In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the ro : GMAT Problem Solving (PS)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 05:43

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the ro

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 76
Location: chennai
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [3] , given: 0

In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the ro [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jun 2010, 18:41
3
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (03:33) correct 54% (02:15) wrong based on 219 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping. If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units, what is his son’s height?

A. 25 units
B. 33 units
C. 35 units
D. 37 units
E. Insufficient data
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Bunuel on 26 Mar 2014, 06:28, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Location: Turkey
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

07 Jun 2010, 03:35
I have found the answer is 33

It takes a bit time, do you have any practical way?
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 417
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 161

Show Tags

17 Nov 2010, 22:37
hmm... i need to follow this one up...

Thanks for the question.
_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36609
Followers: 7099

Kudos [?]: 93510 [1] , given: 10568

Show Tags

18 Nov 2010, 05:32
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
lnarayanan wrote:
In,a Hemisphere igloo,an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping.If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units,What is his son’s height?
A) 25 units , B) 33 units , C) 35 units , D) 37 units ,E) Insufficient data

Look at the diagram below:
Attachment:

AngleSemicircle.gif [ 3.75 KiB | Viewed 6109 times ]
Now, the RADIUS of the igloo equals to the hight of the Eskimo, so $$R=65$$. As the child can play over an area of 9,856 square units then the radius of this playing are is: $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}=9,856$$ --> $$r^2=\frac{9,856}{\pi}$$ --> $$r\approx{56}$$. Thus the child's height will be $$H=\sqrt{R^2-r^2}=\sqrt{65^2-56^2}=33$$.

_________________
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 4

Show Tags

20 Nov 2010, 14:31
Bunuel wrote:
lnarayanan wrote:
In,a Hemisphere igloo,an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping.If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units,What is his son’s height?
A) 25 units , B) 33 units , C) 35 units , D) 37 units ,E) Insufficient data

Look at the diagram below:
Attachment:
AngleSemicircle.gif
Now, the RADIUS of the igloo equals to the hight of the Eskimo, so $$R=65$$. As the child can play over an area of 9,856 square units then the radius of this playing are is: $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}=9,856$$ --> $$r^2=\frac{9,856}{\pi}$$ --> $$r\approx{56}$$. Thus the child's height will be $$H=\sqrt{R^2-r^2}=\sqrt{65^2-56^2}=33$$.

Hi Bunnel ,
Got 2 doubts here
1) Aint the area should be $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}/2$$ since its an hemisphere ?
2) While we are just concentrating on the right half should the area that of the quarter ?
M confused or may be i'm thinking in the wrong direction , Please explain .
_________________

This time , its my time .

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36609
Followers: 7099

Kudos [?]: 93510 [0], given: 10568

Show Tags

21 Nov 2010, 00:52
girisshhh84 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
lnarayanan wrote:
In,a Hemisphere igloo,an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping.If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units,What is his son’s height?
A) 25 units , B) 33 units , C) 35 units , D) 37 units ,E) Insufficient data

Look at the diagram below:
Attachment:
AngleSemicircle.gif
Now, the RADIUS of the igloo equals to the hight of the Eskimo, so $$R=65$$. As the child can play over an area of 9,856 square units then the radius of this playing are is: $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}=9,856$$ --> $$r^2=\frac{9,856}{\pi}$$ --> $$r\approx{56}$$. Thus the child's height will be $$H=\sqrt{R^2-r^2}=\sqrt{65^2-56^2}=33$$.

Hi Bunnel ,
Got 2 doubts here
1) Aint the area should be $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}/2$$ since its an hemisphere ?
2) While we are just concentrating on the right half should the area that of the quarter ?
M confused or may be i'm thinking in the wrong direction , Please explain .

