Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 May 2016, 23:57
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Posts: 90
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 12

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2011, 02:55
11
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (02:08) correct 62% (01:16) wrong based on 369 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal
charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil
damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 20

Re: pronoun ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2011, 06:51
odometers disconnected vs dsconnected odometers, latter seems to say as if it was a part of the car and test drives were done on it. former is preferable
between A D now,
also in options A & B, for cars that were/it seem to convey as if the compnay dint volunatarily remove the meters, it just happened and it wa spaying up for it. but as the sentecne says it was a no contest case, compnay was at fault.
D coveys this meaning, having test driven cars -the company knew tht was happening.
_________________

The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary.

If my post made you think, KUDO it. Its easy :D

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3505
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 482

Kudos [?]: 3940 [2] , given: 320

Re: pronoun ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2011, 07:17
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here is an another angle to this Q

Point1. The test- driving occurred prior to pleading. So that must be expressed in either a past perfect or some such equivalent expression that brings out that priorness

Point 2. ‘Disconnected motors’ is inferior to ‘odometers that were disconnected, because the former gives a feeling as if there is some special kind of odometers such as disconnected odometers and connected odometers.

B and D are in contention. But B suffers from using the inelegant phrase ‘disconnected odometers’.

D is a better choice for clearly bringing out that the tests had been carried out prior to pleading by marking the tests as ‘having test-driven’ and for using the more acceptable ‘ their odometers disconnected’
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 289 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: pronoun ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2011, 07:34
D wins because of ||ism. Charges of ( ing and ing ) ie tampering and having

Posted from my mobile device Image
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7386
Followers: 697

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2014, 13:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7386
Followers: 697

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2015, 04:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 1562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.56
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 100

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2015, 21:18
whichscore wrote:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal
charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil
damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers



well, it's illogical to say that the company paid damages for cars...
maybe it paid for having cars with no odometers?

A,B, and C - out.

between D and E - D is the winner.
E changes the meaning:
having cars
cars that were test driven with disconnected odometers -- again, same mistake as in A,B,and C - company paid damages for having cars...no

D - company paid damages for having cars with their odometers disconnected!!!
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no   [#permalink] 19 Nov 2015, 21:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic In December of 1987 an automobile manufacture pleaded no bsv180985 23 25 Nov 2009, 02:03
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no suyashjhawar 11 15 Apr 2008, 09:02
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no nitinneha 19 10 Apr 2007, 15:34
1). One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to PPGJ 12 16 Aug 2006, 03:25
4 One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase likar 17 11 Jul 2006, 08:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.