Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 Jul 2014, 11:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2007, 21:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 908
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: cr air pollution [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2007, 21:30
nehanishika wrote:
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area


I go for D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2007
Posts: 52
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Cr- Air pollution [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2007, 21:52
C for me
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: cr air pollution [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2007, 23:14
nehanishika wrote:
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area


A, B, C, D - explains the contradiction

E for me
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 447
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2007, 23:24
I go for B
A new accurate gas spectrometer does not explain the decrease
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 01:10
I'd say E.

If it takes 2 years to break down, what happened to last years excess carbon monoxide and ozone
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Location: uk
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 01:49
I would go for B.
In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented. . This means the spectrometer used to test was quite accurate. So this will not explain the huge decrease in the number of alerts.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 02:20
Facts:
1 - since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography
2 - The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide
3 - In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect.
4 - In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted,
5 - but the city had smog alerts on 31 days in 1987 and on 39 days the 1988
6 - In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen

Let's look at the options now.

(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988. – Supports in explaining. So come 1989 the air pollution dropped

(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented. – Measured SMOG more accurately so the number alerts were less.

(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful. – Supports in explaining.The threshold was set higher for a smog alert. So less alarms.

(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures. - This clearly does not support. If this was true then the smog alerts would have gone down in 1988 itself but that is not the case. Smog alerts went up in 1988.

(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area – Supports in explaining.Once the Carbon Monooxide and Ozone of 1987 went down it result in less amount of smog due to new regulations.


Hence D is the answer.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 02:38
vc019 wrote:
Facts:
1 - since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography
2 - The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide
3 - In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect.
4 - In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted,
5 - but the city had smog alerts on 31 days in 1987 and on 39 days the 1988
6 - In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen

Let's look at the options now.

(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988. – Supports in explaining. So come 1989 the air pollution dropped

(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented. – Measured SMOG more accurately so the number alerts were less.

(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful. – Supports in explaining.The threshold was set higher for a smog alert. So less alarms.

(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures. - This clearly does not support. If this was true then the smog alerts would have gone down in 1988 itself but that is not the case. Smog alerts went up in 1988.

(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area – Supports in explaining.Once the Carbon Monooxide and Ozone of 1987 went down it result in less amount of smog due to new regulations.


Hence D is the answer.


Hmmm... B, C, D, E .. all choices are already selected.. pretty interesting.
Whats the OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 447
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 02:49
Give me B!
If the spectrometer is more accurate, it means that its measures must be higher, not smaller!
It doesn't explain the decrease! :-D
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 04:01
Caas wrote:
Give me B!
If the spectrometer is more accurate, it means that its measures must be higher, not smaller!
It doesn't explain the decrease! :-D


:lol: - that is not neccessary, it can be the other way round too!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: cr air pollution [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 12:25
OA is B
intially i was not getting that why it is B, i thought it to be D,
thanks dips for your explanation for B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 12:32
vc019 wrote:
Caas wrote:
Give me B!
If the spectrometer is more accurate, it means that its measures must be higher, not smaller!
It doesn't explain the decrease! :-D


:lol: - that is not neccessary, it can be the other way round too!


hmmm..i am confused.... :(
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 13:47
I thought of B as the answer but then realised what VC019 mentioned. Far more accurate means it wasnt accurate before and it is now.
It could also mean that previously it was showing the air unhealthy though the air wasn't.Now since it is accurate it can clearly say the air is healthy thus reducing the smog alerts.

i still think its D . Though D also justifies the scene slightly but least compared to other options.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2007, 20:45
Hi vc019,
See the explanation in the link below and you will be convinced that it is B.

http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=32988
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2007
Posts: 22
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: cr air pollution [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2007, 00:47
nehanishika wrote:
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area


For me it's quite tricky question because it seemed at first best answer was C. Indeed, B doesn't explain the drop in the number of days because :
- we didn't now if the invention is used or not
- even if, it would be used, it would not favor a drop or an increase because "more accuracy" of the machine will work on both directions.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2007, 23:48
vineetgupta wrote:
Hi vc019,
See the explanation in the link below and you will be convinced that it is B.

http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=32988


Hello vineetgupta,

I agree to the explaination on this link but really it also means that the option B is out of scope of this agrument. I would correct my explaination of point B and say it is out of scope and still say the answer is D.

The reason I would go with D and not with B now is -

B - Out of scope. Invention of a more accurate gas spectrometer does not fall in the scope of the argument.
One of the lessons I would take from this argument is "we should not make our own assumptions" - assuming here that the new spectrometer would be used is an assumption.

So, B does not weaken or strengthen the argument. Hence D is still the answer. :)

I would really like to know if this explaination is acceptable so that I can be sure that the line of thought is correct.
Regards

VC
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2007, 00:12
B is the best. Invention of a new tool/equipment will not cause a reduction in environmental pollution.
  [#permalink] 11 Jun 2007, 00:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air rao 24 07 Sep 2008, 15:39
3) In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air nitinneha 1 23 Mar 2007, 14:13
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air lali 5 03 Feb 2007, 07:42
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air vineetgupta 8 08 Nov 2006, 04:19
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air kripalkavi 6 31 Mar 2006, 19:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.