|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 508
Location: Kolkata
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
50
[1] , given: 66
|
In 1960, the average age at which a woman married was [#permalink]
25 Sep 2010, 12:21
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
14% (03:02) correct
85% (01:20) wrong based on 7 sessions
In 1960, the average age at which a woman married was between 20 and 21 years old. Currently, the average age at which a woman gets married is approximately 25 years old. Therefore, most new brides in 1960 were considerably younger than most new brides today.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument to the left?
A In the 1960’s, a higher percentage of the population was married than is married today.
B Because of the increased prevalence of divorce, more women are entering into second marriages in their 30s and 40s.
C Women today often choose to delay marriage as they spend their early 20s focusing on their careers.
D The majority of women who choose to get married today have college degrees, as opposed to the majority of women in the 1960s who chose to get married, who had only high school diplomas.
E Engagements were commonly shorter in the 1960s than they are today.
OA will follow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 230
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
42
[1] , given: 2
|
Re: Explanations plz... [#permalink]
25 Sep 2010, 12:41
1
This post received KUDOS
In 1960, the average age at which a woman married was between 20 and 21 years old. Currently, the average age at which a woman gets married is approximately 25 years old. Therefore, most new brides in 1960 were considerably younger than most new brides today.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument to the left?
A In the 1960’s, a higher percentage of the population was married than is married today. -This cannot be correct as it strengthens the argument
B Because of the increased prevalence of divorce, more women are entering into second marriages in their 30s and 40s. - The key word in the sentence is that it asks if new brides in the 60s are younger than new brides today. The question talks about the average age of brides then and now, this undoubtedly includes second, third, and nth marriages. Therefore Statement B, says because of more divorce today the average age is being pushed up - this throws into question the conclusion therefore weakening the argument. So B is correct.
C Women today often choose to delay marriage as they spend their early 20s focusing on their careers. - This cannot be correct as also strengthens the conclusion.
D The majority of women who choose to get married today have college degrees, as opposed to the majority of women in the 1960s who chose to get married, who had only high school diplomas. - Educational status does not directly address age, therefore this is not correct.
E Engagements were commonly shorter in the 1960s than they are today. -Length of engagements does not mention age and therefore has nothing to do with the conclusion, therefore its not correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 158
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[1] , given: 37
|
Re: Explanations plz... [#permalink]
25 Sep 2010, 12:52
1
This post received KUDOS
suyashjhawar wrote: In 1960, the average age at which a woman married was between 20 and 21 years old. Currently, the average age at which a woman gets married is approximately 25 years old. Therefore, most new brides in 1960 were considerably younger than most new brides today.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument to the left?
A In the 1960’s, a higher percentage of the population was married than is married today.
B Because of the increased prevalence of divorce, more women are entering into second marriages in their 30s and 40s.
C Women today often choose to delay marriage as they spend their early 20s focusing on their careers.
D The majority of women who choose to get married today have college degrees, as opposed to the majority of women in the 1960s who chose to get married, who had only high school diplomas.
E Engagements were commonly shorter in the 1960s than they are today.
OA will follow It is only between A and B. In A it just tels abt a higher portion got married, but does not say any age ranege. B gives a reason as why the average is 25years. If there were no divorce then they would have also been nearby the range of 21 or so.. hence B.
_________________
Thanks, VP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 508
Location: Kolkata
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
50
[0], given: 66
|
Re: Explanations plz... [#permalink]
26 Sep 2010, 07:35
Oa is B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 188
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
45
[0], given: 11
|
Re: Explanations plz... [#permalink]
27 Sep 2010, 03:19
has to be B
due to the second marriage at the age of 30-40, the average age is on the higher side (which is 25). although nowadays women are getting married at the age 21, because of the divorcees getting married for the second time at age 30-40, the average age is 25.
this weakens the argument that most new brides in 1960 were considerably younger than most new brides today.
SO B is the ans
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 508
Location: Kolkata
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
50
[0], given: 66
|
Re: Explanations plz... [#permalink]
27 Sep 2010, 06:55
correct
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Will Retake GMAT
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Posts: 138
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V32
GPA: 3.11
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 28
|
Re: Explanations plz... [#permalink]
27 Sep 2010, 07:20
definitely B
_________________
Re-taking GMAT. Hope the charm works this time..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Explanations plz...
[#permalink]
27 Sep 2010, 07:20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|