|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air [#permalink]
07 Nov 2005, 20:02
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.
Pl. Explain your answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 14
Location: Toronto
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
D), Local industries that are exempted from pollution control, would this not increase the total pollution?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 587
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
wud go for D, because by the passage its not clear if these industries were really responsible for air pollution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR # the city of Los Diablos [#permalink]
08 Nov 2005, 03:58
vc019 wrote: In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography. Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989? (A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988. (B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented. (C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful. (D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures. (E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.
Pl. Explain your answer.
Let's summarize the trend: from 1986 to 1988, the air pollution level was rising ...in 1989, it drops. So what should explain that?
A. well reasons why there's the drop in 1989 since the measures were enacted in late 1988.
B : the same to A.
C also helps explain why there's the drop in 1989.
E : since the measures were enacted in early 1987 ...we can tell the level of ozone and CO. What is in E should be counted from 1987 ...thus E elaborates why there's the drop in 1989.
Using POE + the above reasons of other members, I would go for D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1741
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 0
|
lets see the answer choice. It is asking for argument LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989
A. Explains the argument
B. Explains it very well
C. Explains it.
D. fails to explain.
E. gives a reason.
So clearly it is D.
_________________
hey ya......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 230
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Gosh...this gave me a reeal headache..would have gone with B on exam day...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 254
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Clearly D !
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
B for best
We do not know the application of the invention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1135
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Bhai wrote: B for best
We do not know the application of the invention.
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
I go for D too
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
a) Out: The new controls maybe more comprehensive in that it is more accurate in measuring the pollution: this would explain the smog aleart drop in 1989
b) Out: Same as A
c) Out: New scale could be more stringent, catching more polluntants
d) Out: If companies are exempted from the control measures then they could emit more pollution without punishment. This could explain why the decrease in smog alert in 1989
I pick E. This does not explain anything and is the least useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1548
Location: Germany
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 0
|
B)...b/c we only know that this spectometer was invented but we dont know whether it was used...
_________________
If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2005
Posts: 102
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
D for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air
|
cybera |
9 |
14 Jul 2005, 14:51 |
|
|
|
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air
|
MBA2ran |
1 |
24 Nov 2006, 01:12 |
|
|
|
3) In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air
|
nitinneha |
1 |
23 Mar 2007, 15:13 |
|
|
|
1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air
|
cstefanita |
9 |
10 Dec 2007, 17:07 |
|
|
|
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air
|
suntaurian |
2 |
22 Feb 2008, 19:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|