In a IIgm (parallelogram) the lengths of adjacent sides are : PS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 17:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In a IIgm (parallelogram) the lengths of adjacent sides are

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Location: Boston
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2005, 14:26
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

In a IIgm (parallelogram) the lengths of adjacent sides are 12 and 14 respectively. If the length of one diagonal is 16 find that of the other.

(a) 21
(b) 20.6
(c) 20.4
(d) 20.1
(e) 19.5
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 419
Location: Phoenix
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2005, 15:28
anirban16 wrote:
In a IIgm (parallelogram) the lengths of adjacent sides are 12 and 14 respectively. If the length of one diagonal is 16 find that of the other.

(a) 21
(b) 20.6
(c) 20.4
(d) 20.1
(e) 19.5

(B) 20.6

The figure becomes too complex, but I'd post the solution now, and the figure later (from home)

This holds true if the smaller diagonal is 16.

Assume distance between the 14-14 parallel sides is z, and dropping the perpendicular from the 12-14 vertex onto the 14 side results in a triangle with a base x. (Of course its height would be z, and hypotenuse would be 12.

Therefore, 144 = x^2 + y^2

Also, in the right triangle formed by the smaller diagonal,

16^2 = z^2 + (14-x)^2
or 256 = z^2 + 196 + x^2 - 28x

Solving them, we get x = 3.

Putting x back in, we get z = sqrt(134).

Applying these values to the right triangle formed by the larger diagonal,

diagonal^2 = z^2 + (14+x)^2
= 134 + 17^2 = 134 + 289 = 423
=> longer diagonal = sqrt (423) ~ 20.6
_________________

Who says elephants can't dance?

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2005, 05:53
p^2+q^2=2(a^2+b^2) => where p is diag2 and q is diag1, a and b are the adjacent sides. => insert the values => 256+q^2=2(144+196) => q^2=424=~20,6
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 246
Location: Rockville
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2005, 07:36
christoph wrote:
p^2+q^2=2(a^2+b^2) => where p is diag2 and q is diag1, a and b are the adjacent sides. => insert the values => 256+q^2=2(144+196) => q^2=424=~20,6

but its a llgm, what is the reasoning behind the p^2+q^2=2(a^2+b^2)
isnt that a derivation from the properties of a rectangle?
VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2005, 07:43
Rupstar wrote:
christoph wrote:
p^2+q^2=2(a^2+b^2) => where p is diag2 and q is diag1, a and b are the adjacent sides. => insert the values => 256+q^2=2(144+196) => q^2=424=~20,6

but its a llgm, what is the reasoning behind the p^2+q^2=2(a^2+b^2)
isnt that a derivation from the properties of a rectangle?

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Parallelogram.html

hope this helps !
24 Mar 2005, 07:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by