Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 04:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 588
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2012, 04:05
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

78% (02:50) correct 22% (00:00) wrong based on 46 sessions
In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious electric shocks. Fifty of them received twenty strong shocks,
but the other half received weak shocks, except for three random strong shocks. The volunteers were told in
advance which group they were in. The researchers discovered that the volunteers who consistently received
strong shocks showed much milder physical signs of anxiety than the other volunteers did.

Which of the following would, if true, most help to explain the results of the experiment?

A. Other studies have found that the inability to predict when an anticipated unpleasant experience will occur usually
provokes anxiety.
B. Most people feel more anxiety when anticipating a strong electric shock than when anticipating a mild shock.
C. Many of the volunteers who consistently received strong shocks reported that the shocks made them feel quite anxious.
D. The volunteers who received mostly mild shocks showed stronger physical signs of anxiety after each strong shock
than after each mild shock.
E. People who knowingly volunteer for an experiment in which they will receive electric shocks typically feel less anxiety
about such shocks than most other people would.

OA later
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 648
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 364 [1] , given: 23

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious shocks [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2012, 04:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
gmatbull wrote:
In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious electric shocks. Fifty of them received twenty strong shocks,
but the other half received weak shocks, except for three random strong shocks. The volunteers were told in
advance which group they were in. The researchers discovered that the volunteers who consistently received
strong shocks showed much milder physical signs of anxiety than the other volunteers did.

Which of the following would, if true, most help to explain the results of the experiment?

A. Other studies have found that the inability to predict when an anticipated unpleasant experience will occur usually
provokes anxiety.
B. Most people feel more anxiety when anticipating a strong electric shock than when anticipating a mild shock.
C. Many of the volunteers who consistently received strong shocks reported that the shocks made them feel quite anxious.
D. The volunteers who received mostly mild shocks showed stronger physical signs of anxiety after each strong shock
than after each mild shock.
E. People who knowingly volunteer for an experiment in which they will receive electric shocks typically feel less anxiety
about such shocks than most other people would.

OA later


Ans A it should be. when volunteers expected that they would recieve all strong shocks they would be mentally prepared for it. However, those, who did not which one would be strong and which one mild, would be more anxious due to anticipation.

Ans A it is.
Edited: Choice A. explained A and chose D :oops:
_________________

Lets Kudos!!! ;-)
Black Friday Debrief


Last edited by Vips0000 on 14 Nov 2012, 19:55, edited 1 time in total.
AGSM Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 167
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 31

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious shocks [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2012, 04:39
IMO D.

People who receive strong shocks have adapted to the strong shocks (gained experience) and thus, are less anxious while people who receive mild shocks react to strong shocks and are more anxious.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 299
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 32

GMAT Tests User
Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious shocks [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2012, 04:43
yes +1 for D....! What the OA sir?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: wants to beat the gmat
Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Posts: 20
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious shocks [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2012, 18:35
Can someone explain why A doesnt work?
VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1096
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 67

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious shocks [#permalink] New post 15 Nov 2012, 00:52
I also opt for D.

pls post OA and OE,
the wordings are complicated, core meaning is simple.
Can anyone take a dig at all the options.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Location: European union
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 38

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious shocks [#permalink] New post 15 Nov 2012, 15:53
'A' says that people are more anxious when they cannot anticipate an unpleasant feeling. The problem explicitly says that participants were told in advance in which group they are, so they are supposed to be able to anticipate which group will receive what shocks. So I believe we cannot talk about anticipations here.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious shocks [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2012, 17:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
IMO A.

Here's why:

The important language in the stem is "explain."

(D) does not explain the results of the study, but simply repeats them. It is stated that the "researchers discovered that the volunteers who consistently received strong shocks showed much milder physical signs of anxiety than the other volunteers did." This information is basically a rephrasing of what (D) states.

Ivan91 wrote:
'A' says that people are more anxious when they cannot anticipate an unpleasant feeling. The problem explicitly says that participants were told in advance in which group they are, so they are supposed to be able to anticipate which group will receive what shocks. So I believe we cannot talk about anticipations here.


(A) is the better choice since it actually offers support (i.e. an explanation) for the results of the study. There is anticipation that is relevant, but it is is contextual. There is a much higher level of anticipation within the second group (whose participants receive 3 random strong shocks among 30) since they are less able to predict when they will receive a strong shock, as compared to the first group. Thus, (A) best explains why the first group showed milder signs of anxiety.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2012, 22:22
gmatbull wrote:
In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious electric shocks. Fifty of them received twenty strong shocks,
but the other half received weak shocks, except for three random strong shocks. The volunteers were told in
advance which group they were in. The researchers discovered that the volunteers who consistently received
strong shocks showed much milder physical signs of anxiety than the other volunteers did.

Which of the following would, if true, most help to explain the results of the experiment?

A. Other studies have found that the inability to predict when an anticipated unpleasant experience will occur usually
provokes anxiety.
B. Most people feel more anxiety when anticipating a strong electric shock than when anticipating a mild shock.
C. Many of the volunteers who consistently received strong shocks reported that the shocks made them feel quite anxious.
D. The volunteers who received mostly mild shocks showed stronger physical signs of anxiety after each strong shock
than after each mild shock.
E. People who knowingly volunteer for an experiment in which they will receive electric shocks typically feel less anxiety
about such shocks than most other people would.

OA later


IMO A
I chose A because it clearly explains the reason behind mild shock group's higher anxiety levels.D adds more info without explaining the reason for high anxiety levels.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 588
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious [#permalink] New post 20 Nov 2012, 23:44
The question looks more of a paradox..
why would ppl with strong shocks show mild anxiety while those who received mostly weak shock show strong anxiety?
The answer is rightly explained by Vips0000 and seths22.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 278
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.75
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 20 [1] , given: 282

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 00:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
+1 for A
B. Most people feel more anxiety when anticipating a strong electric shock than when anticipating a mild shock. Contradicts
C. Many of the volunteers who consistently received strong shocks reported that the shocks made them feel quite anxious.Contradicts
D. The volunteers who received mostly mild shocks showed stronger physical signs of anxiety after each strong shock
than after each mild shock. We are concerned about only the continuous strong shock
E. People who knowingly volunteer for an experiment in which they will receive electric shocks typically feel less anxiety
about such shocks than most other people would. Looks good. But it says 'most other people would'

Between A and E will choose A
_________________

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+

Re: In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2012, 00:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 In a trial, two groups of people were shown images gmatbull 2 08 Nov 2012, 03:10
31 Experts publish their posts in the topic 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them calreg11 13 16 Feb 2012, 20:34
2 Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who SudiptoGmat 15 18 Feb 2010, 07:44
Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who gmacvik 9 24 Jan 2006, 14:21
Is the range of salary of 100 people smaller than 100,000? pb_india 5 14 Jan 2005, 08:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In an trial, 100 people received thirty non-injurious

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.