In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 14:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2010, 01:24
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (02:26) correct 35% (01:44) wrong based on 383 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to support the unemployed citizens. In 1998,8 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to such funds, although that unemployment rate has decreased in 1998 than in 1992.
Each of the following, if true, could explain the simultaneous increase in percent of every dollar paid in tax to support the unemployed citizens and decrease in the number of unemployment rate EXCEPT:

A. On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992.

B. On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992.

C. The individuals had paid more tax than did enterprises during this period.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992.

E. The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998.

Plz explain this one..
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 454
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 46

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2010, 01:39
Its C - out of the scope of information provided in question.
Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 408
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 50

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2010, 19:00
Narrowed down on option C and D.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992 -- figured out that if the income reduced since 1992, to keep up with the same level of tax, the percentage of income taxed should move up and that explains the increase in the tax %.

Hence option C should be the answer.

Option A, B and E was easy to eliminate because of straight forward logic.
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1672
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 514 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2011, 00:44
In 1992, 0.5T1 = Allowance-1

In 1998, 0.8T2 = Allowance-2

T1 - Tax Money in 1992
T2 - Tax Money in 1998

A. On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992. - Hence more Money was be given by increasing Allowance, it's clear that Allowance-2 > Allowance-1.

B. On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less.

C. The individuals had paid more tax than did enterprises during this period. Awkward choice.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less

E. The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less

So it's clear from answer choices that except C, all other account for increase in Allowance or Decrease in Tax Money. So the answer is C.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 164
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2011, 02:29
Comparison should be between tax paid in 1992 and in 1998,not between individual groups.
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 285
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2011, 03:35
We are looking for an option that says that lesser total amount of support was provided (since less no of people were unemployed) in 1998 than in 1992. If per dollar of tax more cents were taken, the total amount of dollars should decrease from 1992 to 1998 to make the product lesser. i.e. if 8 % of Y< 5 % of X, clearly Y should be less than X.
So any option which says less total tax was collected in 1998 than that collected in 1992 is correct. Lets check:
B says directly that less tax was paid in 1998, E says tax evaders were more in 1998 which can imply that total tax collected decreased, and D says that income itself decreased, which means tax wouls have decreased too. B, E, D eliminated.
A says that the support provided per person was more in 1998- this provides for less no . of people to support- as the product which is total support would still remain as much or more in 1992. thus it supports too.

C is irrelevant and doesnt support.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 268
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2011, 11:54
was down to A and C.. Went with C
Intern
Joined: 27 Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 09-04-2014
GPA: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 14

Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2014, 02:56
we can easily eliminate A B and e which leave us with two c and d
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 152
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 24

Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2015, 23:32
Whether individuals or enterprises paid more tax does not explain why there is increase in percentage of per dollar tax paid to unemployed. Hence C is right.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to   [#permalink] 04 Aug 2015, 23:32
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 The dollar amount of federal tax revenues gained from personal income 8 04 Jun 2015, 23:23
1 In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to 10 18 Aug 2009, 08:04
1 In 1960, 10 percent of every dollar paid in automobile 11 23 Feb 2009, 06:55
One state adds a 7 percent sales tax to the price of most 3 05 May 2008, 16:28
4 In 1960, 10 percent of every dollar paid in automobile 7 20 Jan 2008, 07:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by