Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 05:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 12

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2011, 01:55
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

40% (02:06) correct 60% (01:08) wrong based on 156 sessions
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal
charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil
damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 20

Re: pronoun ? [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2011, 05:51
odometers disconnected vs dsconnected odometers, latter seems to say as if it was a part of the car and test drives were done on it. former is preferable
between A D now,
also in options A & B, for cars that were/it seem to convey as if the compnay dint volunatarily remove the meters, it just happened and it wa spaying up for it. but as the sentecne says it was a no contest case, compnay was at fault.
D coveys this meaning, having test driven cars -the company knew tht was happening.
_________________

The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary.

If my post made you think, KUDO it. Its easy :D

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1701 [1] , given: 249

Premium Member
Re: pronoun ? [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2011, 06:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Here is an another angle to this Q

Point1. The test- driving occurred prior to pleading. So that must be expressed in either a past perfect or some such equivalent expression that brings out that priorness

Point 2. ‘Disconnected motors’ is inferior to ‘odometers that were disconnected, because the former gives a feeling as if there is some special kind of odometers such as disconnected odometers and connected odometers.

B and D are in contention. But B suffers from using the inelegant phrase ‘disconnected odometers’.

D is a better choice for clearly bringing out that the tests had been carried out prior to pleading by marking the tests as ‘having test-driven’ and for using the more acceptable ‘ their odometers disconnected’
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 929
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: pronoun ? [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2011, 06:34
D wins because of ||ism. Charges of ( ing and ing ) ie tampering and having

Posted from my mobile device Image
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2317
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2014, 12:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no   [#permalink] 15 Jul 2014, 12:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no myc2004 2 24 Apr 2006, 08:41
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no vivek123 3 28 Feb 2006, 10:34
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no amy_v 6 24 Nov 2005, 11:48
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no rahuluec 6 02 Nov 2005, 18:41
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no nakib77 4 01 Nov 2005, 13:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.