I think you are just confused with the diagram:

Hemisphere is half of a sphere and the diagram gives the cross section of it. But the base of a hemisphere (the base of an igloo) is still a circle, so the playing area of the child is a circle limited by his height.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 181
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 20

Show Tags

21 Nov 2010, 13:15
Surface area of sphere is - 4 * pi (r)^2

Shoulden't area of hemisphere be -2 * pi (r)^2 ????
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 113
Schools: ISB '15
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 60

Show Tags

26 Mar 2014, 05:12
Bunuel wrote:
lnarayanan wrote:
In,a Hemisphere igloo,an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping.If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units,What is his son’s height?
A) 25 units , B) 33 units , C) 35 units , D) 37 units ,E) Insufficient data

Look at the diagram below:
Attachment:
AngleSemicircle.gif
Now, the RADIUS of the igloo equals to the hight of the Eskimo, so $$R=65$$. As the child can play over an area of 9,856 square units then the radius of this playing are is: $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}=9,856$$ --> $$r^2=\frac{9,856}{\pi}$$ --> $$r\approx{56}$$. Thus the child's height will be $$H=\sqrt{R^2-r^2}=\sqrt{65^2-56^2}=33$$.

Hi Bunuel,
you can remove the approx sign.

9856/pi = 9856*7/22 = 56 exactly.
_________________

Veritas Prep - 650
MGMAT 1 590
MGMAT 2 640 (V48/Q31)

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36609
Followers: 7099

Kudos [?]: 93510 [0], given: 10568

Show Tags

26 Mar 2014, 06:38
seabhi wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
lnarayanan wrote:
In,a Hemisphere igloo,an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping.If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units,What is his son’s height?
A) 25 units , B) 33 units , C) 35 units , D) 37 units ,E) Insufficient data

Look at the diagram below:
Attachment:
AngleSemicircle.gif
Now, the RADIUS of the igloo equals to the hight of the Eskimo, so $$R=65$$. As the child can play over an area of 9,856 square units then the radius of this playing are is: $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}=9,856$$ --> $$r^2=\frac{9,856}{\pi}$$ --> $$r\approx{56}$$. Thus the child's height will be $$H=\sqrt{R^2-r^2}=\sqrt{65^2-56^2}=33$$.

Hi Bunuel,
you can remove the approx sign.

9856/pi = 9856*7/22 = 56 exactly.

$$\pi=3.141592653589793238462643383279502884...$$ (it goes on forever) is an irrational number, it cannot be represented as the ratio of two integers.

$$\frac{22}{7}=3.1428...$$ is only an approximate value of $$\pi$$.

P.S. In that sense this is not a good quality question.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 22 Feb 2014
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 3

Re: In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the ro [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 May 2014, 20:37
1
KUDOS
9856 = 7*64*22. 22/7 is what we call as pi (at least an approximation of pi). So 9856/pi = 7*64*22/(22/7) = 7*7*64 = 3136. 3136 is 56^2. Easier than approximation.
Intern
Joined: 13 May 2014
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

17 May 2014, 10:03
Bunuel wrote:
lnarayanan wrote:
In,a Hemisphere igloo,an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping.If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units,What is his son’s height?
A) 25 units , B) 33 units , C) 35 units , D) 37 units ,E) Insufficient data

Look at the diagram below:
Attachment:
AngleSemicircle.gif
Now, the RADIUS of the igloo equals to the hight of the Eskimo, so $$R=65$$. As the child can play over an area of 9,856 square units then the radius of this playing are is: $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}=9,856$$ --> $$r^2=\frac{9,856}{\pi}$$ --> $$r\approx{56}$$. Thus the child's height will be $$H=\sqrt{R^2-r^2}=\sqrt{65^2-56^2}=33$$.

I had the solution to this problem in under a minute or so but couldn't actually compute the answer. Are we really supposed to be able to solve $$\sqrt{\frac{9,856}{\pi}}$$ without a calculator? That seems like a stretch to me, but maybe I'm missing something... Is assuming $$\pi \approx \frac{22}{7}$$ a standard assumption for this exam?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36609
Followers: 7099

Kudos [?]: 93510 [0], given: 10568

Show Tags

18 May 2014, 00:01
GordonFreeman wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
lnarayanan wrote:
In,a Hemisphere igloo,an Eskimo’s head just touches the roof when he stands erect at the centre of the floor, but his son can play over an area of 9856 square units without stooping.If the Eskimo’s height is 65 units,What is his son’s height?
A) 25 units , B) 33 units , C) 35 units , D) 37 units ,E) Insufficient data

Look at the diagram below:
Attachment:
AngleSemicircle.gif
Now, the RADIUS of the igloo equals to the hight of the Eskimo, so $$R=65$$. As the child can play over an area of 9,856 square units then the radius of this playing are is: $$playing \ area=\pi{r^2}=9,856$$ --> $$r^2=\frac{9,856}{\pi}$$ --> $$r\approx{56}$$. Thus the child's height will be $$H=\sqrt{R^2-r^2}=\sqrt{65^2-56^2}=33$$.

