the minimum value that satisfies to have 3 as reminder when divided by eithr 4 or 5 is 23. from ii, x is > 17 because the lowest value that is evenly divided by 21 is 21.

For the 1st question: from the second statement the value can be 1,2,4 etc. Since the set contains the number 1 the statement is insufficient

for the 2nd question: x is positive, so x=3 is valid and that satisfies the first statement, thus this statement is insufficient.

any thoughts??

I agree with asaratchandra and I am not very fond of the two Ds...

Regarding the first problem: statement 1 is straightforward and obviously sufficient. Any non-negative power of 2 will satisfy the second condition. This means 1, 2, 4, 8, etc. In that case 3y can be either positive or negative.

Regarding the second problem: I agree that statement 2 is sufficient. But what about statement 1? y=3 does seem like a value, which satisfies the condition about the remainder...

I think the official answers could be wrong in this case.

Question 1: (1) y must be odd. Enough to anwer the question (2) y can be 1 or 2^n where n is 1,2,3,... => y can be even or odd => Not sufficient to answer the question.

Question 2:

(1) Just "try and error" with some numbers: 4+3 8+3 12+3 16+3 20+3 (Here it is)

So the least number that devide 4 or 5 with a remainder 3 would be 23 that is greater than 21. Enough to answer the question (2) x must be an multiple of 21. Enough to answer the question too

Hope this clear

If i have to type, i would type same explanation as did tibeo.
Can anyone point how 1st one results into D???

y cannot be evenly divided by any odd number other than 1

Q1 Answer is D. y + 319 is even then y is odd, hence 3y is odd.
y cannot be evenly divided by any odd number other than 1, hence y is odd so 3y is also odd.

Q2 Answer is D, if x is divisible by 4 or 5 then x should be divisible by 20, hence x should be > 17.
X is evenly divisible by 21, then x should be greater than 17.

For my Cambridge essay I have to write down by short and long term career objectives as a part of the personal statement. Easy enough I said, done it...