Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 12:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 107 [1] , given: 0

In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2008, 14:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were played for neonates in adjacent nurseries in a hospital. In nursery A, classical music was played; in nursery B, rock music was played. After two weeks, it was found that the babies in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did the babies in nursery B.

Which of the following additional experimental data would support the hypothesis that classical music is beneficial to the development of newborn?

A. The neonates in a nursery where no music was played fared better than those in nursery B.

B. Nursery A contained 15 percent more premature babies than nursery B.

C. The newborns in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did newborns in a nursery with no music.

D. The music played in nursery A was louder than that played in nursery B.

E. The ratio of nurses to newborns in nursery B was 1 to 4; in nursery A, it was 1 to 6.

Please provide explanation.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1435
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2008, 14:54
A. The neonates in a nursery where no music was played fared better than those in nursery B.

This actually weakens saying that no music is good for health


B. Nursery A contained 15 percent more premature babies than nursery

Keep it. CM was so good that it made premature babies healthier in 3 aspects.


C. The newborns in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did newborns in a nursery with no music.

Comparison with No music new borns. It is saying that it helps. Keep it


D. The music played in nursery A was louder than that played in nursery B.

To me out of scope.

E. The ratio of nurses to newborns in nursery B was 1 to 4; in nursery A, it was 1 to 6.

Out of scope


Between B and C to me its B because CM helped premature babies, who have some deficiencies healthier in 3 different aspects.

What is the OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 291
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2008, 02:57
hanumayamma wrote:
In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were played for neonates in adjacent nurseries in a hospital. In nursery A, classical music was played; in nursery B, rock music was played. After two weeks, it was found that the babies in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did the babies in nursery B.

Which of the following additional experimental data would support the hypothesis that classical music is beneficial to the development of newborn?

A. The neonates in a nursery where no music was played fared better than those in nursery B.
=> Not addressing the issue in hand.
B. Nursery A contained 15 percent more premature babies than nursery B.
=>Could be a contender but note the way the CR starts --
music were played for neonates

ne·o·nate
n. A newborn infant, especially one less than four weeks old.
So premature baby are Out Of Scope.

C. The newborns in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did newborns in a nursery with no music.
Hold IT
D. The music played in nursery A was louder than that played in nursery B.
The impact of intensity not discussed.
E. The ratio of nurses to newborns in nursery B was 1 to 4; in nursery A, it was 1 to 6.
The effect nursing care not discussed.

Please provide explanation.


C
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 513
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2008, 04:14
It should be C.

E was close, but as nursing isnt discussed in the pasage it become Out of scope.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1435
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2008, 06:08
I understand that neonate is A newborn infant, especially one less than four weeks old. A neonate can still be premature. A premature baby is one that is born before the full 9 months. I feel that it is safe to assume that premature babies have some sort of deficiencies, with out picking the exact deficiencies

This is a strengthen Q and it can add evidence/premises or establish assumptions.

Looking at the Q again

Which of the following additional experimental data would support the hypothesis that classical music is beneficial to the development of newborn?

asks for data that supports the hypothesis that CM is beneficial to development of new borns.

B is stronger to me compared to C

(1) B compares neonates who heard music vs neonates who heard music

(2) In B neonates with deficiencies are doing well after hearing music


In C

(1) Comparison is between neonates who heard music and who did not hear music at all

Can we compare neonates who heard music and who did not hear any music and deduce that music was beneficial to one group?

What is the OA?
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 978
Location: Toronto
Followers: 261

Kudos [?]: 709 [0], given: 3

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2008, 08:23
icandy wrote:
asks for data that supports the hypothesis that CM is beneficial to development of new borns.


I think you've bolded the wrong word here. I look at the conclusion as follows:

"CM is beneficial to the development of newborns."

The experimental data could support two findings:

1) CM is beneficial to the development of newborns;
2) Rock music is detrimental to the development of newborns.

