Hello Everyone!
Let's tackle this question, one problem at a time, and narrow it down to the correct answer! First, here is the original question with any major differences between the options highlighted in
orange:
In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs,
a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.
(A) a phenomenon that is explained
not just because of more expensive drugs
but by the fact that doctors
are writing(B) a phenomenon that is explained
not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive
but also by the fact that doctors
are writing(C) a phenomenon occurring
not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive
but because of doctors
having also written(D) which occurred
not just because drugs are becoming more expensive
but doctors
are also writing(E) which occurred
not just because of more expensive drugs
but because doctors
have also writtenWhile there are a lot of differences between the options, there are a couple glaring differences we can focus on to start:
1. not just... / but... (Idioms)
2. are writing / having also written / are also writing / have also written (verb tense & meaning)Let's start with #1 on our list: idiom structure. Here is a quick breakdown of the idiom we're using here, and which forms of it are acceptable:
not just X, but also Y =
GOODnot just X, but Y =
GOODRemember that in any idiom that includes X and Y, they both MUST use parallel structure! Let's take a closer look at each option, and rule out any that don't use the idiom or parallelism correctly:
(A) a phenomenon that is explained
not just because of more expensive drugs
but by the fact that doctors are writing -->
NOT PARALLEL(B) a phenomenon that is explained
not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive
but also by the fact that doctors are writing -->
PARALLEL(C) a phenomenon occurring
not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive
but because of doctors having also written -->
PARALLEL(D) which occurred
not just because drugs are becoming more expensive
but doctors are also writing -->
NOT PARALLEL(E) which occurred
not just because of more expensive drugs
but because doctors have also written -->
NOT PARALLELWe can eliminate options A, D, & E because they don't use parallel structure within the idiom we're using here.Now that we've narrowed it down to only 2 options, let's tackle #2 on our list: verb tense & meaning. Read over each option carefully, and make sure that the meaning is clear and logical:
(B) a phenomenon that is explained
not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive
but also by the fact that doctors
are writingThis is
CORRECT! The idiom "not just X, but also Y" is used correctly and has parallel structure throughout. The verb "are writing" is also clear and makes sense here logically.
(C) a phenomenon occurring
not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive
but because of doctors
having also writtenThis is
INCORRECT. While the idiom is used correctly, and it uses parallel structure, there's a problem with the verb at the end. By adding in the word "also," the sentence now suggests that the doctors did more than one thing - but we don't know what the other thing is! WHAT did they do in addition to writing prescriptions? It's unclear, so let's rule this out because it's not logical to say doctors "also" did something when we only see one action in the sentence.
There you have it - option B is the correct choice! By focusing on the simple, yet obvious differences first, we were able to narrow down our options significantly to make the process go quickly!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
EMPOWERgmat
Total GMAT Content & Tactical Training | 120 Point Guarantee | All 6 Official GMAT Tests
empowergmat.com