Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 02 Jun 2015, 01:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Posts: 30
Location: United States
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [1] , given: 31

In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]  24 Nov 2012, 07:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:30) correct 58% (01:28) wrong based on 80 sessions
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?

A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Status: Life begins at the End of your Comfort Zone
Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 47
Location: Tajikistan
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.86
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 4

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]  24 Nov 2012, 11:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
That would be (C), the thoughts behind my choice set forth below:
Let it be:
2007 - x
2008 - x+0.3x=1.3x
2009 - 1.3x*1.3=1.69x
2010 - (x-1.69x)/1.69x = - 0.69x/1.69x = -0.408~-41%
_________________

God loves the steadfast.

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1228
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 80

Kudos [?]: 866 [3] , given: 116

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]  24 Nov 2012, 11:13
3
This post received
KUDOS
joylive wrote:
In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets than it did in 2007, and its production in 2009 was 130% of its production in 2008. By approximately what percent would its production need to decrease the following year for the factory to produce the same number of widgets it did in 2007?
A. 30%
B. 39%
C. 41%
D. 69%
E. 169%

Lets assume no. of widgets in 07 = 100
Number of widgets in 08 = 130
Number of widgets in 09 = 169

Decrease required = $$\frac{169-100}{169} = \frac{69}{169}$$

= 41%

Answer is C.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 5000
Followers: 300

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]  11 Sep 2014, 05:15
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 126
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 171

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]  24 Sep 2014, 07:27
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!
Manager
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 240
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 69 [1] , given: 125

Re: In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]  24 Sep 2014, 08:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
nitin6305 wrote:
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!

(69+1)/(169+1)>69/169
70/170>69/169
7/17>69/169
0.411>69/169

Therefore, 69/169 is slightly less than 0.411 or almost 0.41 (41%)
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1071
Followers: 291

Kudos [?]: 876 [2] , given: 4

In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets [#permalink]  24 Sep 2014, 09:00
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
nitin6305 wrote:
The question is pretty easy, but if someone could highlight how to approximate 69/169 to 41%? There is a close answer choice of 39% as well, this takes up a lot of time in a real test and you end up getting a supposedly easy question wrong!

I don't think you'll ever need to worry about this on the real GMAT - in real GMAT questions asking for estimates, the answers will usually be far enough apart that you can actually estimate fairly easily. But even in this case, there are a couple of interesting techniques we can use to bypass long division.

Here, if you can tell the right answer choice is either 39% or 41%, you really just need to know if 69/169 > 0.4 to pick the right answer. There are a few ways to make that decision quickly. You might locate a fraction which is exactly equal to 4/10 and that looks similar to 69/169. Notice if we multiply by 17 in the numerator and denominator, we find that 4/10 = 68/170. But notice now that 69/169 > 68/170, since 69/169 has both a larger numerator and a smaller denominator than 68/170. So 69/169 > 0.4, and 0.41 is a better estimate than 0.39.

Or you could notice that (0.4)*169/169 is exactly equal to 0.4 (just cancel the 169), and is exactly equal to 67.6/169. Since this is clearly smaller than 69/169, we can see that 69/169 is larger than 0.4.

If you prefer to avoid decimals, you can instead write down the following inequality (this method is mathematically the same as the one above, though) :

69/169 > 4/10

We want to know if this is true. If it is, then when we rewrite it, what we arrive at must be true. If you multiply by 169 and 10 on both sides, you find

690 > 4*169 = 676

and since this is true, the original inequality was true as well.

If you know that rounding 69/169 to 70/170 = 7/17 has only a negligible influence on the overall value of the fraction, then the above techniques are even easier to apply, but I've not done that here since it may not be clear how much that approximation will affect the fraction's value.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets   [#permalink] 24 Sep 2014, 09:00
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 A factory produces x widgets per day. The factory's fixed costs are \$8 3 06 Feb 2015, 06:43
1 If a certain factory makes a total of 30,720 wrenches, how many minute 5 14 Nov 2014, 08:46
6 At a certain factory, 10 percent of the staplers produced on 5 25 Nov 2013, 11:49
27 Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours work 15 03 Apr 2010, 12:22
Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours 3 18 May 2007, 16:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In 2008, a certain factory produced 30% more widgets

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.