Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 06:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2009, 08:04
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

62% (02:49) correct 38% (01:57) wrong based on 17 sessions
In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to support the unemployed citizens. In 1998, 8 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to such funds, although that unemployment rate has decreased in 1998 than in 1992.
Each of the following, if true, could explain the simultaneous increase in percent of every dollar paid in tax to support the unemployed citizens and decrease in the number of unemployment rate EXCEPT:

A.On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992.

B.On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992.

C.The individuals had paid more tax than did enterprises during this period.

D.Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992.

E.The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998.

OA later after discussion..
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 27
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [1] , given: 0

Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2009, 08:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
There are two ways of explaining the apparent paradox:
- tax "revenues" decreased more than the unemployment rate, i.e. there were fewer funds available to pay for only slightly fewer unemployed people
- tax "costs" increased more than the decrease in unemployment, i.e. the administration paid much more to marginally fewer unemployed people

A fits in the second category, while B, D and E all fit in the first category. This leaves C. The structure of tax collected is irrelevant here. We're interested in the way it's spent, not collected.

Last edited by DanaJ on 18 Aug 2009, 10:45, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2009, 10:04
DanaJ wrote:
There are two ways of explaining the apparent paradox:
- tax "revenues" decreased more than the unemployment rate, i.e. there were fewer funds available to pay for only slightly fewer unemployed people
- tax "costs" increased more than the decrease in unemployment, i.e. the administration paid much more to marginally fewer unemployed people

A fits in the second category, while B, D and E all fit in the first category. This leaves B. The structure of tax collected is irrelevant here. We're interested in the way it's spent, not collected.


is there any typo error?, You seem to have missed mentioning option C in your explanation,.. your analysis is very good,

IMO C seems to be the answer, who paid more tax individuals or enterprises does not resolve the paradox,
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 27
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2009, 10:45
Yes, it was a typo. You are right :)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2009, 06:15
OA: C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 455
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2009, 07:22
C for me: No info provided between people & corporations!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2009
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2009, 09:39
+1 C
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 611
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 100

GMAT Tests User
Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2009, 21:17
The question asks.. increase in percent of every dollar paid in tax to support the unemployed citizens what does that mean?
_________________

countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2009, 21:43
tejal777 wrote:
The question asks.. increase in percent of every dollar paid in tax to support the unemployed citizens what does that mean?


The question asks to resolve the paradox,
If unemployment rate decreases, the money spend to support must also decrease, but instead it has increased. so how?
What could resolve this paradox? decrease in unemployment at the same time increase in dollar to support it.. hope this helps. If not let me know. But the actual question is which doesnot resolve the paradox, note the "EXCEPT" at the end.
VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1365
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 18 May 2011, 01:02
crystal C here.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Completed GMAT on 22 Nov 2011
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 167
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 12

GMAT Tests User
Re: unemployment rate [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2011, 04:52
Another C
Re: unemployment rate   [#permalink] 09 Jun 2011, 04:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to john85 7 25 Sep 2010, 01:24
1 In 1960, 10 percent of every dollar paid in automobile ConkergMat 11 23 Feb 2009, 06:55
Connie paid a sales tax of 8 percent on her purchase. If the RyanDe680 6 09 May 2008, 17:58
1 In 1960, 10 percent of every dollar paid in automobile seongbae 6 20 Jan 2008, 07:23
Pat invested x dollars in a fund that paid 8 percent annual M8 2 09 May 2006, 00:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.