Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 03 Sep 2015, 20:34
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 119
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 18:41
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (02:30) correct 50% (01:00) wrong based on 17 sessions
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.

(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 19:54
It is definetly not A & B. I understand C) is poorly worded but it seems to be the right choice only because it gets the main point across. The automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest because it had test driven cars with disconnected odometers.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Toronto, ON
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 20:23
I think it's D because the civil damages where for the "test-driving"
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 106
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 21:32
My pick is D.

The company has to pay for test-driving a car -- not for the car itself.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 119
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2005, 06:20
OA is D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2005, 10:37
I liked D) initially but I felt it was wrong because it appeared to have two meanings. 1) the auto manufacturer simply has in its posession test driven cars with disconnected odometers 2) the company test drove cars with disconnected odometers. Does it matter if an SC question has a dual meaning? I would suspect this scenario would be wrong in most cases. Can someone point out what is wrong with this reasoning?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2005, 13:11
aikido_fudoshin wrote:
I liked D) initially but I felt it was wrong because it appeared to have two meanings. 1) the auto manufacturer simply has in its posession test driven cars with disconnected odometers 2) the company test drove cars with disconnected odometers. Does it matter if an SC question has a dual meaning? I would suspect this scenario would be wrong in most cases. Can someone point out what is wrong with this reasoning?


The meaning 1) you suggested is more applicable to (D) than (E). If we relook at E:

having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

the italics portion is restrictive clause. The meaning for complete statement in passage may be:

they paid > 16m in civil damages for having some cars (a subset of only cars that were test driven) with disconnected odometer.

Also, we need to find best option available. E is good.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5122
Followers: 530

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink] New post 06 Aug 2015, 08:58
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Posts: 47
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 36

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2015, 01:18
I think it all boils down to meaning. I will only talk about D and E as most people have no problem in eliminating A,B and C. The placement of the word test-driven is important in the next two options.

(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected - Means that they paid charges because they test-drove cars with their odometer disconnected. Seems logical. If the company did this, then the whole process of test driving would be faulty and thus they will be sued if people find this out.

(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers - Means the company had some cars that were test-driven without odomoters. The company had to pay for 'test-driving cars' and not for 'driving cars'

D is my choice.
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no   [#permalink] 07 Aug 2015, 01:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no suyashjhawar 11 15 Apr 2008, 08:02
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no nitinneha 19 10 Apr 2007, 14:34
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no myc2004 2 24 Apr 2006, 08:41
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no amy_v 6 24 Nov 2005, 11:48
1 In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no nakib77 5 01 Nov 2005, 13:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.