In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 16:28
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

8 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 128 [8] , given: 2

In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2013, 09:01
8
This post received
KUDOS
24
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:47) correct 58% (01:44) wrong based on 604 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed diseases are schistosomiasis and malaria. Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases, and schistosomiasis, which accounted for 40% of all disease cases in the community five years ago, accounted for 30% in the past year.

Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?

A) There were fewer cases of schistosomiasis last year than five years ago.
B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years.
C) Some disease has experienced an increase in the number of its total cases, as long as the total number of disease cases went down by a number less than 30%.
D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis.
E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 136
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 45 [3] , given: 3

Premium Member
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed dise [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2013, 09:45
3
This post received
KUDOS
its E :
think like this : if initially the total number of disease were 100 then S accounted for 40 case now if increase these cases of S even to 41 then total number of cases of disease must be made to around 136 ----> which means that total number of diseases have increased by more than 30 percent !!
4 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 252

Kudos [?]: 2802 [4] , given: 123

Premium Member
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed dise [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2013, 13:34
4
This post received
KUDOS
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed diseases are schistosomiasis and malaria. Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases, and schistosomiasis, which accounted for 40% of all disease cases in the community five years ago, accounted for 30% in the past year.

Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?

A) There were fewer cases of schistosomiasis last year than five years ago.
Wrong. The fact that the percentage is less than that in the past does not mean the absolute value is also less. ==> Eliminate right away.

B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years.
Wrong. No information of percentage of disease cases from malaria in the past ==> Eliminate right away.

C) Some disease has experienced an increase in the number of its total cases, as long as the total number of disease cases went down by a number less than 30%.
Wrong. Quite confused. However, it's wrong because of "some disease" is not clear. In this question, we just talk about Malaria and schistosomiasis.

D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis.
Wrong. Shell game. But it's wrong because it says "Each year".

E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%.
Correct. five years ago, the number of schistosomiasis cases was 40/100 total number of disease cases (40%). Last year, the number of schistosomiasis was 60 ==> Total number of disease cases was (60 /30%)x100% = 200 ==> Total disease cases increased 100% that is more than 30%.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 924
Followers: 288

Kudos [?]: 782 [1] , given: 25

Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed dise [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2013, 20:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
How about a fraction approach?

If the percentage of cases has dropped from 40 to 30, that means there are 3/4 as many cases per 100 as there were before. In order for the actual number to go up, there needs to be an increase in the total disease cases of more than 4/3. (3/4 x 4/3 = 1, so anything greater than 4/3 will lead to an increase.) This means that for the # of cases of schistosomiasis to go up, we need an increase of more than 1/3. E is correct.

C, on the other hand, is saying something that *seems* kind of sensible. If the % of schistosomiasis cases goes down, and the total number doesn't drop drastically, then doesn't something else need to go down? The answer is no. If schistosomiasis goes down, and everything else stays the same, it can represent 30% of all cases without anything else having to go up. This leads to a drop in total cases of about 15%.

To illustrate, imagine that the original breakdown is like this: 51 cases of malaria, 40 cases of schistosomiasis, and 9 cases of flu. What # of schistosomiasis cases would yield a new % of 30 if the # of malaria and flu cases stay the same?
Schist/Total = s/(51+9+s) = .30
s = .3(60 + s)
.7s = 18
s is about 25, so the new total is about 85, which is just a 15% drop.

Don't you love doing algebra in the verbal section? :/
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10444
Followers: 887

Kudos [?]: 192 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2014, 05:29
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 149
Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 75

Premium Member
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2014, 22:16
Assume that the total no of cases were initially 100.
Total =100

Malaria = 51

schistosomiasis = 40

other = 9.

schistosomiasis accounts for 40 %;

Let us try to analyze choice E by working from backwards.

Total no of diseases = 100;

An increase of 30 % in total = 130;

Assuming that Malaria and other diseases remian constant , then increase in number of schistosomiasis can be calculated as follows

M =41 O =9 S = 70 ;

70/130 = 53% (more than 30%)
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 933
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 132

Kudos [?]: 807 [0], given: 546

Reviews Badge
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2014, 00:00
manugmat123 wrote:
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed diseases are schistosomiasis and malaria. Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases, and schistosomiasis, which accounted for 40% of all disease cases in the community five years ago, accounted for 30% in the past year.

Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?

A) There were fewer cases of schistosomiasis last year than five years ago.
B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years.
C) Some disease has experienced an increase in the number of its total cases, as long as the total number of disease cases went down by a number less than 30%.
D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis.
E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%.


As soon as we see %, there will be some catch with total number of cases.
A) There were fewer cases of schistosomiasis last year than five years ago - Cannot be inferred
B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years - Cannot be inferred
C) Some disease has experienced an increase in the number of its total cases, as long as the total number of disease cases went down by a number less than 30%.
This is not possible as "S" % wise went down, so if the total number of cases of "S" went up, the total number of all cases has to go up and not down

D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis We don't have each year data, cannot be infered
E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%.
Looks ok.
Calculation wise.
5 years back for "S" disease
100 Total cases - "S" disease - 40 - Percentage = 40%
if we have to maintain the same cases
Percentage = 30%
"S" disease cases = 40
Then total should be close to 130 as 13*3 = 39
Hence Option E)

_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
Struggling with GMAT ? Experience http://www.gmatify.com/
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
My Linkedin Handle: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAIAAAbtjagB9G1MrEzTRYDRGroXuSmZO0ZhoK0

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10444
Followers: 887

Kudos [?]: 192 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2015, 02:03
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2015, 03:37
DmitryFarber wrote:
How about a fraction approach?

If the percentage of cases has dropped from 40 to 30, that means there are 3/4 as many cases per 100 as there were before. In order for the actual number to go up, there needs to be an increase in the total disease cases of more than 4/3. (3/4 x 4/3 = 1, so anything greater than 4/3 will lead to an increase.) This means that for the # of cases of schistosomiasis to go up, we need an increase of more than 1/3. E is correct.

C, on the other hand, is saying something that *seems* kind of sensible. If the % of schistosomiasis cases goes down, and the total number doesn't drop drastically, then doesn't something else need to go down? The answer is no. If schistosomiasis goes down, and everything else stays the same, it can represent 30% of all cases without anything else having to go up. This leads to a drop in total cases of about 15%.

To illustrate, imagine that the original breakdown is like this: 51 cases of malaria, 40 cases of schistosomiasis, and 9 cases of flu. What # of schistosomiasis cases would yield a new % of 30 if the # of malaria and flu cases stay the same?
Schist/Total = s/(51+9+s) = .30
s = .3(60 + s)
.7s = 18
s is about 25, so the new total is about 85, which is just a 15% drop.

Don't you love doing algebra in the verbal section? :/


Hello Dmitry,
Could you please explain
I could get this part If the percentage of cases has dropped from 40 to 30, that means there are 3/4 as many cases per 100 as there were before
But after 4/3 is of what (number of total number of cases before or now ) ?
Thanks
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2015, 03:38
DmitryFarber wrote:
How about a fraction approach?

If the percentage of cases has dropped from 40 to 30, that means there are 3/4 as many cases per 100 as there were before. In order for the actual number to go up, there needs to be an increase in the total disease cases of more than 4/3. (3/4 x 4/3 = 1, so anything greater than 4/3 will lead to an increase.) This means that for the # of cases of schistosomiasis to go up, we need an increase of more than 1/3. E is correct.

C, on the other hand, is saying something that *seems* kind of sensible. If the % of schistosomiasis cases goes down, and the total number doesn't drop drastically, then doesn't something else need to go down? The answer is no. If schistosomiasis goes down, and everything else stays the same, it can represent 30% of all cases without anything else having to go up. This leads to a drop in total cases of about 15%.

To illustrate, imagine that the original breakdown is like this: 51 cases of malaria, 40 cases of schistosomiasis, and 9 cases of flu. What # of schistosomiasis cases would yield a new % of 30 if the # of malaria and flu cases stay the same?
Schist/Total = s/(51+9+s) = .30
s = .3(60 + s)
.7s = 18
s is about 25, so the new total is about 85, which is just a 15% drop.

Don't you love doing algebra in the verbal section? :/


Hello Dmitry,
Could you please explain
I could get this part If the percentage of cases has dropped from 40 to 30, that means there are 3/4 as many cases per 100 as there were before
But after 4/3 is of what (number of total number of cases before or now ) ?
Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2015
Posts: 122
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 70

Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2015, 05:00
I got this question correct.
Eliminated A B D. B/w C and E, without algebra I got the hint that what E is trying to say.

