GetThisDone wrote:
In a certain state, hunting permits require the hunter to be at least 18 years old, possess a valid driver's license or state identification, and have completed a safety program within the past 5 years. The hunter must also sign a legal document pledging not to consume alcohol while hunting.
Which of the following can be correctly inferred from the above statements?
(A) All states have the same requirements for hunting permits.
(B) Hunters under the age of 21 don't need to sign the alcohol pledge because they are not legally allowed to drink alcohol under any circumstances.
(C) If a person last completed the safety program six years ago, he will have to complete the program again before he can be eligible for a permit in this state.
(D) Someone who isn't 18 years old cannot obtain a hunting permit in this state.
(E) Hunting is such a dangerous activity that state controls and requirements are necessary to ensure that nobody gets hurt.
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
We are asked to determine what we can infer based upon the given information; on the GMAT, whatever we infer must be based only upon the argument itself and cannot extend beyond the scope of that argument.
(A) The argument says nothing about requirements in other states; this choice is out of scope.
(B) While it may be illegal for those under 21 to consume alcohol, the argument makes no mention of special rules for this age category. Indeed, the argument says that "hunters" have to sign the pledge, not just "hunters aged 21 and over."
(C) CORRECT. The argument says that the hunter must have completed a safety program within the past five years. If he has not, then he will have to do so before he can be eligible for a permit. (Note that this choice doesn't say he will get a permit if he completes the program again; we don't know what other requirements he may not meet. We only know that he will have to retake the program, at least, before he can become eligible.)
(D) This choice mentions someone who "isn't 18 years old." Someone who isn't 18 can be either younger than 18 or older than 18 and, according to the argument, those older than 18 are eligible for permits if they complete all of the requirements.
(E) While this may be true as a general rule, it is outside of the scope of the argument, which mentions nothing about danger or why these rules were enacted. In addition, any requirements cannot "ensure" that nobody ever gets hurt; they can only help to minimize risks.