Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 20:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to [#permalink] New post 25 Sep 2010, 01:24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (low)

Question Stats:

72% (02:26) correct 28% (01:30) wrong based on 64 sessions
In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to support the unemployed citizens. In 1998,8 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to such funds, although that unemployment rate has decreased in 1998 than in 1992.
Each of the following, if true, could explain the simultaneous increase in percent of every dollar paid in tax to support the unemployed citizens and decrease in the number of unemployment rate EXCEPT:

A. On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992.

B. On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992.

C. The individuals had paid more tax than did enterprises during this period.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992.

E. The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998.

Plz explain this one..
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 456
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 46

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR Resolve the Paradox Percentages [#permalink] New post 25 Sep 2010, 01:39
Its C - out of the scope of information provided in question.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 411
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 50

Re: CR Resolve the Paradox Percentages [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2010, 19:00
Narrowed down on option C and D.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992 -- figured out that if the income reduced since 1992, to keep up with the same level of tax, the percentage of income taxed should move up and that explains the increase in the tax %.

Hence option C should be the answer.

Option A, B and E was easy to eliminate because of straight forward logic.

_________________

:good Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog :thanks

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1692
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 274 [0], given: 36

GMAT Tests User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: CR Resolve the Paradox Percentages [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2011, 00:44
In 1992, 0.5T1 = Allowance-1


In 1998, 0.8T2 = Allowance-2

T1 - Tax Money in 1992
T2 - Tax Money in 1998

A. On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992. - Hence more Money was be given by increasing Allowance, it's clear that Allowance-2 > Allowance-1.

B. On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less.


C. The individuals had paid more tax than did enterprises during this period. Awkward choice.


D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less


E. The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less


So it's clear from answer choices that except C, all other account for increase in Allowance or Decrease in Tax Money. So the answer is C.

_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 6

Re: CR Resolve the Paradox Percentages [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2011, 02:29
Comparison should be between tax paid in 1992 and in 1998,not between individual groups.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 285
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR Resolve the Paradox Percentages [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2011, 03:35
We are looking for an option that says that lesser total amount of support was provided (since less no of people were unemployed) in 1998 than in 1992. If per dollar of tax more cents were taken, the total amount of dollars should decrease from 1992 to 1998 to make the product lesser. i.e. if 8 % of Y< 5 % of X, clearly Y should be less than X.
So any option which says less total tax was collected in 1998 than that collected in 1992 is correct. Lets check:
B says directly that less tax was paid in 1998, E says tax evaders were more in 1998 which can imply that total tax collected decreased, and D says that income itself decreased, which means tax wouls have decreased too. B, E, D eliminated.
A says that the support provided per person was more in 1998- this provides for less no . of people to support- as the product which is total support would still remain as much or more in 1992. thus it supports too.

C is irrelevant and doesnt support.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 272
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR Resolve the Paradox Percentages [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2011, 11:54
was down to A and C.. Went with C
Re: CR Resolve the Paradox Percentages   [#permalink] 17 Mar 2011, 11:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to crejoc 10 18 Aug 2009, 08:04
1 In 1960, 10 percent of every dollar paid in automobile ConkergMat 11 23 Feb 2009, 06:55
Connie paid a sales tax of 8 percent on her purchase. If the RyanDe680 6 09 May 2008, 17:58
1 In 1960, 10 percent of every dollar paid in automobile seongbae 6 20 Jan 2008, 07:23
Pat invested x dollars in a fund that paid 8 percent annual M8 2 09 May 2006, 00:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.