Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If z^2-4z > 5, then which of the following is always [#permalink]
13 Nov 2004, 08:16

If z^2-4z > 5, then which of the following is always true?

1. z>-5
2. z<5
3. z>-1
4. z<1
5. z<-1

The wording confused me and I dont think its right.
Lets see what you guys think of this question.
Please post your answers and then I'll reveal the OA.

Complex vision,
your ans is correct.
However, what confused me was the wording.
The question says 'which of the following must be true always'?

But as you showed, when x>5, the inequality holds true also.
So (this is becomng more of a logic problem now), if the inequality holdstrue, there is an alternative possibility (x>5) too. Hence we can not say that 'x<-1" always if you know the inequality holds!

Do you agree? I perferctly agree that out of the ans choices, what you have selected is the only right one. But the question doesnt sound right to me.

The wording is fine. If you have the choice b/w x>5 and x<-1, you will pick any answer that will be covered by those critical values. As a matter of fact, if the answer choices included x>10 or x<-10, they would also have been valid choices since those answers would have ALWAYS been true. Knowing that x<-1 is ALWAYS true does NOT mean that you are refuting the alternate answer x>5. It just means that you are accepting one answer as true nothwithstanding how true the alternate answer x>5 is. _________________

Complex vision, your ans is correct. However, what confused me was the wording. The question says 'which of the following must be true always'?

But as you showed, when x>5, the inequality holds true also. So (this is becomng more of a logic problem now), if the inequality holdstrue, there is an alternative possibility (x>5) too. Hence we can not say that 'x<-1" always if you know the inequality holds!

Do you agree? I perferctly agree that out of the ans choices, what you have selected is the only right one. But the question doesnt sound right to me.

I totaly agree with you mbahope... The problem depends on a logic principle, which is:

In order to make (A OR B) true statement

then one of the following should apply:

1. A is true
2. B is true
3. A AND B is true

In our case, the statement is Z>5 OR Z<-1
So, if ONLY ONE of them applies, then that is sufficient to make the whole statement true _________________

Thanks everyone.
Like complex v said, for example some result could be true if

1. A is true
2. B is true.
3. A and B are true

However that does not mean that we can say, "If the result is true, then A MUST be true( because it could be caused by B being true)! ". We can say the otherway round, however. i.e. If B is true, the result has to be true.
My concern is the wording of the question should have made that clear. Instead the question just asked this "If the result is true, must B also be true?"
B doesnt HAVE to be true for the result to be true. The result could be true if A were true (and in this case A is not a subset of B).
You guys see what I'm trying to say..

And like i said in my prev post, i agree that out of the ans choices, the only right one was the E. But the WORDING of what has been asked "If the inequality is true, which of the following MUST be true" doesnt make sense.

In this kind of "greater then" or "less then" problems, drawing a number lines helps. If you draw a number line and place the values, the answer becomes clear.

Agree with Aspire2005. So you found the critical values which are 5 and -1. You have in total 3 segments. Plug in -2, 0 and 6 and you will find which answers work and which don't. _________________

I think thats a grest suggestion and couldnt have come from a better person!
I tried to solve the problem again using this suggestion and it became so much easier to eliminate the wrong choices.
Great tip, aspire2005 and congrats again for your awesome score!

ComplexVision, can you explain how you got z < -1, when you solve the inequality you get (z-5)(z+1) > 0, so z > 5 or z > -1, where am I missing your point of z < -1

In this kind of "greater then" or "less then" problems, drawing a number lines helps. If you draw a number line and place the values, the answer becomes clear.

See if it works for you...

Hi, can you please show how does this work? I tried but didnt understand. _________________

ruhi - see the attachment. By solving the equation we got 2 numbers 5 and -1. Now, as Paul wrote, on the number line we get 3 segments - (a) numbers less then -1, (b) numbers between -1 and 5, (c) numbers greater then 5.

So, if you take one example from each and try out, you will figure out the answer

P.S.: For the first time I used Microsoft Visio software to draw a number line

The wording is fine. If you have the choice b/w x>5 and x<-1, you will pick any answer that will be covered by those critical values. As a matter of fact, if the answer choices included x>10 or x<-10, they would also have been valid choices since those answers would have ALWAYS been true. Knowing that x<-1 is ALWAYS true does NOT mean that you are refuting the alternate answer x>5. It just means that you are accepting one answer as true nothwithstanding how true the alternate answer x>5 is.

great explanation paul. the number line aspire came up with is also very cool. Just beware of inequalities and quadratic equations/polynomials. What would be true if this were (z-5)(z+1)=0 is not true when it's (z-5)(z+1)>0. You've got to step in and use your logic a little more carefully. The test would love you to make that mistake, so of course they're going to put the option in to choose the wrong answer.

Originally posted on MIT Sloan School of Management : We are busy putting the final touches on our application. We plan to have it go live by July 15...