Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Feb 2013, 17:25

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:39) correct
58% (01:50) wrong based on 108 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?

In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?

Next post will discuss a similar question using both. I have tried to show every step here to avoid confusion but on the blog, I am going to be more direct. By the way, the question is not very GMAT-like.

\(x = ky^2\) (x is directly proportional to y^2. k is any constant) \(xz = k\) (I am assuming that indirectly is actually inversely proportional)

Both together, \(\frac{xz}{y^2} = k\) (Assume z to be constant, you get x is directly proportional to y^2. Assume y to be constant, you get x is inversely proportional to z)

\(\frac{x_1*z_1}{(y_1)^2} = \frac{x_2*z_2}{(y_2)^2}\) Given that \(z_2 = (\frac{1}{2})z_1\) and that \(x_1\)should be equal to \(x_2\). What is the relation between \(y_1\) and \(y_2\)?

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Feb 2013, 20:58

megafan wrote:

In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?

(A) 100% increase

(B) 50% increase

(C) 30% increase

(D) 30% decrease

(E) 50% decrease

Source: Gmat Hacks 1800

The entire expression can be written in the form \(x=k*y^2/z\). When z is halved, the expression becomes \(x=2k*y^2/z\). In order to make this expression equal to its initial form, we need to divide this expression by 2. This can be done by reducing \(y\) to \(y/\sqrt{2}\). Therefore percent change= \(y-y/1.414\)=>\(0.414y/1.414\). This is almost equal to 30%. Hope this helps.
_________________

In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?

(A) 100% increase

(B) 50% increase

(C) 30% increase

(D) 30% decrease

(E) 50% decrease

Source: Gmat Hacks 1800

Original question from GMAT Prep:

Quote:

The rate of a certain chemical reaction is directly proportional to the square of the concentration of chemical A present and inversely proportional to the concentration of chemical B present. If the concentration of chemical B is increased by 100 percent, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the concentration of chemical A required to keep the reaction rate unchanged?

A. 100% decrease B. 50% decrease C. 40% decrease D. 40% increase E. 50% increase

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Feb 2013, 08:50

Bunuel wrote:

megafan wrote:

In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?

(A) 100% increase

(B) 50% increase

(C) 30% increase

(D) 30% decrease

(E) 50% decrease

Source: Gmat Hacks 1800

Original question from GMAT Prep:

Quote:

The rate of a certain chemical reaction is directly proportional to the square of the concentration of chemical A present and inversely proportional to the concentration of chemical B present. If the concentration of chemical B is increased by 100 percent, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the concentration of chemical A required to keep the reaction rate unchanged?

A. 100% decrease B. 50% decrease C. 40% decrease D. 40% increase E. 50% increase

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Feb 2013, 22:44

1

This post received KUDOS

Normally i plug numbers to see what happens if certain change applies, i am not sure whether i am doing correct but please comment if anything wrong in my method:

Let say the efficiency index y=10 and investment index=1, so, per question terms, production index x=y^2/x=10^2/1=100; now we change the investment index to half (i assumed that it has been decreased to half since it is not clear in the question) and we have the following: 100=y^2/0.5=(y^2)*2=100 --> y=\sqrt{50} --> equals to about 7, then we can see that efficiency index should be reduced to approximately 30% (from 10 to 7).

I hope that my way of thinking is correct.
_________________

If you found my post useful and/or interesting - you are welcome to give kudos!

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Apr 2013, 00:59

Marcab wrote:

The entire expression can be written in the form \(x=k*y^2/z\). When z is halved, the expression becomes \(x=2k*y^2/z\). In order to make this expression equal to its initial form, we need to divide this expression by 2. This can be done by reducing \(y\) to \(y/\sqrt{2}\). Therefore percent change= \(y-y/1.414\)=>\(0.414y/1.414\). This is almost equal to 30%. Hope this helps.

I used the same method but skipped the calculations since you know that since z is being halved y also has to decrease. There are only 2 options that decrease. If i plug in 50, the condition isn't met and hence 30 is the answer. You should be able to deduce this in less than 30 secs.
_________________

You've been walking the ocean's edge, holding up your robes to keep them dry. You must dive naked under, and deeper under, a thousand times deeper! - Rumi

http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index.php/author/cbermanmanhattanprep-com/ - This is worth its weight in gold

Economist GMAT Test - 730, Q50, V41 Aug 9th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test - 670, Q45, V36 Aug 11th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test - 680, Q47, V36 Aug 17th, 2013 GmatPrep CAT 1 - 770, Q50, V44 Aug 24th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test - 690, Q45, V39 Aug 30th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test - 710, Q48, V39 Sep 13th, 2013 GmatPrep CAT 2 - 740, Q49, V41 Oct 6th, 2013

GMAT - 770, Q50, V44, Oct 7th, 2013 My Debrief - http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-the-ashes-thou-shall-rise-770-q-50-v-44-awa-5-ir-162299.html#p1284542

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jul 2014, 01:25

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Sep 2016, 16:40

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...