Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 May 2013, 22:56
Customize  |  Hide

In a certain business, production index p is directly

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

In a certain business, production index p is directly [#permalink] New post 07 May 2008, 00:49
00:00

Question Stats:

60% (01:59) correct 40% (01:05) wrong based on 15 sessions
In a certain business, production index p is directly proportional to efficiency index e, which is in turn directly proportional to investment i. What is p if i = 70?

(1) e = 0.5 whenever i = 60
(2) p = 2.0 whenever i = 50
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Bunuel on 02 Mar 2012, 14:05, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 716
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG - proportional index [#permalink] New post 07 May 2008, 01:31
we need P when i is some value...

we know p is dependent on e and e is dependent on i

In a certain business, production index p is directly proportional to efficiency index e, which is in turn directly proportional to investment i. What is p if i = 70?

1) e = 0.5 whenever i = 60 -> does not give the value or relation between e and P thus insufficient
2) p = 2.0 whenever i = 50 -> gives the relation between p and i thus we can find p when i=70

thus B
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

SVP
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1612
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG - proportional index [#permalink] New post 07 May 2008, 07:22
i say B as well, unless im missing something.

From stat 1, you know relationship btwn e and i, but you dont know what it is btwn p and e ... so insuff.

From stat 2, you are given the relationship btwn p and i, and from the stem you know what i is. so suff.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 173
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Re: OG - proportional index [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2010, 19:50
Would p be directly proportional to i as well if e is proportional to p? I am thinking it should be, however the constant proportion will be different between p and e and e and i and thus entirely separate between p and i? thanks.
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club team member
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11506
Followers: 1791

Kudos [?]: 9526 [1] , given: 826

Re: OG - proportional index [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2010, 01:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
gettinit wrote:
Would p be directly proportional to i as well if e is proportional to p? I am thinking it should be, however the constant proportion will be different between p and e and e and i and thus entirely separate between p and i? thanks.


a is directly proportional to b means that as the absolute value of b gets bigger, the absolute value of a gets bigger too, so there is some non-zero constant x such that a=xb;

So if a is directly proportional to b (a=xb), then vise-versa is also correct: b is directly proportional to a (b=\frac{1}{x}*a as the absolute value of a gets bigger, the absolute value of b gets bigger too).

a is inversely proportional to b means that as the absolute value of b gets bigger, the absolute value of a gets smaller, so there is some non-zero constant constant y such that a=\frac{y}{b}.

So if a is inversely proportional to b (a=\frac{y}{b}), then vise-versa is also correct: b is inversely proportional to a (b=\frac{y}{a} as the absolute value of a gets bigger, the absolute value of b gets smaller).

As for the question:
In a certain business, production index p is directly proportional to efficiency index e, which is in turn directly proportional to investment i. What is p if i = 70?

Given: p=ex and e=iy (for some constants x and y), so p=ixy. Question: p=70xy=? So, basically we should find the value of xy.

(1) e = 0.5 whenever i = 60 --> as e=iy then 0.5=60y --> we can find the value of y, but still not sufficient.
(2) p = 2.0 whenever i = 50 --> as p=ixy then 2=50xy --> we can find the value of xy. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3104
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 567

Kudos [?]: 1994 [0], given: 92

Re: OG - proportional index [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2010, 06:41
gettinit wrote:
Would p be directly proportional to i as well if e is proportional to p? I am thinking it should be, however the constant proportion will be different between p and e and e and i and thus entirely separate between p and i? thanks.


production index p is directly proportional to efficiency index e,
implies p = ke (k is the constant of proportionality)

e is in turn directly proportional to investment i

implies e = mi (m is the constant of proportionality. Note here that I haven't taken the constant of proportionality as k here since the constant above and this constant could be different)

Then, p = kmi (km is the constant of proportionality here. It doesn't matter that we depict it using two variables. It is still just a number)

e.g. if p = 2e and e = 3i
p = 6i will be the relation. 6 being the constant of proportionality.

So if you have i and need p, you either need this constant directly (as you can find from statement 2) or you need both k and m (statement 1 only gives you m).
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 173
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Re: OG - proportional index [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2010, 21:54
Thanks Karishma and Bunuel very helpful explanations.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2013
Posts: 47
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-05-2013
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 7

In a certain business production index p is directly [#permalink] New post 16 May 2013, 09:03
In a certain business, production index P is directly proportional to efficiency index E,which is in turn directly proportional to investment index i ,What is P if i = 70.?

(1) e = 0.5 whenever i = 60.
(2) p = 2.0 whenever i = 50.
_________________

"Kudos" will help me a lot!!!!!!Please donate some!!!

Completed
Official Quant Review

In Progress
Official Verbal Review
OG 13th ed
MGMAT IR
AWA Structure

Yet to do
100 700+ SC questions
MR Verbal
MR Quant


Verbal is a ghost. Cant find head and tail of it.

GMAT Club team member
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11506
Followers: 1791

Kudos [?]: 9526 [0], given: 826

Re: In a certain business production index p is directly [#permalink] New post 16 May 2013, 09:12
SrinathVangala wrote:
In a certain business, production index P is directly proportional to efficiency index E,which is in turn directly proportional to investment index i ,What is P if i = 70.?

(1) e = 0.5 whenever i = 60.
(2) p = 2.0 whenever i = 50.


Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.
_________________

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2013
Posts: 47
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-05-2013
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 7

Re: In a certain business, production index p is directly [#permalink] New post 16 May 2013, 09:17
If P id directly proportional to E then what is the relation between them?

Is it only P = E * x

Or can it also be P = E*x + y.

In both the cases P is directly proportional to E. As in the question the author doesn't mention anything about the values of the variables when either of them is zero, it leads to a confusing situation.

Please Clarify
_________________

"Kudos" will help me a lot!!!!!!Please donate some!!!

Completed
Official Quant Review

In Progress
Official Verbal Review
OG 13th ed
MGMAT IR
AWA Structure

Yet to do
100 700+ SC questions
MR Verbal
MR Quant


Verbal is a ghost. Cant find head and tail of it.

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3104
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 567

Kudos [?]: 1994 [0], given: 92

Re: In a certain business, production index p is directly [#permalink] New post 17 May 2013, 09:02
SrinathVangala wrote:
If P id directly proportional to E then what is the relation between them?

Is it only P = E * x

Or can it also be P = E*x + y.

In both the cases P is directly proportional to E. As in the question the author doesn't mention anything about the values of the variables when either of them is zero, it leads to a confusing situation.

Please Clarify


It is P = E*k only.
It cannot be P = E*k + m

Directly proportional means that if one doubles, other doubles too. If one becomes half, other becomes half too.
It doesn't happen in case you add a constant.

P = 2E + 1
If E = 5, P = 11
If E = 10, P = 21
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Re: In a certain business, production index p is directly   [#permalink] 17 May 2013, 09:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts In a certain formula, p is directly proportional to s and Curly05 2 06 Aug 2003, 08:54
New posts In a certain formula, p is directly proportional to s and tingle 2 09 Oct 2005, 22:26
New posts In a certain business, production index p is directly mrmikec 9 15 Jun 2006, 01:16
New posts Production index p is directly proportional to efficiency judokan 4 25 Jun 2008, 07:22
New posts 1 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor megafan 6 05 Feb 2013, 18:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a certain business, production index p is directly

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.