Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Aug 2016, 21:11
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Location: Zapopan Mexico
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Mar 2012, 15:36
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (03:20) correct 30% (04:02) wrong based on 160 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

34. In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.
a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers

Could someone explain me, why is answer C wrong. Additionally, could you explain the important differences between answer C and D. I believe the difference is the idiom "published on" or "published about" but not sure.
Best regards.

FYI I´m amazed with the book GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR, I bought it and it´s great. I´ve read it all and I found only 2 cons.
1 There is no explanation for the answers.
2 some orthographic mistakes (most of them irrelevant to the context).
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 181
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 20

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Mar 2012, 16:26
hero4th wrote:
34. In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.
a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers

Could someone explain me, why is answer C wrong. Additionally, could you explain the important differences between answer C and D. I believe the difference is the idiom "published on" or "published about" but not sure.
Best regards.

FYI I´m amazed with the book GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR, I bought it and it´s great. I´ve read it all and I found only 2 cons.
1 There is no explanation for the answers.
2 some orthographic mistakes (most of them irrelevant to the context).



Close call between A and D. Winner is D.
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 151 [2] , given: 31

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2012, 00:25
2
This post received
KUDOS
In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
--> it changes the meaning severely conveying that stone points are excavating something from the layers--> nuisance meaning

b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated

c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
--> no verb here sentence incorrect better say fragment.

d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
--> CORRECT it conserves the meaning

e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers
--> changes the meaning

D is the best one.

HTH
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 94
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 42

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2012, 12:03
riteshv wrote:
What's wrong with A


ditto. Since I'm not familiar with the subject matter, neither A or D sounds "right" to me.

i don't know if excavating is an active process or it happened in the past from the sentence.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 2

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2012, 05:49
hero4th wrote:
34. In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.
a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers

Could someone explain me, why is answer C wrong. Additionally, could you explain the important differences between answer C and D. I believe the difference is the idiom "published on" or "published about" but not sure.
Best regards.

FYI I´m amazed with the book GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR, I bought it and it´s great. I´ve read it all and I found only 2 cons.
1 There is no explanation for the answers.
2 some orthographic mistakes (most of them irrelevant to the context).




Ans Exp

first we should get that subject is singular report so the verb must also be in singular so the actual sentence correctly uses the helping verb but excavating is used for continuous tense as the question is about past so eliminate A on this basis then we are left with b,c,d,e and we can eliminate b because it uses wrong verb were for singular report so we have c,d,e, as c uses' published about' so which makes it wrong, about is used only to describe some thing, so here the report is not describing about stone projectile it's just providing information so eliminate c on this basis, then we are left with d and e we can take d as correct answer because is uses correct verb 'was' and past tense of word excavated so we are left with e Makes total mockery with no correct meaning so eliminate e .


Answer Option is d ,hope it's clear.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1984
Followers: 1947

Kudos [?]: 6446 [1] , given: 260

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2012, 06:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi All,

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

Image

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points. These points date back 64,000 years and have been excavated from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

Image

The verb-ing modifier “excavating” has been placed right after “64,000 years” without any comma preceding it. This means that this modifier is referring to “64,000 years”. This is absolutely illogical because now the sentence suggests that “64,000 years” did the action of excavating. This is the only error in the sentence. Now let’s run the POE to find the correct answer.

POE:

Choice A: Incorrect. Modifier error as discussed above.

Choice B: were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated: Incorrect. Firstly, this choice has subject verb number agreement error. Singular “a report” cannot have plural verb “were published”. Secondly, change in the placement of “layers” makes the sentence illogical.

Choice C: published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers: Incorrect. Absence of “was” before “published” turns the sentence into active voice. The sentence now suggests that “a report” did the action of publishing about “stone projectile points”. However, the facts are published in a report. A report does not do the job of publishing.

Choice D: was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers. Correct. This choice turns “excavating” to “excavated” that refers to “stone projectile points”. This means that these points were excavated in South Africa.

Choice E: on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers: Incorrect. “published about layers” suggests that some facts were published about the layers. This choice has an illogical meaning.

PS @hero4th: Please read the explanation of Choices C and D to find the difference between the two. Here it is voice issue rather than the idiom.

Image

1. A verb-ing modifier modifies the immediate preceding noun if the modifier is not preceded by a comma.
2. We must use correct voice to convey the logical intended meaning of the sentence.
3. Notice the change in placements of words as they may change the meaning of the sentence.

Hope this helps.

Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 247
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 93

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2014, 21:38
"...........the report was published on stone projectile points...........". How can a report publish on stone projectile points at all? Shouldn't it be" the report on stone projectile points was published"

Where am I getting wrong?

egmat wrote:
Hi All,

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

Image

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points. These points date back 64,000 years and have been excavated from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

Image

The verb-ing modifier “excavating” has been placed right after “64,000 years” without any comma preceding it. This means that this modifier is referring to “64,000 years”. This is absolutely illogical because now the sentence suggests that “64,000 years” did the action of excavating. This is the only error in the sentence. Now let’s run the POE to find the correct answer.

POE:

Choice A: Incorrect. Modifier error as discussed above.

Choice B: were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated: Incorrect. Firstly, this choice has subject verb number agreement error. Singular “a report” cannot have plural verb “were published”. Secondly, change in the placement of “layers” makes the sentence illogical.

Choice C: published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers: Incorrect. Absence of “was” before “published” turns the sentence into active voice. The sentence now suggests that “a report” did the action of publishing about “stone projectile points”. However, the facts are published in a report. A report does not do the job of publishing.

Choice D: was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers. Correct. This choice turns “excavating” to “excavated” that refers to “stone projectile points”. This means that these points were excavated in South Africa.

Choice E: on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers: Incorrect. “published about layers” suggests that some facts were published about the layers. This choice has an illogical meaning.

PS @hero4th: Please read the explanation of Choices C and D to find the difference between the two. Here it is voice issue rather than the idiom.

Image

1. A verb-ing modifier modifies the immediate preceding noun if the modifier is not preceded by a comma.
2. We must use correct voice to convey the logical intended meaning of the sentence.
3. Notice the change in placements of words as they may change the meaning of the sentence.

Hope this helps.

Thanks.
Shraddha

_________________

Middle of nowhere!

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9306
Followers: 807

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2016, 19:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile   [#permalink] 21 May 2016, 19:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A recently published report indicates that the salaries of t dheeraj24 0 25 Mar 2014, 05:01
7 NASA recently published a report cautioning that many of the gmatbull 9 07 Sep 2010, 05:31
18 Experts publish their posts in the topic A recently published report indicates that the salaries of noboru 26 25 Aug 2010, 16:25
A recently published report indicates that the salaries of tarek99 5 28 Oct 2008, 04:10
A recently published report indicates that the salaries of gk3.14 4 17 Dec 2006, 14:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.