I had the solution to this problem in under a minute or so but couldn't actually compute the answer. Are we really supposed to be able to solve $$\sqrt{\frac{9,856}{\pi}}$$ without a calculator? That seems like a stretch to me, but maybe I'm missing something... Is assuming $$\pi \approx \frac{22}{7}$$ a standard assumption for this exam?

As I've written above this is not a proper GMAT question because we need to approximate $$\pi$$ to get the answer, while the question does not ask about approximate height. GMAT would never do that.

As for $$\pi \approx \frac{22}{7}$$: this is a good/standard approximation for some problems asking for an approximate answer.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 13 May 2014
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

18 May 2014, 16:39
Bunuel wrote:
I had the solution to this problem in under a minute or so but couldn't actually compute the answer. Are we really supposed to be able to solve $$\sqrt{\frac{9,856}{\pi}}$$ without a calculator? That seems like a stretch to me, but maybe I'm missing something... Is assuming $$\pi \approx \frac{22}{7}$$ a standard assumption for this exam?

As I've written above this is not a proper GMAT question because we need to approximate $$\pi$$ to get the answer, while the question does not ask about approximate height. GMAT would never do that.

As for $$\pi \approx \frac{22}{7}$$: this is a good/standard approximation for some problems asking for an approximate answer.[/quote]

Are we expected to know the square root of 3,136 is 56 off the top of our heads as well? I'm just trying to get a sense for what I need to memorize.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7130
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2140

Kudos [?]: 13702 [0], given: 222

Show Tags

18 May 2014, 22:30
GordonFreeman wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
I had the solution to this problem in under a minute or so but couldn't actually compute the answer. Are we really supposed to be able to solve $$\sqrt{\frac{9,856}{\pi}}$$ without a calculator? That seems like a stretch to me, but maybe I'm missing something... Is assuming $$\pi \approx \frac{22}{7}$$ a standard assumption for this exam?

As I've written above this is not a proper GMAT question because we need to approximate $$\pi$$ to get the answer, while the question does not ask about approximate height. GMAT would never do that.

As for $$\pi \approx \frac{22}{7}$$: this is a good/standard approximation for some problems asking for an approximate answer.

Are we expected to know the square root of 3,136 is 56 off the top of our heads as well? I'm just trying to get a sense for what I need to memorize.

No. There is very little memorization that is expected from you. But what is expected is that you will reduce the calculations you need to do using reasoning.

If such a question does come in GMAT, the number will be and easier than 9856. Also, you can easily solve with 9856 too.

$$r^2 = 9856/pi = 9856*7/22$$

r must be an integer otherwise this calculation will become far too cumbersome for GMAT. So 9856 will be completely divisible by 22.
Also, 9856 must have 7 as a factor since perfect squares have powers of prime factors in pairs.
So let's try to split 9856 into factors. We already know that it must have 7 as a factor and 11 as a factor (to be divisible by 22)

$$9856 = 7*1408 = 7*11*128 = 7*11*2^7$$ (you must know that 2^7 = 128)

$$r^2 = \frac{7*11*2^7}{2*11} = 7*2^3 = 56$$

Again, $$H = \sqrt{65^2 - 56^2} = \sqrt{(65+56)(65 - 56)} = \sqrt{121*9} = 11*3 = 33$$
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13510
Followers: 577

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

Re: In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the ro [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jun 2015, 01:24
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13510
Followers: 577

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

Re: In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the ro [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Dec 2016, 09:57
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: In, a Hemisphere igloo, an Eskimo’s head just touches the ro   [#permalink] 27 Dec 2016, 09:57
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 What is the absolute value of twice the difference of the ro 3 20 Aug 2013, 11:27
19 A right circular cone is inscribed in a hemisphere so that 9 09 Jul 2012, 03:41
2 The base of a hemisphere is inscribed in one face of a cube 4 10 Jun 2012, 16:43
18 A right circular cone is inscribed in a hemisphere so that 12 03 Apr 2012, 15:49
11 There are 8 red chips and 2 blue ones. When arranged in a ro 13 10 Oct 2009, 20:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by