Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 11:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air [#permalink] New post 20 Dec 2010, 08:52
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

25% (04:20) correct 75% (01:39) wrong based on 7 sessions
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?

(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 66

Kudos [?]: 297 [0], given: 109

GMAT Tests User
Re: Air Pollution [#permalink] New post 20 Dec 2010, 09:48
IMO, it is D.

OA?
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Ross MBA/MS (SNRE) class of 2014
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 25
Location: USA
Schools: Ross (admit after WL), Foster (admit), Wharton (ding), Thunderbird (admit)
WE 1: US Army logistics
WE 2: Client management & business development (Russian Auditing & accounting firm)
WE 3: Sales for renewable energy firm
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: Air Pollution [#permalink] New post 20 Dec 2010, 13:54
Raths wrote:
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?

(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.


(A) Since the measures weren't implemented in '86-'88, that would explain the continued increase of high pollution days.
(B) This is the tricky and tempting answer, but IMHO a wrong one. The new equipment may be an adequate explanation which suggests that previous figures of pollution were overestimated due to inaccurate measures of inadequate equipment. Let's see if there is another explanation that is worse than this one.
(C) This is a pretty clear-cut explanation - what used to be considered "high pollution level" is now "normal".
(E) This is also a pretty clear-cut scientific explanation - pollutants take time to breakdown, so even if better controls were implemented, damage mitigation will not be immediately apparent.

(D) This is my choice. IMHO, this explanation isn't direct enough and it leaves us having to assume too much (i.e. we must assume that some action was taken to reverse the mayor's policies after the campaign donations scandal). This is by far the worst explanation of the bunch.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: Air Pollution [#permalink] New post 20 Dec 2010, 21:17
I felt B because introduction of new "instrument" would not affect the amount of pollutants . I will post the OA in a short while , after some more discussion .
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Air Pollution [#permalink] New post 20 Dec 2010, 22:19
DDDD...OMG.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 148
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: Air Pollution [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2010, 02:37
It is D !
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 708
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 37

GMAT Tests User
Re: Air Pollution [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2011, 00:15
+1 for D.

Crick
Re: Air Pollution   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2011, 00:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
16 Experts publish their posts in the topic In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air BlueRobin 29 26 May 2010, 04:06
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air cybera 9 14 Jul 2005, 13:51
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air mbamantra 13 26 Apr 2005, 07:31
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air karun_aggarwal 0 09 Apr 2005, 15:07
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air doggita 14 24 Oct 2004, 16:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.