How to decide between the two conclusions? Use a control group of newborns- a group that has no music played to them. If they develop worse than the Classical music group, this supports the finding that Classical music was indeed beneficial. C.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1435
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2008, 08:37
Ian,

Thanks for your explanation. I missed underlining the beneficial part along with development

You said

The experimental data could support two findings:

1) CM is beneficial to the development of newborns; ( I agree )
2) Rock music is detrimental to the development of newborns. ( My thought is RM did not make any difference to group B. B says CM was played to group A and A has premature babies. )

We don't know what RM did to group B, but we know that CM has the power to make premature babies healthy in 3 different aspects. If I am wrong, which I am apparently as the OA is C, I am wondering assuming premature babies possibly will have some deficiencies is the reason for my wrong answer.

Thanks to the OP for a good Q +1
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 291
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2008, 09:32
I was a bit quick with neonates !!! My apologies.

Icandy,
But B remains out of scope , as the stage of babies of babies is not being discussed. I mean
point here is not to prove if CM is have +ve effect on Premature baby it is a proof that it
has better effect on Normal babies.
The group having more Premature Babies doesn't support conclusion.

Conclusion : CM -->(beneficial) New Born.

The option C is more just for the conclusion , as it eliminates a major factor ( No Music ) from
breaking the conclusion.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2008, 11:57
IMO C.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 541
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2008, 06:30
I get A.

We are looking for the answer that tells us that the results of the experiment are due to the music and nothing else.

A. The neonates in a nursery where no music was played fared better than those in nursery B.
This indicates that music affects the babies. Correct
B. Nursery A contained 15 percent more premature babies than nursery B.
This provides another reason for the results.
C. The newborns in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did newborns in a nursery with no music.
This is a restatement of given information.
D. The music played in nursery A was louder than that played in nursery B.
This provides another reason for the results. Maybe loudness and not the type in beneficial.
E. The ratio of nurses to newborns in nursery B was 1 to 4; in nursery A, it was 1 to 6.
This provides another outside reason for the results.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 161
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2008, 08:05
Quote:
Which of the following additional experimental data would support the hypothesis that classical music is beneficial to the development of newborn?


B. Nursery A contained 15 percent more premature babies than nursery B.

C. The newborns in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did newborns in a nursery with no music. may contain only matured babies



asked for additional experimental data...C provides us with a completely new experiment.bcz the original experiment contains only nurseries A and B..Here in C, we are talking about a completely new experiment which has nursery A and another nursery with no music.

Between B and C ...i choose B
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 541
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2008, 08:49
I read too fast and missed the end of C.

C. The newborns in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did newborns in a nursery with no music.

After looking at it this is the correct answer. It shows that classical music is beneficial.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2008, 09:24
hanumayamma wrote:
In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were played for neonates in adjacent nurseries in a hospital. In nursery A, classical music was played; in nursery B, rock music was played. After two weeks, it was found that the babies in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did the babies in nursery B.

Which of the following additional experimental data would support the hypothesis that classical music is beneficial to the development of newborn?

A. The neonates in a nursery where no music was played fared better than those in nursery B.

B. Nursery A contained 15 percent more premature babies than nursery B.

C. The newborns in nursery A cried less, suffered fewer minor ailments, and gained more weight than did newborns in a nursery with no music.

D. The music played in nursery A was louder than that played in nursery B.

E. The ratio of nurses to newborns in nursery B was 1 to 4; in nursery A, it was 1 to 6.

Please provide explanation.


We have 2 hyothesis
X- blah blah.....with classical music
Y - blah blah.....rock music
To benchmark these we need a 3rd reference.
C exactly does that by evaluating the scenario with "no music"

C
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Classical Music [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2008, 15:35
Thanks All.

Answer: C
Re: CR: Classical Music   [#permalink] 07 Jul 2008, 15:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were BarneyStinson 7 11 Feb 2010, 19:19
In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were chalven 2 02 Jul 2009, 15:07
In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were iced_tea 7 08 Sep 2006, 16:21
In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were ywilfred 8 02 Sep 2005, 07:19
In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were HIMALAYA 8 24 May 2005, 22:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In an experiment, two different types of recorded music were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.