In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue was estimated at nearly : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 22:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue was estimated at nearly

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 591
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 661 [0], given: 20

In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue was estimated at nearly [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2010, 19:11
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

45% (01:24) correct 55% (01:13) wrong based on 31 sessions

In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue was estimated at nearly $17.4 million, accounting for 0.6 percent of total revenue for domestic fast food eateries, triple the figure for 1999 A. B. three times more than 1999 C. three times as much as 1999 D. triple the number that it was in 1999 E. a number triple that which occurred in 1999 As usual, your rational for making a choice is appreciated. [Reveal] Spoiler: OA _________________ KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you. If you have any questions you can ask an expert New! Manager Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 55 Location: Washington DC Schools: Kellogs, Darden, Stern, Tepper Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 15 Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink] ### Show Tags 04 Aug 2010, 19:30 IMO A, as choice A is precise and correct!, which states the intended meaning in fewer words. _________________ Give and Take Kudos! if you are benefitted from a post! Manager Joined: 02 Aug 2009 Posts: 58 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 2 Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink] ### Show Tags 04 Aug 2010, 20:20 B and C : compare 'revenue' with '1999' D and E: Awkward and wordy A: Is perfect Director Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 591 Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance Followers: 18 Kudos [?]: 661 [0], given: 20 Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Aug 2010, 01:03 Yes, A is unambiguous. Even "triple the number" is more concise than "three times the number." However, the non-underlined part contains the expression "estimated at..." My understanding is that "estimated at" applies to a place, but this is not the case. Can anyone clarify this? Source of the question is GROCKIT.COM PRACTICE TEST. _________________ KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you. SVP Joined: 17 Feb 2010 Posts: 1558 Followers: 19 Kudos [?]: 572 [0], given: 6 Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Aug 2010, 08:01 In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue was estimated at nearly$17.4 million, accounting for 0.6 percent of total revenue for domestic fast food eateries, triple the figure for 1999.

A. triple the figure for 1999 - CORRECT
B. three times more than 1999 - the figure ($17.4 million) is incorrectly compared with '1999' C. three times as much as 1999 - the figure ($17.4 million) is incorrectly compared with '1999'
D. triple the number that it was in 1999 - awkward
E. a number triple that which occurred in 1999 - awkward
Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 198
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 7

Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2010, 09:29
A it is.. other choices make incorrect comparison
_________________

Gotta hit the 700 score this time... 3rd time lucky !
Give me some kudos... Like you, even I need them badly

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 5

Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2010, 04:02
A.. triple the figure.. accurate
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 481
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 10

Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2010, 05:38
Can some one please explain what's wrong with B?
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 198
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 7

Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2010, 11:20
onedayill wrote:
Can some one please explain what's wrong with B?

choice B: 3 times more than 1999
As per my understanding it should be "3 times more than in 1999".. The "in" is missing..

The original choice B somehow implies 4 * 1999 ( 3 times more than 1999 )
_________________

Gotta hit the 700 score this time... 3rd time lucky !
Give me some kudos... Like you, even I need them badly

Re: In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue   [#permalink] 06 Aug 2010, 11:20
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 When the damage left by the 2004 tsunami 6 02 Feb 2014, 11:55
13 In 2004, Burger Buster's revenue was estimated at nearly 18 19 Jun 2011, 08:16
In 2004, resulting from the destruction caused by the 7 29 Oct 2010, 04:34
4 In 2004, resulting from the destruction caused by the 10 07 Oct 2008, 06:28
Officials in Australia estimate that revenues from casinos 2 23 Jul 2008, 23:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by