In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 22:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 89
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 57 [1] , given: 3

In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2012, 23:50
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (02:09) correct 40% (01:15) wrong based on 414 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs needed to growfull size beef stock, many ranchers substitute cornmeal and ground bones for their cattle's regular diet, branded by them to become generic-grade beef.

a) for their cattle's regular diet, branded by them
b) for the regular diet of their cattle which have been branded
c) for the regular diet of their cattle, having been branded
d) in place of their cattle's regular diet, for those of them branded
e) in place of the regular diet of their cattle to have been branded by them

What is "which" referring to in (b) ??
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Current Student
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 311
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 28

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 142

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2012, 01:21
"Which" referes to immediately preceding noun. Here Cattle.

a. Diet is not branded
b. Fine
c. Changes meaning: necessary for cattles to be branded first, for following the diet
d. Substitute+for , for those of them incorrect pronoun reference
e. Substitute+for , in place -redundant, wordy and imprecise.

20 seconds. Is this really a 700 level ??
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire

Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 307
Followers: 521

Kudos [?]: 983 [3] , given: 2

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2012, 17:40
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I have an issue with this question. While we can clearly eliminate (D) and (E) because they violate the idiom 'substitute for', (B) is not technically correct. In American English, the use of 'which' as a relative pronoun modifying a preceding noun must always be preceded by a comma, as in 'noun, which.' Here there is no comma before the 'which.' My theory, which could be totally off, is that the person who wrote this was following British English, which does not require a comma before the 'which.' Perhaps a more likely explanation, if I invoke Ockham's razor, is that the person simply forgot to put the comma before 'which' when they entered this question into the thread.

Either way, we need a comma before 'which' for this to be a valid question.

Hope that helps .
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Intern
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 25
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 10

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2012, 19:24
ChrisLele wrote:
I have an issue with this question. While we can clearly eliminate (D) and (E) because they violate the idiom 'substitute for', (B) is not technically correct. In American English, the use of 'which' as a relative pronoun modifying a preceding noun must always be preceded by a comma, as in 'noun, which.' Here there is no comma before the 'which.' My theory, which could be totally off, is that the person who wrote this was following British English, which does not require a comma before the 'which.' Perhaps a more likely explanation, if I invoke Ockham's razor, is that the person simply forgot to put the comma before 'which' when they entered this question into the thread.

Either way, we need a comma before 'which' for this to be a valid question.

Hope that helps .

i like the explanation

here another thing needs to be noted down
that cattle VS have DOES NOT agree

so this should be CATTLE HAS....BCZ it's a collective noun.
Current Student
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 311
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 28

Kudos [?]: 391 [3] , given: 142

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2012, 08:29
3
KUDOS
@ChrisLele

I do not think there is any difference in usage of "Which" in American and British style.
And the option is completely fine.

1. If "Which" is used for a restrictive clause, we don't need any comma. i.e. qualifies the noun
2. If "Which" is used for a non-restrictive clause, we need a comma. i.e. provides additional information about the noun

Cattle which have been branded -> This means: Of all, the ones which are branded, excluding the non-branded ones
Cattle, which have been branded -> This means: All the individuals in the group are branded, there are none non-branded

@ HeyGMAT:
Cattle is not a collective noun, It is a plural noun.
For collection we use: Herd of Cattle, Drove of Cattle etc.

When we refer to individual of a collective noun we use singular verb.
The Jury were in his favor -> Entire group was in favor
The Jury was divided in opinion. -> Individuals

Though, here you might observe differences in British and American English.
The British use the plural form and the Americans use the singular, in all cases.
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire

Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 73
GMAT Date: 11-02-2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 17

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2012, 02:59
I chose B, but can someone explain why A & C are wrong?
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1196
Followers: 129

Kudos [?]: 1465 [0], given: 142

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2013, 10:30
Hi e-GMAT,
Can you please share your views on this qs? What should be the OA and why?

Is it truly a GMAT like one?
_________________
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Posts: 25
Location: Russian Federation
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 29

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2013, 21:13
ConnectTheDots wrote:
@ChrisLele

I do not think there is any difference in usage of "Which" in American and British style.
And the option is completely fine.

1. If "Which" is used for a restrictive clause, we don't need any comma. i.e. qualifies the noun
2. If "Which" is used for a non-restrictive clause, we need a comma. i.e. provides additional information about the noun

Cattle which have been branded -> This means: Of all, the ones which are branded, excluding the non-branded ones
Cattle, which have been branded -> This means: All the individuals in the group are branded, .

As I know, "WHICH" is not used in a restrictive clause and must be replaced by "THAT". Therefore, a comma is needed or "which" must be changed on "that".
Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 225
Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 34

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2013, 03:27
Dmitriy wrote:
ConnectTheDots wrote:
@ChrisLele

I do not think there is any difference in usage of "Which" in American and British style.
And the option is completely fine.

1. If "Which" is used for a restrictive clause, we don't need any comma. i.e. qualifies the noun
2. If "Which" is used for a non-restrictive clause, we need a comma. i.e. provides additional information about the noun

Cattle which have been branded -> This means: Of all, the ones which are branded, excluding the non-branded ones
Cattle, which have been branded -> This means: All the individuals in the group are branded, .

As I know, "WHICH" is not used in a restrictive clause and must be replaced by "THAT". Therefore, a comma is needed or "which" must be changed on "that".

No this conception is incorrect which can be used for restrictive clauses as in the scenario mentioned
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10534
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2014, 00:03
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 118
Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 44

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2015, 02:12
So what is the consensus? I am still confused whether this question is accurate!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10534
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2016, 06:57
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2012
Posts: 97
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.5
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 41

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2016, 06:57
The answer would have been correct only if there would be comma before which

b) for the regular diet of their cattle , which have been branded

Therefore poorly typed question
_________________

#Carpie Diem #

Re: In an effort to shorten the time span and cut the costs   [#permalink] 27 Sep 2016, 06:57
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
90 In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut 31 14 Sep 2009, 10:38
117 The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are 61 16 May 2009, 07:18
The results of the companys cost- cutting measures are 15 10 Oct 2007, 13:01
The results of the companys cost- cutting measures are 9 13 Apr 2007, 02:14
2 The results of the companys cost-cutting measures are 12 09 Feb 2007, 13:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by