Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 May 2013, 11:21
Customize  |  Hide

In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 101
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear, [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2008, 23:59
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg, x% lost all four limbs. The minimum value of x is?

Please advise the best way to solve this problem
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 213
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: PS (sets) [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 00:53
85%
leg is subset of 4 limbs ( i suppose ^^). So those lost 4 limbs sure lost leg
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3596
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 231

Kudos [?]: 1300 [0], given: 346

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: PS (sets) [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 01:15
az780 wrote:
In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg, x% lost all four limbs. The minimum value of x is?


terrible :(
it is a strange question...
So, 70% an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg.

1. an eye and and an ear: p=[50%,70%]
2. (an eye and and an ear) and an arm: p=[25%,70%]
3. ((an eye and and an ear) and an arm) and a leg: p=[10%,70%]

Therefore, min: 10%, max: 70%
_________________

iOS/Android: GMAT ToolKit - The bestselling GMAT prep app | GMAT Club (free) | PrepGame | GRE ToolKit | LSAT ToolKit
PROMO: Are you an exiting GMAT ToolKit (iOS) user? Get GMAT ToolKit 2 (iOS) for only $0.99 (read more)
Math: GMAT Math Book ||| General: GMATTimer ||| Chicago Booth: Slide Presentation
The People Who Are Crazy Enough to Think They Can Change the World, Are the Ones Who Do.

SVP
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1946
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: PS (sets) [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 02:15
walker wrote:
az780 wrote:
In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg, x% lost all four limbs. The minimum value of x is?


terrible :(
it is a strange question...
So, 70% an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg.

1. an eye and and an ear: p=[50%,70%]
2. (an eye and and an ear) and an arm: p=[25%,70%]
3. ((an eye and and an ear) and an arm) and a leg: p=[10%,70%]

Therefore, min: 10%, max: 70%


This is really funny problem. I can not stand when I read it. :P :P :P
Anyway, Walker! I try to but can not follow your logic! Sets always make me confused! Please give me some detail. Your approach strange also :lol:
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3596
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 231

Kudos [?]: 1300 [0], given: 346

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: PS (sets) [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 02:39
sondenso wrote:
This is really funny problem. I can not stand when I read it. :P :P :P
Anyway, Walker! I try to but can not follow your logic! Sets always make me confused! Please give me some detail. Your approach strange also :lol:


:)
1. Let we have two attributes: A and B.
2. Let a% of people have A and b% of people have B.
3. we will try to find max and min ab% (the percentage of people that have two attributes)

I'll try to draw:

the maximum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb--------------| 100%
max=min(a,b)

the minimum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|---------------bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb| 100%
min=b-(100-a)=a+b-100. if min<0 then min have to be 0

for example, a=75%, b=87%

max=min(75%,87%)=75%
min=87%-(100%-75%)=62%
_________________

iOS/Android: GMAT ToolKit - The bestselling GMAT prep app | GMAT Club (free) | PrepGame | GRE ToolKit | LSAT ToolKit
PROMO: Are you an exiting GMAT ToolKit (iOS) user? Get GMAT ToolKit 2 (iOS) for only $0.99 (read more)
Math: GMAT Math Book ||| General: GMATTimer ||| Chicago Booth: Slide Presentation
The People Who Are Crazy Enough to Think They Can Change the World, Are the Ones Who Do.

SVP
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1946
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: PS (sets) [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2008, 19:34
walker wrote:
sondenso wrote:
This is really funny problem. I can not stand when I read it. :P :P :P
Anyway, Walker! I try to but can not follow your logic! Sets always make me confused! Please give me some detail. Your approach strange also :lol:


:)
1. Let we have two attributes: A and B.
2. Let a% of people have A and b% of people have B.
3. we will try to find max and min ab% (the percentage of people that have two attributes)

I'll try to draw:

the maximum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb--------------| 100%
max=min(a,b)

the minimum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|---------------bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb| 100%
min=b-(100-a)=a+b-100. if min<0 then min have to be 0

for example, a=75%, b=87%

max=min(75%,87%)=75%
min=87%-(100%-75%)=62%


Thank you Walker, you are great! :thanks
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Re: PS (sets)   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2008, 19:34
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an khurman 4 04 Jul 2004, 08:24
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC A man bought 10 crates of oranges for $80 total. If he lost scoobee 3 12 Oct 2004, 13:39
New posts I lost my battle against GMAT - 580 ( Q 42, V 28) Amit05 7 28 Dec 2006, 09:20
New posts %age=(Income 80 – Income70)/Income70 JohnLewis1980 4 18 May 2008, 13:12
New posts 1 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC During 2001, a stock lost 80 percent of its value Chembeti 2 03 Mar 2012, 21:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.