Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 May 2013, 23:16
Customize  |  Hide

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2008, 21:02
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
1. In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2008, 21:28
goalsnr wrote:
1. In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.


I pick D. One would expect that the mayor's action would increase pollution, not decrease it as indicated in the stimulus.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 101
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2008, 22:04
hl1711 wrote:
goalsnr wrote:
1. In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.


I pick D. One would expect that the mayor's action would increase pollution, not decrease it as indicated in the stimulus.


For me, the answer is B. Question is asking to find a choice that is least helpful to explain the situation. If B is true, then probably more cases were found in 1989.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: CR-Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2008, 22:17
clubzzang wrote:
hl1711 wrote:
goalsnr wrote:
1. In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.


I pick D. One would expect that the mayor's action would increase pollution, not decrease it as indicated in the stimulus.


For me, the answer is B. Question is asking to find a choice that is least helpful to explain the situation. If B is true, then probably more cases were found in 1989.


IIf B is true, then probably more cases were found in 1989
If B is true and hence more cases were found in 1989 then it must be a import reason not a least important one. The answer is correct but the logic is flawed .
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 747
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2008, 23:35
goalsnr wrote:
clubzzang wrote:

For me, the answer is B. Question is asking to find a choice that is least helpful to explain the situation. If B is true, then probably more cases were found in 1989.


IIf B is true, then probably more cases were found in 1989
If B is true and hence more cases were found in 1989 then it must be a import reason not a least important one. The answer is correct but the logic is flawed .


B because it says a gas spectrometer was invented but tells nothing about whether it got used by the city. :lol:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: CR-Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2008, 23:37
alpha_plus_gamma wrote:
goalsnr wrote:
clubzzang wrote:

For me, the answer is B. Question is asking to find a choice that is least helpful to explain the situation. If B is true, then probably more cases were found in 1989.


IIf B is true, then probably more cases were found in 1989
If B is true and hence more cases were found in 1989 then it must be a import reason not a least important one. The answer is correct but the logic is flawed .


B because it says a gas spectrometer was invented but tells nothing about whether it got used by the city. :lol:

Bingo!!!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 101
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2008, 23:41
deleted...sorry...
Re: CR-Los Diablos   [#permalink] 03 Jul 2008, 23:41
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air ak_idc 8 27 Oct 2006, 05:31
New posts 3) In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air nitinneha 1 23 Mar 2007, 15:13
New posts 1 In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air noboru 9 25 Jul 2009, 10:14
Popular new posts In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air bholakc 11 02 Sep 2011, 09:05
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air Marcab 5 21 Aug 2012, 11:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.