Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Dec 2014, 20:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In a political system with only two major parties, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2913
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2005, 21:40
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

Please do explain you logic.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5081
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2005, 22:13
I take C. The passage suggests the third party is only capable of taking votes off the other two major parties and is not capable of capturing votes from new voters.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1707
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2005, 22:23
'B'.

If voters were equally divided, then new party will

1) attract few voters favoring only one of the parties
2) attract few voters each from those favoring one of the parties
3) attract none of the voters

In any case, the statement 'B' is true.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1895
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Political Party [#permalink] New post 22 Nov 2005, 03:19
ps_dahiya wrote:
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
Please do explain you logic.


I don't think C is correct coz if the third party attracts those who have never voted for the other two parties --> this can't affect the competition between those two parties.

The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate ---> this part indicates that the third party attracts not a great number of voters from either parties -----> small changes in number of votes can affect the competition of the two parties----> it should be that the two parties have equal numbers of voters.
This italic part also suggests that if Z ( 3rd party) attracts voters, it can only attract voters from X( 1st one) OR Y (2nd one) BUT NOT BOTH ----> further support B.

"neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote" in B is the foudation for conclusion that Z affects the competition.

Phew, hard to clearly explain but everything in passage suggests what is in B.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Nov 2005, 03:49
I agree with lexi here.

B is the answer.
_________________

hey ya......

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Nov 2005, 04:00
Even I think it should be B, C is unrelated to the passage.

Alok
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2913
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Nov 2005, 11:55
OA is B
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Nov 2005, 00:10
I vote for B.

Using POE.

A - Cannot be inferred.
B - Correct answer.
C,D,E - Out of Scope.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Nov 2005, 00:25
I choose B. it is pretty straight forward!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

  [#permalink] 23 Nov 2005, 00:25
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In a political system with only two major parties, the noboru 16 24 Apr 2010, 12:18
In a political system with only two major parties, the shrutisingh 4 21 Jul 2009, 02:09
In a political system with only two major parties, the trainspotting 9 27 Jun 2009, 06:59
In a political system with only two major parties, the lordw 3 01 Aug 2008, 08:51
23 Experts publish their posts in the topic In a political system with only two major parties, the sebycb976 35 03 Jun 2008, 16:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a political system with only two major parties, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.