C talks about other disease. so eliminated.

I would still like to know what option C says. I could not comprehend this option in exam. Even now I am not able to understand whats its trying to say.
I could still not understand from above answer what C means.
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 357
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 159 [2] , given: 403

Reviews Badge
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2015, 06:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
manugmat123 wrote:
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed diseases are schistosomiasis and malaria. Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases, and schistosomiasis, which accounted for 40% of all disease cases in the community five years ago, accounted for 30% in the past year.

Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?

A) There were fewer cases of schistosomiasis last year than five years ago.
B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years.
C) Some disease has experienced an increase in the number of its total cases, as long as the total number of disease cases went down by a number less than 30%.
D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis.
E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%.


E basically says-(if..hypothetical.....)

If 40% x < 30 % y , (where x = total cases 5 years ago and y= total cases in past year)

then ( y-x )/x > 1/3 ( after solving the inequality stated )


hence , increase IN TOTAL number of cases has been more than 33.3 % ( 33.33% is more than 30 %)

The above can be true based on the argument.

Hope the simple inequality helps state why E is right.

I DONOT MIND KUDOS :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2016, 06:19
I have a small doubt in this question and i request people to clarify ,

I chose option D and was wrong . It is mentioned in the premise that " Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases " , so i inferred that every year malaria has accounted for more than 50% of the cases . cant we conclude that " Over the past 5 years " means all the years within the range of those 5 years ?

because if we can conclude that Malaria did account for more than 50% for all 5 years , then schistosomiasis would naturally account for less than 50% over these years and then we can easily conclude that option D would be correct
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Posts: 69
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V26
GMAT 2: 590 Q49 V21
GMAT 3: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 2.8
WE: Other (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 5

Reviews Badge
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2016, 08:32
rohitmilind007ster wrote:
I have a small doubt in this question and i request people to clarify ,

I chose option D and was wrong . It is mentioned in the premise that " Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases " , so i inferred that every year malaria has accounted for more than 50% of the cases . cant we conclude that " Over the past 5 years " means all the years within the range of those 5 years ?

because if we can conclude that Malaria did account for more than 50% for all 5 years , then schistosomiasis would naturally account for less than 50% over these years and then we can easily conclude that option D would be correct

It says "over the past five years,...cases" --> average is more than 50 % not each year. One year it can be 99% and other year it can be less than 30%. The number varies but average is more than 50%. I also fell in to this trap.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 364
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: Yale '18
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 244

Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2016, 22:47
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed diseases are schistosomiasis and malaria. Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases, and schistosomiasis, which accounted for 40% of all disease cases in the community five years ago, accounted for 30% in the past year.

Over the past five years

S m others
50>

five years ago
S m others
40%

past year
S m others
30%


Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?

B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years.

You don't know total cases of disease before 5 year & over the past 5 years. This would have been true if total cases of disease equal for both cases.


D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis.

We know about over the past year thing but we don't have any info about each year individually.


E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%.


assume total no. of disease are same, it's possible that total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years increases anyway.

Over the past five years

S m others
50>

five years ago
S m others
40%

How E is correct?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 873
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.65
WE: Brand Management (Health Care)
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 199 [0], given: 29

Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2016, 05:20
abrakadabra21 wrote:
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed diseases are schistosomiasis and malaria. Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases, and schistosomiasis, which accounted for 40% of all disease cases in the community five years ago, accounted for 30% in the past year.

Over the past five years

S m others
50>

five years ago
S m others
40%

past year
S m others
30%


Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?

B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years.

You don't know total cases of disease before 5 year & over the past 5 years. This would have been true if total cases of disease equal for both cases.


D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis.

We know about over the past year thing but we don't have any info about each year individually.


E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%.


assume total no. of disease are same, it's possible that total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years increases anyway.

Over the past five years

S m others
50>

five years ago
S m others
40%

How E is correct?


Lets assume total number of schistosomiasis cases remained same.

Let those cases be 100.

Now, 5 years ago, such cases were 40% or 40.

Past year, such cases were 30% = 30.

But as per E, it says if we increase such cases. But as per the scenario we have taken, we are actually decreasing such cases.

Hence, Total cannot be the same.

