In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash
injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries
are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered
This is a finding given to discuss, or at issue of the argument
These"WRONG TO DRAW FURTHER CONCLUSION THAT...." make it a MAIN CONCLUSION that is criticized later by couter-evidence: "CLEARLY,..."
commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries
with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious
SomeThis conclusion has no choice that it must be intermidiate conclusion that support to the Main conclusion above that is latter criticized by the author.
commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for
whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified