Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 May 2013, 15:52
Customize  |  Hide

Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2006, 19:02
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have been found all around the globe, but they have been found in the greatest density in geologically stable regions. This relatively greater abundance of securely identified crater in geologically stable regions must be explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions.
The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?
(A) A meteorite that strikes exactly the same spot as an earlier meteorite will obliterate all traces of the earlier impact.
(B) Rates of destructive geophysical processes within any given region vary markedly throughout geological time.
(C) The rate at which the Earth is struck by meteorites has greatly increased in geologically recent times.
(D) Actual meteorite impacts have been scattered fairly evenly over the Earth’s surface in the course of Earth’s geological history.
(E) The Earth’s geologically stable regions have been studied more intensively by geologists than have its less stable regions.

Please explain
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 259
Location: New York City, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2006, 21:22
The author is trying to prove that "the geologically stable regions has lower rates of destructive geophysical processes than in any other regions". The reason he sites for this is the greater density of craters. But if most of the craters had smashed into the earth in that region alone, then the arguement will fail. D does the opposite.

My answer choice would be D.

- Vipin
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1134
Location: India
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2006, 21:24
I will pick D for this.
In the problem it is concluded that :
' must be explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions '
D states that ' Actual meteorite impacts have been scattered fairly evenly over the Earth’s surface '.
This means that due to lack of destructive geophysical processes in stable regions ,the craters could be identified as compared to other unstable regions where destructive geophysical processes might have removed their traces.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 634
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2006, 10:12
^ D ^

The argument says that craters have been created all over the earth, however, the geophysical destructions wore away their tracks in geologically active places. So, in geologically stable places it is more common to see craters.

If we assume D the conlusion in the argument works, because it puts forward the difference between geologically stable and active places.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 100
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2006, 16:07
IMO D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2006, 16:19
My answer was E
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2006, 17:04
vipin7um wrote:
The author is trying to prove that "the geologically stable regions has lower rates of destructive geophysical processes than in any other regions". The reason he sites for this is the greater density of craters. But if most of the craters had smashed into the earth in that region alone, then the arguement will fail. D does the opposite.

My answer choice would be D.

- Vipin


Nice. D is good here.

If we negate D conclusion no longer hold.
_________________

Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Mar 2006, 14:37
OA is D
  [#permalink] 09 Mar 2006, 14:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have GMATPIPO 13 08 Jan 2005, 14:52
New posts Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a chunjuwu 8 29 Apr 2005, 06:55
Popular new posts Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have WinWinMBA 12 10 May 2005, 16:14
New posts Meteorite explosions in the Earth s atmosphere as large as pi10t 4 04 Apr 2007, 19:42
New posts Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a noboru 5 20 Jul 2010, 14:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.