So, if I say 5 years it was 100 and S cases were 40. I must assume that past year such an increase would have been atleast 41.

So, we have 41 = 30% of total.

or Total = 136.

So, you can see we have an increase of 36 or 36%.

Hence, an increase of atleast 30%. So, E is correct.
_________________

Thanks.

-- Please hit Kudos if you get the answer.

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1092
Location: India
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 538 [0], given: 71

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2016, 07:21
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed diseases are schistosomiasis and malaria.
Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases, and
schistosomiasis, which accounted for 40% of all disease cases in the community five years ago, accounted for 30% in the past year.

Notice the pattern of data given. Data regarding malaria is given over a time whereas data at two times is given for Schisto.....

Which of the following must be true on the basis of the statements above?

A) There were fewer cases of schistosomiasis last year than five years ago........Percentage reduction from 40% to 30% cannot infer the number of cases. We need population data as well.

B) The percentage of disease cases from malaria has increased over the past 5 years.......were given overall data for past 5yrs i.e., more than 50% but no info is given regarding change either increase or decrease.

C) Some disease has experienced an increase in the number of its total cases, as long as the total number of disease cases went down by a number less than 30%.............This choice seems really vague. Keep it aside.

D) Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis........In case of malaria we have overall data for 5 years so we cannot say this.

E) If the total number of schistosomiasis cases increased over the past five years, then the total number of disease cases must have increased by more than 30%............Left over choice and makes a bit sense more than C or nay other choices. This picked out of POE. Pick numbers as
total disease population say TDP 5yrs back is 100
Schi cases are 40
last yr Schi cases are increased to say >40 = 42(since 41 is not mutiple of 3)
42=30%TDP
last yr TDP= 140

difference in TDP is from 100 to 140 is 40% (which is more than 30%)
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 60
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2016, 13:50
chaitanya87 wrote:
rohitmilind007ster wrote:
I have a small doubt in this question and i request people to clarify ,

I chose option D and was wrong . It is mentioned in the premise that " Over the past five years, malaria has accounted for more than half of all disease cases " , so i inferred that every year malaria has accounted for more than 50% of the cases . cant we conclude that " Over the past 5 years " means all the years within the range of those 5 years ?

because if we can conclude that Malaria did account for more than 50% for all 5 years , then schistosomiasis would naturally account for less than 50% over these years and then we can easily conclude that option D would be correct

It says "over the past five years,...cases" --> average is more than 50 % not each year. One year it can be 99% and other year it can be less than 30%. The number varies but average is more than 50%. I also fell in to this trap.



No where average term is used in argument.
Many said that Each in the (D) is wrong, but when argument clearly says malaria has accounted for more than 50% in the past 5 years
Need clear reason why D is wrong or better than E.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1092
Location: India
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 538 [0], given: 71

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2016, 18:35
ravikrishna1979 wrote:

No where average term is used in argument.
Many said that Each in the (D) is wrong, but when argument clearly says malaria has accounted for more than 50% in the past 5 years
Need clear reason why D is wrong or better than E.


ravikrishna1979

For example salary package of prev 5 yrs in an mnc is as follows
yr1: 3LPA
yr2: 4LPA(increment)
yr3: 3LPA(salary reduced due to lower band..............it happens trust me)
yr4 and 5: Resigned and unemployed for 2 yrs

Overall salary is 2LPA

But can we say each year your salary was more than some X's say 10K.
No right yr4 and 5 you did not have a salary and cannot have more salary than 10K.

Now option D SAYS

Quote:
Each year over the past five, malaria has accounted for a larger percentage of disease cases than schistosomiasis.

Isnt the scenario same? So D is incorrect for same reason.

I hope this helps :wink:

_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 39
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 57

Reviews Badge
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2016, 21:16
What is the source of this question?
Re: In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed   [#permalink] 14 Sep 2016, 21:16
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Hawks in a certain region depend heavily for their diet kk07734 4 08 Aug 2015, 04:44
23 In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed thelosthippie 6 02 May 2013, 23:44
2 The number of people diagnosed as having a certain sarb 1 28 Jun 2012, 18:49
The number of people diagnosed as having a certain bacterial feruz77 2 20 Oct 2010, 00:59
9 The number of people diagnosed as having a certain bacterial feruz77 8 20 Oct 2010, 00:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a certain population, the two most heavily diagnosed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.